I had a dream last night about a guy I’ll call David, who is a lawyer in a New York firm with a strong Jewish character. He’s a Zionist, and does some pro-Israel work, on the side. In the dream I was visiting David in jail. I was not allowed to see him, but I could phone him. I wanted to leave him a note. They would not allow that either. They wanted me to talk to him on a bugged phone, I just wanted to leave him a letter.
He’d been charged with dual loyalty. He was representing the U.S. government on a real estate deal with the Israeli embassy. The Americans wanted a certain price, but he was secretly in cahoots with the Israelis. Then the price dropped and it was right what the Israelis were hoping to pay. Then the U.S. government had found out he was actually working for Israel, and now he was in jail. He had been brought into the prison in camouflage with head covered, almost like Guantanamo. Along with another man.
It was a scary dream, about the treatment of Jews in the financial crisis. I had loving feelings toward him and conveyed them in the letter they wouldn’t deliver. So I called him on the phone but I didn’t hear his voice. Maybe he didn’t trust me. I certainly felt guilty, like an informant. His family very afraid, but I was walking thru the corridors of the jail, then I left. Unscathed of course. And I have to say I didn’t feel bad at the end, almost like it wasn’t my problem.
The dream gets at my guilty feelings around my exposing dual loyalty, this hidden allegiance in many Jews. Per my wife, who studies this stuff, I am all the people in the dream, the jailers, the informant, and David too. Though there are some feelings like Esther Rosenberg’s brother in it, about being Greenglass, the fink.The dream would also seem to be about the financial crisis and the fears some Jews have that Jews will be blamed.
Your word "exposing" belies the self-congratulation that you want. (That's there too.)
Phil Weiss, hero of "truth", and the American way.
The problem with the thesis, your state of research, your comments on importance are that they are still of the sledgehammer variety.
When to quote Obama, a scalpel is needed.
Sledgehammers deliver revolution, with a hundred thousand innocent victims. Scalpels cut only the diseased portion, the compromised specific policies, and result in reform that actually improves things.
No sensible person would assign blame for the current financial crisis to all Jews, yet what sane person could fail to notice
the ethnicity of the governors of the Fed,
of the Sandlers, of Barney Frank, of many
executives at Goldman Sachs, not to mention
the heads of the World Bank and the IMF?
1. America has a financial -service centric economy that sucks money away from the rest of the economy. It costs far more to run Wall Street than what Wall Street raises for new businesses. So who are the beneficiaries? the people who run the casino. Who are the losers? the rest of the economy.
Consider the average Joe who purs money into Wall Street every week via his 401 K plan. And what has the market done in the last 10 years? It has gone down. Where did the money go? Wall Street had to feed itself.
Jews who dominate American culture have permitted this money eating machine because it benefits them. Surely, it is self evident that if Wall Street hurt Jewish interests they would oppose and win such an argument via their broad control of the media, universities, think tanks etc
As for dual loyalty: it's epi- phenomenal….when you have different interests you are gonna have different loyalties. Jewish and Gentile interests sometimes align. But typically they dont. And too often Jews act against the majority's interests and with a coll indifference. Unfortunately this conflict of interests has had unhappy endings for all concerned down the centuries
It is my hope that Weiss' blog will alert Jews to the fact that they compose much of America's elite and that their interests are so misaligned with the general population.
Maybe the dream is about what is imprisoning you.
Interesting comments.
"Jews deserve …."
Don't worry, Phil, the victimhood approach makes wonders to create innocence where there is none. So many dreyfuses out there. The Rosenbergs, Morton Sobell, even Caryl Chessman have all bought a little real-state (must avoid the word) inside the ethnic bubble (my bad) of innocence. The dual-loyalists now sitting on eclectic chairs in academia, government, finance, media, will not roast today. First they will be defended by a crowd of "great minds", then they will be offered new eclectic chairs elsewhere along with some bailout (shouldn't say that), then they will grow old and then, laughing, confess. That simple. Even Witty will one day talk lightly about the good times when he did his obfuscation job for the zionist scourge. But not now. Now they are innocent. Now they are victims. People have no idea of what crime they talk about, but they have already declared themselves preemptively out of the guilty market (sorry for that.)
Or maybe after blaming everyone except themselves they will go for a little jogging on the treadmill and smile thinking nothing can hit…
"Let no American imagine that Zionism is inconsistent with patriotism. Multiple loyalties are objectionable only if they are inconsistent…Every American who aids in advancing the Jewish settlement in Palestine, though he feels that neither he nor his descendants will ever live there, will likewise be a better man and a better American for doing so…There is no inconsistency between loyalty to America and loyalty to Jewry. The Jewish spirit, the product of our religion and experiences, is essentially modern and essentially American."
Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis
I know i am naieve but…
Isn't it a good time to reinvent judaism?
Fiat money could be heading for extinction.
And it is forbidden to say many things that unglorify judaism.
Dual loyalties are not confined to the uSA. This is a multinationl world.
Holding on to the fiat money system could get fierce.
Our rulers have bad debts in the publics confidence. Somehow 19 century imperialists took over Judaism. And they are trigger happy.
"There is no inconsistency between loyalty to America and loyalty to Jewry."
Justice Brandeis may have thought there was no inconsistency there. But few other Americans agreed. Teddy Roosevelt insisted that if America is to work there cannot be any such thing as a "hyphendated American." Either you give yourself whole heartedly to the American experiment or find another place to live.