Neocons nakedly redefine themselves as ‘supporters of the American-Israel alliance’

Here neocon Ed Lasky, who deems Iraq a smashing success from his armchair, laments a report that Samantha Power escorted Obama to a recent realist-dominated dinner, a sign of her evident continuing influence, hosannah.

Supporters of the American- Israel alliance have many reasons to be wary of the role of Samantha Power at the National Security Council.

Oh sage, why did we invade Iraq?

About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.
Posted in Israel/Palestine, Neocons, US Policy in the Middle East, US Politics

{ 3 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. k_nomad says:

    Hello

    I recently came across your blog and have added you to my blogroll.

    Best wishes

  2. Ed says:

    "American-Israel alliance." Would that be the Israel-firster movement? Would that be the extended group largely responsible for lying America into the Iraq war on behalf of Israeli security?

    Sorry, Lasky, "alliances" are give and take enterprises, not one-sided affairs. The more accurate description would be the "Zionist-agenda alliance" comprised of Israelis and their American fifth column. Don’t try to conceal yourself behind rhetoric that in any way implies you’re an American patriot. You may write for the “American Thinker,” but you’re a Zionist propaganda agent and an American traitor, plain and simple.

  3. MM says:

    Oh sage, why did we invade Iraq?

    Oil, WMD's, the grand chessboard, personal vendetta, uhh… 'it was there'… you know…

    Certainly NOT because of any Zionist delusions.

    Otherwise the New York Times would've told me it was so.

Leave a Reply