According to this genealogist/scientist, up to 85 percent of Palestinians have Jewish ancestry. The logical conclusion to this article would be that 85% of the Palestinian refugees should be welcomed home under the Law of Return, and Israel will remain a Jewish state which will please all the Zionists? Whazzat, you say they will not at all be pleased?
-
-
- Rafah march for deteriorating hunger strikers as family appeals for … 0
- Rafah’s nicest tunnel: Siege meets surf in Gaza 2
- Iranian talks fail after neocon ‘blitz’ — as Obama dispatches … 16
- Saving Illinois from Senator Kirk 6
- Human rights activists will hardnose the highway from Woodstock to … 0
- American Zionist responses to Tel Aviv riots– largely indifferent, but … 21
- Division: Romney supporter puts kibosh on Wasserman Schultz appearance at … 3
- US to differentiate between ‘personally displaced’ Palestinian refugees and their … 72
-
- BDS victory: South Africa strips Ahava’s ‘made in Israel’ label 709
- ‘New York Review of Books’ calls it ‘apartheid’ and prepares … 566
- Video: Israeli mob demands all African refugees be deported from … 453
- Neverending Nakba: Israel breaks lull, attacks Gazan farmers 412
- March of the Flags 334
- Day after pogroms, Likud MK calls for internment camp for … 333
- Neocons in Washington Post: Military strike on Iran would ‘calm … 305
- Nabi Saleh’s Bassem Tamimi convicted by Israeli courts based on … 287
-
- The Messiah’s Donkey: Settlers fire on Palestinian villagers as the … 235
- Aharon Appelfeld’s rage at the German language (and Arendt’s need … 156
- March of the Flags 125
- Feeling the hate in Long Island 97
- Israeli judge to issue verdict in Rachel Corrie case 94
- WaPo’s Walter Pincus says US is ‘going above and beyond … 87
- Video: Israeli mob demands all African refugees be deported from … 85
- Bill Kristol celebrates Republican Party purge of ‘oldfashioned Arabists’ Scowcroft, … 83
-
Recent Comments
click link to see last 100 comments- ‘Obama will only go as far on Iran as AIPAC permits him to go’ (29)
- Annie Robbins: very few have really? i heard none had. who’s got their embassy there?
- Sumud: Not Tel Aviv Les, but occupied Jerusalem. Israel has been asking countries to move their embassies to...
- Sumud: It’s all too repulsive lysias – Madeline Albright, the witch who said that the US thinks having...
- Because of all my father and mother did to liberate Europe (I go to the West Bank) (38)
- Annie Robbins: thanks for the links. one, about a speech by President Horst Köhler in 2005. the other , 2006, about...
- Annie Robbins: thanks citizen..i think this segment best represents the article: Having lived in Germany and Austria...
- American Zionist responses to Tel Aviv riots– largely indifferent, but some outrage (21)
- seafoid: I don’t think anyone in a leadership role in the Diaspora wants to acknowledge how badly things have...
- US to differentiate between ‘personally displaced’ Palestinian refugees and their descendants (72)
- Rafah’s nicest tunnel: Siege meets surf in Gaza (2)
- seafoid: Joe You must find the whole situation absurd . there was a video last year of a viva Palestina convoy...
- Annie Robbins: SOOO COOL JOE!
- ‘Obama will only go as far on Iran as AIPAC permits him to go’ (29)
Our Writers
- Philip Weiss

- Adam Horowitz

- Mohammad of Vancouver

- Felson

- Jeffrey Blankfort

- Jack Ross

- Ira Glunts

- Peter Drubetskoy

Blogroll

Indeed, that the Palestinians themselves are the original Jews of Judea, and that European-looking Jews are likely the descendants of European converts, would seem to be beyond stating the obvious. And yet to do so is to invite charges of anti-Semitism…
Well Gellian, if that were to be ever stated on CNN Israel would disappear like a mirage! And for some reason, if it isn’t on CNN Americans don’t know about it.
What a fascinating link.
While it is common sense that many of the Palestinians and Jews would have common ancestry, I had no idea that there were Palestinians who still recalled–in some cases vividly–their families’ Jewish roots.
funny! what will happen to all those who are so attached throwing around anti-semite labels and such?
Its further along than just geneology. A minority (who knows how large) of Palestinians continue to practice some form of Jewish ritual. It could be long residual from before Christian and Moslem waves of occupation, and like the Spanish “conversos” continued some semblance of their Jewish practices.
But, more importantly, the question of attitude towards the “other” is compelling. Any that seek to dispossess others from their homes (both ways), should remember that the person could be a Jew, and/or could be messiah in some form of disguise.
We risk a lot by carelessness and opportunism.
“Any that seek to dispossess others from their homes (both ways), should remember that the person could be a Jew, and/or could be messiah in some form of disguise.”
Witty’s racism, pure and unadulterated. We can surmise that if you dispossess others who AREN’T Jews, it’s permitted. Funny Richard, I would word it more like this.
“should remember that the person could be a human”
FPM
Frankie,
If you see racism in the post, then you are looking for racism only.
In the spirit of “love thy neighbor as thyself”, to regard the other as potentially like you, as potentially the best of you, is the opposite of racism. It destroys racism.
Its how you love the stranger, rather than just rant that I don’t “smoke the same cigarette as you”. (meaning, state it in the same terms).
This is hardly a new concept, seeing as DNA has shown the connection for quite some time. Still, Shlomo Sand’s thesis, “When and How Was the Jewish People Invented?”, expains that, contrary to Israeli myth, Romans didn’t expel whole nations from their territories. He estimates that perhaps 10,000 ancient Judeans were vanquished during the Roman wars, and the remaining inhabitants of ancient Judea remained, converting to Islam and assimilating with their conquerors when Arabs subjugated the area. They became the progenitors of today’s Palestinian Arabs, many of whom now live as refugees.
As interesting as the article itself are the comments, in which one notes an unintended irony. There seems to be an assumption that the basis for a right to live in Israel a religious test. The discussion revolves around the modalities of the religion and the conversion, but by and large it is implicit that if you are a Jew living in the land but convert to another religion, then your property is forfeit. If you are a goy who converts to Judaism, or perhaps are a Russian who has one grandparent descended from someone who converted to Judaism many centuries ago, then you are welcome to come to Israel and live in the house of the descendant of the apostate Jew.
I don’t think Zionism is racist. It is something truly weirder.
And should American taxpayers be subsidizing something requiring a religious test?
“comments” above refers to those after the original Haaretz article, not those here
I read the comments, which show the confusion about the state of Israel. Is it a religious state, or is it an ethnocratic state?
Many commenters said that if the Palestinians converted to Judaism, they would be welcome. Yet secular Jews are welcome even if they don’t believe in God? Soviet Jews who only had a Jewish grandfather were also welcome, even though they’re not technically Jewish under religious law. So what is going on?
I’ve come to the conclusion that Israel now exists solely to keep the Palestinians out and not as a homeland for Jews.
how could Israel be a homeland for Jews when it could never be large enough? I am including all of Palestine since they plan on taking it anyway. It’s still too small! So…another obvious myth just like their so called heritage.
Israel is a national state.
Regardless of whether the Palestinians have Jewish roots or not, they have rights which should be respected.
Looking at some of the comments, its hard to believe that by simply having Jewish blood within them, the Palestinians -or at least 85% of them- have the sympathy of a significant number of the commentators.
In addition, considering that the land had initially been inhabited by the Caanites, the land could also be considered to have been occupied by Jews, God given or not. This is in reference to Richard Witty’s comment.