I was grateful to my mom Wednesday night for telling my wife that she thought our new car is cool looking, and that she likes the green. It’s a 97 Subaru we picked up for $2500, and after signing off on it in the spring, when we saw it in a friend’s driveway, my wife has turned on it now it’s in ours. She hates the green-blue color, hates the drab lines, says it’s an old lady’s car. The truth, which she readily admits, is we’re in our mid-50s and the car is a step down. It embarrasses my wife. She’d like something more flash. I understand this and regret my cheapness. I thought the straightforward goodness of the car (a clean Subaru with 98,000 miles is hard to find at that price) and its dowdiness would play well in my wife’s simple value system. But a wife is hard to figure.
Then Wednesday night, as we were walking from the parking lot to the restaurant, my mom said how good the car looked, and I saw something click. I thought maybe by next week my wife will be over her embarrassment, and not give a hoot.
We ate early to get back for the Obama speech and we talked about Kennedy. We knew he’d be a big part of the speech. My wife asked people how they felt about Kennedy’s death, and my mother, being the staunchest Democrat, was the saddest. My wife was somewhat indifferent. She wondered why there wasn’t more to show for all his health care efforts. I tried to explain his political achievement. Finally my wife folded her hand. She couldn’t add anything to a conversation about his congressional achievements, she admitted.
We talked about Mary Jo Kopechne. My mother is protective of her heroes. She pushed her pro-Kennedy narrative, that Mary Jo Kopechne was asleep and Teddy didn’t know about it and drove off. I said I wondered if a magazine would come out with a big investigation/reprisal of what happened, and if it did, who would read it.
My wife said flatly that she wouldn’t read it. "We know what happened, it’s actually pretty simple. He got in the car with another woman, Mary Jo was in the back seat, she’d gone there to sleep. I do that at parties all the time, go to sleep in a car. He and the other woman escaped the car, but Mary Jo died. He paid off the family."
I never know where my wife’s facts come from. She doesn’t deal in facts the way I do, but it is true that I treasure all her insights. I’m uxorious. It’s a Jewish trait. I believe my wife gravitated to that in me.
I pointed out a couple of implausibilities in my wife’s narrative–I think the second woman would know that Mary Jo was there–and then my father said that Kennedy had changed after that, and cited his letter to the Pope. My wife doubted it.
"The conventional understanding is that people don’t change," she said, daringly; and then to solidify that point, she said she was upset by the William Kennedy Smith case. Everyone in the family knew the kid was a creep but 20 years after Chappaquiddick, Teddy not only went out drinking with him, he came home with him and his son and two girls and went on to bed, thereby leaving the girl in the hands of a drunk monster.
I have two nephews, my wife said, I would have stopped them. An uncle can stop a kid. He didn’t stop him.
My wife had had a cup and a half of wine. My mother hadn’t drunk anything, so she took the Kennedy role, the wheel, and my wife sat in the back. My mother pointed out how lovely the squirters were on the back windshield wiper. My wife said all new cars have great squirters.
Related posts:






{ 19 comments }
Indian summer Mondoweiss…
Phil should be writing novels as well. He has a phenomenal power of observation, and a keen style. Maybe publish something like Richard Russo’s well-reviewed “That Old Cape Magic.”
Phil,
You need to do more of these types of story telling. I enjoy it very much.
Your mother is so considerate of others’ dignity. Tell her I said that.
Mazel Tov on the car. Yesterday I drove to a corporate finance interview in my 96 Corolla with 195,000 miles (which I’m proud of). I was worried who was going to see me get out of the car, and I formed a half-truth about it. “Its my son’s car.”
You have wonderful women in your life. Your mother, your wife, your sisters.
Geez, both you and Phil are nothing to admire in your High School mentalities. I’m thinking, why don’t you both grow up? Too bad both of you were never USA grunts
as that might have helped you grow up; alternatively, if either of you had to depend
only on themselves to attend college, that might have given you maturity too–despite
your friction as between each other, neither of you have a clue about average N America–god, it’s depressing…you all pretend to speak in their name–I think you all mean well, but you are all so off the mark—of course, from the other side, the powern side, the POV is that the average N American IS THE MARK.
Richard,
You have wonderful women in your life. Your mother, your wife, your sisters.
I concur.
If it’s a Forester, I’m very jealous. We used to have a green Forester, and I loved that car until it was totaled by a flying deer. The new Foresters all look rather thuggish, but the older ones are great.
I don’t empathize with any of the commenters so far on your article here, Phil.
And I don’t empathize with your observations or your wife’s in your article.
Yes, aesthetically, some cars offer more to me than others. I guess that’s a kudo to your wife–I mean purely on those grounds.
Otherwise, what am I suppose to glean from this Phil article? Simply that you and your wife are very average human beings and she knows it, but you don’t?
He was drunk at the wheel. He didn’t call the police for 10 hours after the incident. Sounds like enough time to sober up. He got away with it because he was a Kennedy and his apologizzy.
Uxorious. Funny stuff…
Not funny at all. Uxorious? That’s something to brag about when it impacts others beyond yours truly?
I didn’t realize there is a word for zealous fondness or submissiveness to one’s wife. That is hillarious…
Phil’s wife says, according to Phil:
“My wife said flatly that she wouldn’t read it. “We know what happened, it’s actually pretty simple. He got in the car with another woman, Mary Jo was in the back seat, she’d gone there to sleep. I do that at parties all the time, go to sleep in a car. He and the other woman escaped the car, but Mary Jo died. He paid off the family.”
I guess that means that Phil’s wife identifies with Mary Jo, who died while Meathead
was doing what he did, yet at the same time she’s ok with Meathead’s family paying off
the harmed family? Uxorious? Phil, you should ask your wife what ethics and morality
she is displaying because we sure don’t know. That matters less than a crappy image car (although its apparently functional)
in terms of her values?
Poor Phil. You are too old to still be pushed around by women.
But then again, you’ll probably expire without growing up, from what I can see.
BTW, Real Jews, like me and The Litvaks (my all Hebraic motorcycle gang) drive sport-bikes. And nothing smaller than a liter!
This must be a girly-man joke, right? Sounds like The Litvaks’ match is the scooter.
“I never know where my wife’s facts come from. She doesn’t deal in facts the way I do, but it is true that I treasure all her insights”
You are a fucking male-chauvinist pig, aren’t you, Phil? For a guy who is still in terror of his Mom at fifty, that is pathetic.
But just keep insulting your wife in a public blog. She’ll like it.
Whoa, there, Mooser. Where the hell is that coming from?
Mooser sees that Phil is saying he treasures all his wife’s insights although he does not know where her facts ever come from, those supporting her insights. He also
apparently feels no need to find out, ever. If that doesn’t play out like Archie Bunker’s blend of love and disrespect for his TV wife, Edith, what does?
Further, Mooser’s take on Phil’s relationship with his mother is not unfounded, given
what Phil has told us on this blog–he ostensibly merely insults his mother by keeping his own contrary opinions, which is actually not an insult, although his mother might think so. In contrast, he insults his wife apparently by never
even bothering to fact check her and bragging about it here– I’m not sure
what to make about the exchange on the used car and Kennedy by the trio.
It seems Phil’s mom is a doctrinaire liberal, his wife is a middle roader (does she know the pros and cons of Kennedy’s “legislative contributions, e.g., the 1965
Immigration Act?)
and Phil is neither in that he looks more closely than his mother at liberal
politics, especially regarding Israel, while his wife basically goes along with
whatever his pet peeve is at the moment, which in the case of Israeli and USA foreign policy has been, I’m sure she’d agree, a very long moment–Phil has
never given us his wife’s view of USA foreign policy regarding Israel over the last say 40 years–maybe because she’s never had her own opinion, as she had none
on Kennedy’s legislative history? No doubt Phil loves both his mother and wife
unconditionally, and he wants to keep it that way by not arguing with his mother
or eliciting his wife’s opinion, and a follow up to that after she researches the topic–which apparently she has not done. I’m guessing from the fragments Phil gives us.
Post traumatic stress…
Comments on this entry are closed.