CAMERA doth protest too much re its role in Boston anti-mosque campaign

Yesterday CAMERA's Dexter van Zile responded to a post by Jeff Klein critiquing the Israel lobby organization. Klein now responds:

CAMERA apparently didn’t like being mentioned in my piece on the anti-Mosque campaign in Boston. However, their complaint is a good example of their regular method of obfuscation and misdirection. CAMERA responds to something I did not write and proceeds to pick a couple of nits that have no bearing on the thrust (and truth) of the piece.

Here is a more detailed account, which situates CAMERA within a network of Likudnik activists who have been using anti-Islam demagoguery as an organizing tactic in service to Israel. The Boston campaign was a kind of trial run for the extremes of Islamophobic racism that are being marshaled around the so-called “Ground Zero Mosque” in New York. The subject is worthy of a much longer treatment, which I hope to compile sometime in the future.

I wrote that that campaign against the Islamic Society of Boston’s Cultural Center and Mosque in Roxbury “was organized by activists with the far-right pro-Israel David Project and CAMERA, spearheaded by founder Charles Jacobs, who now heads a front group with the Orwellian name “Americans for Peace and Tolerance.” All of this is demonstrably true from court records and discovery documents, as well as public statements and actions by the Mosque opponents. That Charles Jacobs was “only” the co-founder of the BOSTON branch of CAMERA – is a distinction without significance. Whatever the reality of the organization’s existence prior to the late 1980’s, for all intents and purposes CAMERA is headquartered in the Boston “Branch Office,” where a well-funded staff (some also based in Israel) with a six-figure budget turns out pro-Israel reports and tendentious “media criticism.” I doubt if there has ever been a more misleading, oxymoronic title for an organization than the “Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting” – unless it was Charles Jacobs’ most recent creation “Americans for Peace and Tolerance.”

CAMERA is one arm of a wide-ranging network of overlapping organizations, websites and activists in Boston, which share the same rightwing pro-Israel (and increasingly Republican) orientation. Their method – like the Neocon, Islamophobic and Tea Party Right in general -- is to work both publicly and covertly. As in New York and elsewhere, the Boston anti-Mosque effort saw the creation of a supposedly independent grassroots organization to mask the real sources of the campaign. Citizens for Peace and Tolerance was launched in 2004 as a purportedly “interfaith” initiative, represented by a “moderate” Egyptian Muslim scholar, a Zionist Christian lay activist (and David Project speaker) and a relatively unknown Jewish businessman, to hold well-publicized press conferences attacking the ISB. The role of Charles Jacobs in their operation was hidden at first – though his fingerprints are all over the effort. This was the latest in a series of more or less openly pro-Israel boutique initiatives he has launched, including (besides CAMERA and The David Project) The American Anti-Slavery Group, which campaigned against “slavery” and human trafficking in the Arab world and played a role in launching the “SaveDarfur” movement. After Jacobs stepped down as Director of The David Project, he was announced as the “head” of the “new” Americans for Peace and Tolerance -- which was clearly the same organization as the earlier “Citizens” group, with a slightly modified shingle.

It is no wonder that CAMERA is anxious to distance itself publically from some of the activities of Charles Jacobs. The man has become toxic to broad segments of the mainstream and more liberal organizations within the Jewish community, which he actively scorns as not pro-Israel and not pro-Republican enough.

CAMERA itself was not named as one of the defendants in the defamation lawsuit by the ISB but, as I wrote, its activists and supporters were very much involved in the anti-Mosque campaign. The discovery process associated with the ISB suit brought to light a wealth of documents which illustrate a well-oiled anti-Islam publicity operation launched by prominent figures in the Jewish and pro-Israel universe of greater Boston. (It should be noted, however, that a number of progressive Jewish rabbis, activists and organizations supported the ISB project and some eventually signed on to amicus briefs on its behalf; local peace and justice organizations like my organization, Dorchester People for Peace, also took a stand among the Mosque supporters.)

Space here does not allow a full account of the anti-Mosque campaign, but a few examples will give the flavor. In 2002, prominent Boston insurance executive and investor William Sapers learned that the ISB project was being planned adjacent to Roxbury Community College, on whose Board he served as a Trustee. Sapers, a leader of the Combined Jewish Philanthropies and other Jewish communal charities and pro-Israel initiatives, was also one of the financial backers of the CAMERA-produced film based on Dershowitz’s The Case for Israel. He enlisted the notorious “Islamic terrorism expert” Steven Emerson and his “Investigative Project” to dig up dirt on the ISB and feed it to sympathetic reporters at the Boston Herald and Fox-TV. These outlets duly ran a breathless series of “exposes” about the supposed Islamic terrorist threat looming in Boston from the Roxbury ISB project during 2003-4.

Meanwhile, pro-Israel activists set up a number of meetings in the offices of The David Project to map out the on-going “media campaign” (as they called it) and to organize legal harassment against the ISB project.  Among the attendees were -- besides Jacobs, David Project staffer (now Executive Director) Anna Kolodner and Steven Cohen of Citizens for Peace and Tolerance -- prominent local attorneys Jack Feinberg, Michael Segal, Jonathan Leffell (Chairman, New England Friends of the Israeli Defense Forces) and Evan Slavitt (then legal counsel for the Mass Republican Party), William Sapers, “terrorism expert” Ilana Friedman, filmmaker Avi Goldwasser (who produced the notorious smear “Columbia Unbecoming”), Herald/Fox reporter Jonathan Wells – and Josh Katzen, Chairman of the Board of CAMERA!  Many CAMERA activists were later prominent in the noisy and confrontational demonstrations at the ISB Mosque site organized by Charles Jacobs and others. The anti-Islam Boston campaign continues to this day.

There is so much more! Just one additional aspect worth noting here is that the supposedly Liberal Boston Globe employs columnist Jeff Jacoby, who regularly reproduces blatant pro-Israel propaganda and also faithfully trumpeted the smears against the ISB Mosque.  Actually – to the Globe’s shame -- Jacoby is no mere conservative opinionator, but a movement activist, well-connected with the right-wing pro-Israel networks mentioned above and a frequent speaker at their events.  In 2004 he was one of the featured participants at a major international conference organized by CAMERA in suburban Boston on “Israel and the Media: A Global Challenge.”

Incidentally, CAMERA also maintains a Latin American affiliate, Re Vista de Medio Oriente, whose main activity seems to be attacking Hugo Chavez for “anti-Semitism. . ."

Posted in Israel Lobby, Israel/Palestine, Middle East

{ 9 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. Well done, the more the anti-democratic credentials of these extremists is exposed the better. That they don’t like it speaks volumes. They are only one example of the networks which ceaselessly attempt to bias public opinion and prevent an informed, open debate. In a genuine democracy, transparency is essential – what have these people got to hide?

  2. annie says:

    breathtaking scope in your report jeff. i’m going to be following all your links and i’ve bookmarked this for future reference.

  3. annie says:

    btw, when i googled Charles Jacobs the first link is to his website Charles Jacobs . org which opens w/an interview of him by the racist frontpage magazine focusing on jacobs series …. on the ADL and its failure to deal with Islamic anti-Semitism. apparently going after fozman for not being anti islam enough is one of his missions. according to jacobs there’s a “gentlemen’s agreement” between Jewish leaders about not being critical of other Jewish leaders, iow jewish leaders aren’t free to fly their racist flag because of those nasty righteous jews. (ok, he doesn’t say that). here’s what he says

    This is a structural problem, harmful to Jewish interests because this code of silence, this Jewish omerta, blocks public discussion of Jewry’s most urgent and serious matters: where is our leadership is taking us, how are our limited communal resources allocated? In this case, it was widely understood by people deeply knowledgeable that the ADL failure to adjust to the new threat profile was extraordinarily harmful, but nobody could break the silence. I myself only could do it after I left the David Project and became freed of organizational constraints. By the way, all the people who knew but couldn’t say are rooting me on.

    the ‘new threat profile’ of course being islam

    Finally, I was sent a recent video interview on NewsMax [1] where Abe now says that “fundamentalist extremist Islam is the greatest threat” we face. Good. I hope it’s a start.

    FP: Why do you think most Jewish leaders and organizations are so hesitant to confront the threat of radical Islam?

    Jacobs: There are three reasons: First is a fear of being attacked as racists, bigots and Islamophobes – a line of attack that has been particularly effective against Jewish organizations.

    fear of being attacked as racists, bigots and Islamophobes??? gee, ya think.

  4. Keith says:

    JEFF- Fine expose of Zionist agitprop!

  5. mok says:

    I don’t like CAMERA. As Jeff wrote, their title is an oxymoron. They should change it to Committee for the Aspersion of Middle East Reporting that is Accurate.

    They once went after a British tabloid because one of their reporters was, apparently, an ISM volunteer. If the CAMERA extremists are allowed to have their say, why not everyone else? I’m a big fan of Christiane Amanpour purely because she gets on CAMERA’s tits – never actually seen any of her reports.

  6. syvanen says:

    Jeff

    Excellent research. You mention the “Save Darfur” movement that was urging the US to militarily intervene and imply it was backed by pro Israeli forces. This was something that I always suspected but found it difficult to document. The only evidence I saw was when the Washington Holocaust Museum declared a genocide in Darfur. Then there was a major PR firm (supported by whom?) pushing the case for intervention. I would definitely be interested in hearing more from you on this topic.

    Of course, Darfur is a very back burner topic right now but 2003-2004 or so there was a real movement in this country urging the US to intervene militarily. I believe it was only with the war in Iraq going south that killed this idea. One day there was this big “movement”, the next day, the issue was gone. But this issue is still there (Kristoff of the NYT being the major voice) and an upsurge in violence in the S. Sudan or Darfurian civil wars could bring it back to the attention of our war party.

    • Jeff Klein says:

      Zionist organizations and Jewish communal groups were very prominent in building and sustaining the so-called SaveDarfur movement. There is a lot of information available on this, which would be worth publicizing more widely. People like Charles Jacobs were actively promoting the issue with an eye toward discrediting an Arab country and stirring up anti-Islam sentiment.
      Of course there were also sincere people who were concerned with the human suffering from civil war and ethnic conflict. However the framing of the issue — particularly as “Arabs” oppressing Africans — was the product of an ideological campaign promoted very consciously by people with a pro-Israel agenda. The American Anti-Slavery Group, founded by Jacobs, was certainly part of this operation.

      • syvanen says:

        Thanks. Keep your notes up to date, this issue could pop up again.

        Your comment reminds me why I first became very suspicious of the free Darfur movement. It was the “Arabs” oppressing “Africans” angle. Both sides in this civil war were Moslem, both spoke Arabic at least as their second language (numerous tribal toungues) and both sides were classically Nubian, that is a very dark skinned African people. Their separation into “Arab” and “African” was pure invention for western audiences. Now who would create this fiction?

      • lyn117 says:

        I don’t wish at all to downplay the real suffering of the people of Darfur, which during the civil war was I’m sure worse than in Palestine. I to got suspicious of the “Save Darfur” movement when I saw on TV someone recounting how black women who had been raped by the janjaweed had been told they would have “little white babies.” Of course, the janjaweed as everyone knows are just as black as anyone else, so it was utterly weird, and I too thought there was a campaign afoot to discredit Arabs. A couple years ago there was an article in Haraatz about some Darfur rebels meeting with Israeli leaders in Israel. Again weird.

Leave a Reply