Tony Judt passes

We've heard that Tony Judt died today, the historian and writer/speaker, after a long illness, ALS. A giant, is all I can think right now, someone of tremendous intellectual confidence who followed such a worldly and erudite path that when the Israel/Palestine issue came front and center in political life ten years ago knew what he thought and wasn't afraid to say it. A leader, who made it so much easier for the rest of us to tag along.

About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.
Posted in Israel/Palestine

{ 44 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. annie says:

    a true giant and much loved. good bye tony, i will always remember you and your honest bravery.

  2. eGuard says:

    One of the men who taught me to think harder. Just: do more thinking. Do more mind-checking. And stand upright.

    Thanks, Tony.

  3. Sand says:

    Very Sad. But he made his mark.

  4. Oscar says:

    Tony, your influence is only starting to be felt. A giant among men.

  5. Condolences to his family, friends and admirers.

  6. Sand says:

    unfortunately… badly cut… but interesting what he had to say… regarding his meeting with a Senator in a Paris hotel.

    The Israeli Lobby – A Danger To The World – Banned Documentary (4/5)
    link to youtube.com

  7. Comfort and condolences to those who loved Tony Judt. A spirit and a man of courage, one to be proud of.
    Go well umfundisi.

  8. Bill NYC says:

    It’s just a terrible, terrible loss.

  9. Shunra says:

    What sad news.

    His memory will be cherished by many admiring strangers as the many, many personal friends that he made over the years.

  10. Avi says:

    Today, the world may have lost Tony Judt, but his body of work lives on.

  11. loss for all of those who seeks ethical clarity in complex issues.

  12. lohdennis says:

    Tony Judt was wise AND courageous. I never got to know him personally but I read three of his books: Postwar, Reappraisals, and The Burden of Responsibility. All three books profoundly influenced me, especially the first two of these books. In fact, I’m reading Postwar(for the fourth time right now). To me, what distinguished Tony Judt from many others whom I respect is his courage, a remarkably rare attribute these days. He is in my personal pantheon of “greats” with Chomsky, Said, Carter, and Hass.

  13. RoHa says:

    Tony Judt was a clear and powerful voice. We’ll miss him.

  14. VR says:

    Anything that I say will not really do justice to the character and work of Mr. Judt, a man that I greatly admire and hence my real struggle for words. I second most of what was said here already and add that I really appreciated his mind and manner of communication, in the face of great odds. His sense of justice was clear, his appeal to the right course of action unwavering, and he delivered it with no respect of persons. It is the result of having a world view which truly embraces the entire world, that I find extremely rare, an acceptance of all upon the basis of common humanity. How he fiercely rushed to the side of the wounded, because it was the right thing to do, as amply expressed in this following video –

    TONY JUDT ON ACADEMIC FREEDOM, AND MUCH MORE

    How I wished we could have rushed in and rescue him from his recent agony and plight, but we do not have the means – and as we approached him, he reminded us to be brave and to do what was right, to do our duty.

  15. Eva Smagacz says:

    I am grieving. There are few I admired as much as Tony Judd. Loss of tremendous intelect and remarkable clarity of vision.

  16. Huge loss of a brilliant and a conscientious mind; A promoter of a bi-national state vision which in 2006 drew him an avalanche of the most despicable smears from the usual obnoxious crowd and earned him a sacking from the editorial board of the New Republic..He, the British Jew who early on at the age of 15 helped British Jews to migrate to Palestine and who later in the aftermath of 1967 war volunteered to serve in the IDF as a driver and a translator (well before correcting his course to talk in defense of the Palestinian cause) , was accused of “Anti-Semitism ” and Jew-hatred”, no less!!!
    But that didn’t end there. Later on in 2006, the same packs of hyenas of the ADL and the AJC, successfully prevented to prevent him from public speaking in New York:

    On October 4, 2006, Judt’s scheduled New York talk before the organization Network 20/20 was abruptly cancelled after Polish Consul Krzysztof Kasprzyk suddenly withdrew his offer of a venue following telephone calls from the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee. The consul later told a reporter that “I don’t have to subscribe to the First Amendment.”[35] According to The New York Sun, “the appearance at the Polish consulate was canceled after the Polish government decided that Mr. Judt’s views critical of Israel were not consistent with Poland’s friendly relations with the Jewish state.”[36]

    According to the Washington Post, the ADL and AJC had complained to the Polish consul that Judt was “too critical of Israel and American Jewry,” though both organizations deny asking that the talk be canceled. ADL National Chairman Abraham Foxman called Judt’s claims of interference “wild conspiracy theories.” Kasprzyk told the Washington Post that “the phone calls were very elegant but may be interpreted as exercising a delicate pressure. That’s obvious — we are adults and our IQs are high enough to understand that.” Judt, who had planned to argue that the Israel lobby in the US often stifled honest debate, called the implications of the cancellation “serious and frightening.” He added that “only in America — not in Israel — is this a problem,” charging that vigorous criticism of Israeli policy, acceptable in Israel itself, is taboo in the US. Of the ADL and AJC, he said, “These are Jewish organizations that believe they should keep people who disagree with them on the Middle East away from anyone who might listen.”

    The cancellation brought support from a roster of academics and intellectuals who said there had been an attempt to intimidate and shut down free debate – seeming to Judt’s supporters to prove the point that Judt had wanted to make.[38] Mark Lilla and Richard Sennett wrote a letter to Foxman in protest, which was signed by 114 people and published in the New York Review of Books.

    In a later exchange on the subject in the New York Review of Books, Lilla and Sennet argued that “Even without knowing the substance of those ‘nice’ calls from the ADL and AJC, any impartial observer will recognize them as not so subtle forms of pressure.”
    link to en.wikipedia.org

  17. Jim Haygood says:

    RIP. The Lobby will not have Tony Judt to attack anymore. But, to its horror, a hundred of Tony’s intellectual acolytes will rise in his stead.

  18. lobewyper says:

    A man of decency, honesty, and intellectual integrity–a true role model.

  19. Pamela Olson says:

    I feel this loss like a kick to the stomach. Prof. Judt was so brave, so far ahead of his time, so fearlessly honest, unafraid to call a spade a spade (and to call out those who would stifle honest debate by insisting spades were fluffy pink hearts and excommunicating anyone who publicly disagreed).

    He was so gracious when I emailed him, even though he didn’t know me, and asked about his adventures in publishing on this ‘controversial’ topic. I will never forget this kindness, which was such a morale booster when I was feeling particularly weary about the whole thing.

    Rest in the peace of eternity knowing you were a great teacher on this good earth and a kind and gracious human being.

  20. Les says:

    I shall remember him as a vigorous participant in the debates going on around him allowing him to triumph over his terribly disabling illness. A brave, brave man filled with a lust for the intellectual life to the very end.

  21. lohdennis says:

    If anyone is interested in working with me to organize a get-together centered on Tony Judt to discuss his life, work, and influence, please let me know via email: lohdennis@gmail.com.

    It will probably have to be in October or November but I am very interested in continuing his legacy, even in a small way. It will take place in NYC.

  22. Citizen says:

    From the LA Times obituary:

    After spending a summer on a kibbutz in Israel when he was 15, Judt was active in the Jewish youth movement but turned away from the Zionists’ utopian vision when he spent several weeks as a translator after the Six-Day War in 1967. He was troubled by the insouciance of Israeli officers he worked with and later called them “right-wing thugs with anti-Arab views.”

  23. jonah says:

    Sincere condolences to his family and friends.

    I respect the diversity of his position on Israel and the Middle East conflict, but certainly I do not agree with his conclusions. I wish therefore to give space to some critical thoughts about his views on the issue, sure that he would not have objected to a healthy dissent, the quintessence of the very idea of democracy.

    link to covenant.idc.ac.il

    • Chaos4700 says:

      Just how much white phosphorous constitutes healthy dissent? Just out of curiosity.

    • “Sincere condolences to his family and friends.”

      Sincere you said? Allow me to doubt..He was a thorn in your flesh and judging from the indignant, shameless propaganda you keep spewing over here, you had no sympathy for someone like Judt..

    • Shingo says:

      “I wish therefore to give space to some critical thoughts about his views on the issue”

      I read Benjamin Balint’s essay, and it’s a cler case of and intellectual David trying to slay a Goliath and failing miserably.

      To his credit, he is civlized and thotough in researchign Judt’s work, but strangely, seems to believe that laying out Judt’s thesis is inteself a refutation. It’s a rather bizzare essay and no doubt intended to preach to the converted.

      In other arguments, he demonstrated btatant dihonesty, when tried to refute the argument that a state cannot be both Jewish and democratic. He dredges up the very lame position that Israel is both because it is Jewish as a conseuqnece of the consensus of the majorit of the population, while deliberately skipping over the elephant in the room that Israel achived the majority and maintains it by ethnic cleansing.

      he expects his reasders to believe that Israel’s Declaration of Independence, which promises that the state will act for the benefit of all its inhabitants, is somehow evidence that this is what Israel is doing, which is absurd.

      The rest of the piece doesn’t get much better and is best described as an intellectual train wreck.

      So typical of Zionists.

  24. Certain names stick in my mind as truth-tellers on the IP conflict.

    Tony Judt was undeniably at the top of the list.

  25. Nevada Ned says:

    When he was a youngster, Judt was one of the top organizers in the UK for the Israelis. He was a true believer. That makes his evolution into a strong critic of Israeli policy more impressive. Some of Israeli’s other critics never started off as believers in the first place.

  26. rachelgolem says:

    “Intellectuals” come and go, Israel is forever!!!!!

Leave a Reply