Yuli Edelstein at the Park Slope Food
Co-op last December (Photo: Stop BDS at
the Park Slope Food Coop)
Advocates for Israel are crowing over their victory this week at the Park Slope Food Co-op, as a measure that would have put the question of boycotting Israeli products to a vote failed, 60-40.
But when you look closely at the forces aligned against the Park Slope Food Co-op Members for BDS, it becomes clear that the pro-BDS forces were outmatched in resources and political clout--which makes the 40% vote garnered that much more impressive. What would the vote have been without the distorting noise that preceded it?
The Jewish Week’s Doug Chandler reports on how the “drive to defeat a proposed boycott of Israeli goods...resembled an election campaign”:
One reason for the size of the crowd was the concerted effort mounted by a number of groups to boost the attendance of pro-Israel members of the co-op, said Poupko, director of Israel and international affairs at the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York.
JCRC worked with rabbis in Brownstone Brooklyn and More Hummus, Please, the co-op faction opposed to BDS, to draw attention to the vote and craft the right message, Poupko said. In essence, she added, the message conveyed the idea “that BDS does nothing to promote peace and that it’s bad for the co-op.”
Toward that end, the ad-hoc coalition of groups distributed flyers, posters, e-mail blasts and postcards with the same design and the same language. Aimed at appealing to a progressive audience, a large part of Brownstone Brooklyn, the material said, “Say yes to a Jewish state. Yes to a Palestinian state. No to BDS...”
In the past few days, JCRC also solicited statements from elected officials in the area denouncing the BDS movement, Poupko said. Among the nine leaders who provided statements are U.S. Reps. Jerrold Nadler and Yvette Clarke, both Democrats who represent parts of Brownstone Brooklyn.
So the loss for BDS advocates becomes a lot more clearer after reading that. They were up against the full force of the Israel lobby in New York, which successfully partnered with Park Slope-area “progressives” to defeat BDS activists.
The JCRC, as I’ve explained here, is an influential organization that has close ties to New York’s ruling establishment. The fact that they successfully solicited statements against BDS from elected officials, probably with little effort, is a demonstration of their influence. Their budget last year was over $3 million, and they are part of the Israel Action Network, the $6 million initiative created at the urging of the Israeli government that aims to combat BDS efforts.
The JCRC wasn’t the only organization that worked with anti-BDS Co-op members to defeat the measure for a referendum on boycotting Israeli products. The Anti-Defamation League and Stand With Us, the right-wing Israeli government-linked group, also played a role in organizing against BDS efforts, according to the Israel Action Network.
It was hardly a fair fight. Sure, pro-BDS members of the Co-op had some prominent backing from the likes of Alice Walker, but that’s hardly enough to combat the full force of the lobby, which successfully persuaded elected officials to come out strongly against the boycott. It's likely the vote would have been a lot closer had Barbara Mazor, the leader of the Co-op's anti-BDS "More Hummus, Please" group, not had the help of deep-pocketed and influential organizations.
All of this is to say that the defeat of the BDS measure at Park Slope does not bode well for the Israel lobby. The money and time spent, and connections to elected officials, did not mean an overwhelming victory for those against BDS.
Kiera Feldman makes this point in an excellent piece for The Nation:
Here’s the thing: It doesn't actually matter if the Coop boycotts Israel or not. Just having the debate is a symbolic victory for the pro-boycott camp. It might once have been safe to assume that in Park Slope, Brooklyn, progressive Jews would side with their more conservative co-religionists on matters pertaining to Israel. No longer.
Back in December, Israeli Minister of Information and Diaspora Yuli Edelstein, a settler who calls the colony of Neve Daniel home, paid the coop a visit. A few rows away from the shelves of settlement-made Sodastream, Edelstein posed for a picture holding a tub of Sabra Humus and a bag of vegan marshmallows (part Israeli-owned and Israeli manufactured, respectively). Edelstein’s visit cemented an inescapable truth: the Park Slope Food Coop had officially become a key site for BDS organizing and opposition, a success in and of itself for the BDS movement. BDS had permeated even Park Slope--"the heart of the Jewish crunchy liberal establishment," in the tongue-in-cheek words of Jewish Voice for Peace activist Jesse Bacon...
Feldman rightly concludes:
If BDS has no capacity to exert governmental pressure, then why are Israeli officials—those who are invested in protecting the status quo—so afraid that they had to outlaw BDS in Israel last summer? One Israeli diplomat termed BDS “a practical warhead on the tip of an ideological rocket.”
Over the last week, Mayor Michael Bloomberg, City Council speaker (and 2013 mayoral hopeful) Christine Quinn, public advocate Bill de Blasio, Senator Charles Schumer, and a long list of other non-Coop members clamored to pass New York’s Israel loyalty test by denouncing the Coop boycott campaign. If the Coop boycott is now at the top of the test, then BDS has really gone mainstream. It didn’t matter which way the vote went Tuesday night, because, as soon as this debate erupted in Park Slope, the boycotters had already won.
“Say YES to Palestine, say Yes to Israel, vote FOR BDS.”
A slogan for next time. But there must be an explanation, too, to appeal to progressive Jews in Brooklyn. The explanation is this:
I consider it a victory whenever I can get anybody I meet to even chat for a a minute or two about the Palestinians–ditto concerning American foreign policy in the Middle East for, hey, up to five minutes.
It was hardly a fair fight.
It is as fair as any effort to fight the Zionist lobby. They have more money than we do and they will spend it in political campaigns. That just goes with the territory.
Here’s the thing. . . It doesn’t matter whether the vote for a boycott of Israeli goods passed or not. There’s already ostensibly a partial boycott of Israeli goods at the co-op — by the 40% who voted in favor of the boycott. Even if Israeli goods show up on the shelf, 40% of co-op members will steer clear.
And so it goes for many of the rest of us. We quietly boycott Israeli goods. We will not participate in any cultural events that attempt to whitewash the occupation. The goods may appear on the shelf, but we disregard them.
I’ve been doing the same with the New York Times since Judith Miller lied us into permanent war in the Middle East eight years ago. Cancelled my subscription and made certain not a dime went to promote its neo-con agenda since then.
Americans need to be reminded that they are the ones paying at the gas pump for Obama’s capitulation to the Israel Lobby for the sanctions, the lobby, not we, called for.
the israel lobby may show a happy face about the park slope co-op vote but privately they have to be plenty worried about the 40% yes vote. perhaps the big surprise is that so many co-op members showed up to vote. after all the measure they voted on had to do with some little known product from what to most americans is a remote part of the world. for the bds advocates perhaps their most difficult task was convincing co-op members that the election had anything to do with them. but had the measure that was put before them been whether they are in favor of our government’s ending its 3 billion dollar annual giveaway to israel and, instead, using the dollars thereby saved to support public education, is there any doubt as to how the voting would have gone? why? because such a measure would turn a little understood conflict somewhere in the mideast into a domestic issue. that way we’d be taking advantage of the natural tendency of the (any) public to think first in terms of what’s good for their country, and what could better for america than putting an end to our governments 3 billion dollar giveaway to israel?
at the same time said referendum could call for ending the 1.5 billion dollar giveaway to the egyptian military.
I voted for the boycott, and against Israeli apartheid, but if we want to win this thing let’s look at it clear. BDS used all the influence it could, and so did the right-wing zio-nazis. I doubt if we had equal money and influence the vote would have gone any differently. The neighborhood and the membership has changed and another vote will probably be a worse turnout for us.
And nobody at the coop gives two craps about what Bloomberg says about the coop. We’re more independent than that.
What bugs me is that no one reported the speaker impersonating Norman Finkelstein! He got up there and spouted all these lies about what BDS is and claimed to be Finkelstien! Why is the coop not up in arms about that?
Could you explain more about the fake Finkelstein?
I had no idea about this.
he’s pulling your leg cliff.
pssg, do a little googling around, i already read about finklestein’s participation a few times, it hasn’t been ignored.
I voted for the boycott
uh huh, sure you did. i’m not clear what the point of your post is. you say if we want to win this thing let’s look at it clear, so please elucidate how informing us, iyho, how another vote will probably be a worse turnout for us will help ‘us’ win? what kind of clarity are you offering? and if what you say is true then why not have a vote of all the members? one might think if your speculations were true a members vote would be another nail in the coffin, not a threat.
you may recall stand with us didn’t want a members vote in olympia either and tried suing instead.
I’m not sure I follow what you’re saying.
You suspect I didn’t vote for the boycott based on…what?
I didn’t mention anything about how anything would help us win. I mentioned that another vote would turn out worse. We have to look at it clearly: the neighborhood is changing, and membership doesn’t care so much about the Palestinians except to feel sorry for them. They don’t feel responsible.
Are you a member of the coop, Anne? Is anyone here a member? When someone comes out and says, “40% of the membership voted for the boycott”, they obviously have no idea what they’re talking about. Where does the man who said, ‘I am 100% for the vote, but 100% against BDS” fit in to your calculations? I don’t think a single one of you has any knowledge of how the PSFC parliamentary procedure works. Grousing about how we lost, and pretending that we won, won’t get us anywhere. I’m sorry I can’t tell you what will work, but I can tell you what doesn’t, and what hasn’t.
Your response about Finkelstien, his participation hasn’t been ignored, is not clear. Can you please elucidate?
“Why not have a vote by all the members?” Good idea! But the Coop voted against it. They didn’t want to know about it. Like I said, the neighborhood is changing.
if we want to win this thing let’s look at it clear……I didn’t mention anything about how anything would help us win.
obviously. so why are you here? oh right, you told us: I can’t tell you what will work, but I can tell you what doesn’t, and what hasn’t.
here’s the thing, i’m not really interested in what you think hasn’t worked. get back to me when you have some suggestions other than standing down. btw, i already asked once ” how informing us, ‘another vote will probably be a worse turnout for us’ will help ‘us’ win? ” but guess what? we already know your answer to that…it won’t. nothing you say is geared toward anything other than demeaning us, this is the kind of ‘help’ you’re offering. the kind of help that says ‘stop what you are doing’, preferably ASAP. got it, i’ll take a pass on your ‘advice’. and if first we don’t succeed we’ll try try again.
Then pass. Stop listening, keep losing, and pass. If that’s your idea of winning, that is.