Activism

Eisner, new poster boy for occupation, says you can’t look good for the camera when you’re fighting ‘anarchists’

Updated:

This is the latest from Ynet on the incident that has shocked the world:

Lt. Col. Shalom Eisner, an officer who was suspended from the IDF after hitting a leftist protester from Denmark, said in a conversation with a supporter that he never put “anyone’s life in danger.”

“What’s more important, fulfilling the task or looking good for the camera?” he said in a chat that was broadcast on Channel 10 News. “I am familiar with these anarchists’ history. They came with sticks and broke my hand, but no one talks about that or films that. It’s true; some of the pictures look bad. I used my weapon coldly, like a stick. I didn’t kill anyone, and didn’t put anyone’s life at risk.” (Ynet)

I have been reading the Hebrew press’s coverage of the rifle-bashing incident on Saturday, in which Israeli lieutenant colonel Shalom Eisner struck a Danish activist in the face in the Jordan Valley and the video went viral.

Eisner was interviewed yesterday for an hour and stuck by his version that he was attacked. Some reporters caught up with him leaving a synagogue near his house this morning and then later outside his house. He said he was under orders not to talk. He appeared with his hand bandaged. Answering a question from a reporter said that the hand hurt a bit.

Ynet stated, quoting army sources, that Eisner may be dismissed but then given another position. The only interesting quote from Ynet:

Lieutenant Colonel Eisner was asked if he was angry at someone and he responded: “What is there to be angry about? To be angry would be to punish yourself for stupidities of others.”

To the question, whose stupidities?, he answered “it is forbidden to relate to this now.”

I like the “now” part. Maybe that is a promise of news to come. Ynet has the interviews, a picture of Eisner with his bandage and another video of the incident (not too much on it).

And Ilene Cohen notes:

Eisner clutched and handled his weapon on Saturday (both during the smack and afterward) with hand unbandaged and in control, fingers on both hands nicely wrapped around the gun (he also opened the car door in this latest video with no problem).

11 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

RE: “Bandaged and smiling, Eisner blames others’ ‘stupidities

ALSO SEE: Former soldiers rush to defense of officer who hit activist, By Ilan Ben Zion, Times of Israel, 4/16/12

(excerpt). . . Initial findings showed that Eisner decided not to use crowd control measures, even though they were at his disposal. The Border Police contingent that was summoned to assist Eisner and his men did not arrive because they were dealing with another incident. One of Eisner’s soldiers was supposed to record the incident, but the battery in his camera died before the flare-up began.
Eisner repeated his claim that he was attacked and wounded by one of the protesters, but admitted that retaliating was unnecessary.
Bakr Abdul-Haq, the Palestinian cameraman who videotaped the incident, told Ynet News that Ayas didn’t attack Eisner; Eisner had said he “thought” Ayas attacked him from behind, breaking his fingers.
Abdul-Haq, a writer and photographer for Nablus TV, said that a Civil Administration officer was in Kfar Ouja and tried to manage a dialogue with the protesters, but Eisner began hitting the activists. Abdul-Haq also claims to possess the complete video footage of the incident which shows that Ayas never struck Eisner.
“[Ayas] stood in place and [Eisner] suddenly approached and hit him with his rifle. I am prepared to give all the video material to anyone who will investigate the incident and bring the truth to light,” he said.

ENTIRE ARTICLE – http://www.timesofisrael.com/former-soldiers-rush-to-eisners-defense/

P.S. A COUPLE OF COMMENTS MADE TO THE HAARETZ ARTICLE “Activist beaten by IDF officer: Claim protesters were violent is ‘a complete lie'”, by Gili Cohen, 4/16/12
Speaking with Haaretz, Danish national Andreas Ias says IDF’s claim that protesters were violent are untrue

[3.] Prof.Dr.Karen van Dyeken 16.04.1217:09
. . . I have been there on the side of the IDF, this yound man was not at all connected with these demonstrators and had nothing to do with the injury of the officers. This injury was sustained prior to this incident and the bandage was there before the officer came on the scene

[7.] Prof.Dr.Karen van Dyeken 16.04.1217:06
thats not a way to defuse the situation, this officer is a rogue and should be courtmartialled

SOURCE – http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/activist-beaten-by-idf-officer-claim-protesters-were-violent-is-a-complete-lie-1.424572

So if there’s no camera around, they have carte blanche to attack, kidnap and hurt people. The only fault was being seen on camera, and no doubt that was all planned by those dastardly protesters who upset the occupying bullies so much.How typical, instead of showing some remorse or self-awareness, the classic Israeli response is to deny, lie and go on the attack. Like a child caught out they will say anything, with the conviction that the indulgent parents will absolve them of any duty to telling the truth or acknowledging their role in injustice.

yeah, someone should tell him when he’s trying to convince the world his hand is damaged not to favor it automatically when opening the car door while he’s being being recorded. i hurt my hand in an accident once and hardly used it for 1/2 year. especially not a couple days later. then he slams the car door shut with it too. what’s he thinking? he’s so full of himself he forgot.

I wouldn’t make too much of the “stupidities of others” part, both because Eisner was just using a common aphorism, and because the Ynet transcript is wrong.

Q: Are you angry with anyone in particular?
Eisner: No, we’re not spending our time getting angry.
Q: With that activist who …
Eisner: Do you know what getting angry is? It’s punishing yourself for the nonsense of others.
Q: Whose nonsense?
Eisner: No one’s, but that’s why I’m not angry.

The warrior Jews get all clammed up when they have to explain themselves to the world on camera and in English .

It all makes sense in Hebrew. The land is worshipped. It justified the offering of Jewish ethics . “Palestinians” don’t even belong there. Foreigners who support the Arabs are deluded anti semites.
Eisener is just a grunt. Danon and Bibi call the shots and they are not coy about what has to be done to “redeem” the land.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPVTC9frqMA