Not an empty sand dune: A Palestinian mansion in downtown Tel Aviv

Israel/Palestine
on 18 Comments
IMG 0700
The “Red House,” a Palestinian well house once belonging to the Murad family in the Shapira neighborhood of Tel Aviv. (Photo: Red House resident)

The neighborhoods of Shapira and Neve Sha’anan are not the White City of Tel Aviv guidebooks. Although they are central bordering main bus station, these are the parts of town where cracks in concrete do not get fixed and certain streets are avoided on warm days because of a stench of urine that never washes away.

To the east of Tel Aviv’s bus station are blocks of African refugees hawking shoes and old kitchenware from soft blankets atop the pavement, which double as storefronts. And on the west side there are sporadic mid-night Molotov cocktails hurled into asylum seekers homes. There are also blue-collar Bukhari Jews and migrant workers, living examples of Israel’s legal and non-legal immigration history. But crumbling between the 1960s era homes and recently fabricated tin structures is a ghost of Israel’s past: a Palestinian mansion only a five-minute walk from the nexus of the city’s transport system.

Dubbed the “Red House” by architects and former graduate students at Tel Aviv University this structure serves as a reminder that Israel’s first city was not built from empty sand dunes. And now the future of the Red House, a marker of four Palestinian villages that were destroyed after Israel declared independence in 1948 may be just as dim as its past. The municipality set to purchase the property sometime this year, which could signal historical preservation, or demolition.

IMG 2682
Veranda. (Photo: Red House resident)
IMG 4340
Interior tiles. (Photo: Red House resident)

Today the Red House is inhabited by a rotating microcosm of Tel Aviv’s south side population. The upstairs is home to a group of activists from the radical-left. On the lower floor is an unregulated kindergarten for refugees and rented flats, where sleeping quarters stretch into a grassy yard.

“My friends in 2006 were looking for a cheap house and found it [the Red House] and then looked in the municipality book and contacted the owner,” said the resident who wished to remain anonymous. After the young Israelis moved in they made some repairs to the building, but kept in tact the original aesthetic of the building. In most of the bedrooms the original wallpaper can be seen and painted tiles cover almost the entire floor space.

The Red House is a “well house,” or a large agricultural home once used by wealthy orange growers. Constructed over 150 years ago the Red House is one of 60 well houses that remain from the late Ottoman, early Mandate period. But in 1948 these structures were taken over by the Israeli authorities and eventually many were abandoned. When the activists found the Red House of Shapira it showed signs of renovation from approximately 40 years ago, but looked more like heroin den then a lavish home. And one room had damage from a fire.

“This kind of thing was popular in the 70s and 80s this kind of disgusting painting,” said one of the activists pointing to stucco in what is now his bedroom. New walls added during the previous renovations period cut in extra rooms, including bathrooms. “It was the only house in this area,” he continued “people say they must have been a rich family to have such a house.”

Around the same time the activists moved into the Red House professors and graduate students at Tel Aviv University’s David Azrieli School of Architecture also came across well houses in the south part of the city. Under the direction of Naor Mimar, Amnon Bar Or and Sergio Lerman the team published a report in 2007. They documented before 1948 Tel Aviv and Jaffa boasted around 200 of these structures, but today only some 60 structures remained.

Concurrent to Tel Aviv University’s research, Zochrot, the Israeli organization dedicated to remembering the Palestinian nakba, or 1947-49 displacement, also mapped out Palestinian sites in the Jewish city. Zochrot then attempted to contact the original owners of the Red House. Through their research they were able to uncover the Murad family once lived there and during the nakba they fled to Jordan. The organization has since tried to track down the original owners, but to no avail.

zochrot
Destroyed Palestinian villages, and remaining structures in Tel Aviv. (Map: Zochrot)
TelAviv1927
“Map of Mandate, 1927.” Blue indicates “existing structures, 2008″ red indicates “well houses, 1927.” (Map: Tel Aviv University)

When looking at the final mapped results of both Zochrot’s and Tel Aviv University’s pinning of former Palestinian houses, it becomes clear that capital of Jewish culture in Israel/Palestine was not virgin land. On the contrary the well houses show the area was fertile agricultural land with the canonical empty sand dunes of Nathan Gutman paintings only on the open coastline. Four Palestinian villages, (Salama, Shaykh Muwnnis, Jammasin al-Gharbi and Summayl) comprised the southern, central and northern parts of the city, respectively.

Still the resurgent interest in the well houses has not softened the ire aroused by articulating Israel’s Palestinian past. Last April Zochrot tried to organize a reading of the names of Palestinian sites in Tel Aviv, but police arrested some of the activists and confined others to their office. Even though the event was forcibly canceled, a mob of Israelis congregated outside of Zochrot’s doors to protest.

Historical preservation and the Red House’s uncertain future

In 2008 Tel Aviv University took their findings on the well houses public. To lobby the city for preservation measures the researchers held an exhibition that summer. “The goal of the exhibition is to put the well houses on the agenda, so the municipality will not roll its eyes and say they do not merit conservation,” said Bar Or to Haaretz days before the gallery opening. Unlike Zochrot, Bar Or and the research team’s motivations to preserve the well houses were not altruistically to seal a place for Palestinians in this city’s foundation.

“After all, conservation is memory. The cultivation of the Bauhaus heritage has made people forget what is not seen and not preserved. It makes no difference to me that some people claim that to preserve these houses is to anchor the history of the Palestinians,” continued Bar Or.

Even more, students of Bar Or (Oded Bitan, Hila Ron and Tamar Nativ) arranged tours of a handful of the disintegrating mansions in a city-sponsored event. Annually the Tel Aviv municipality hosts “Houses from Within,” where architecturally interesting houses open their doors for visitors. Scrolling through the list of previous years’ houses, most are the residences of urban artists, some of which are even former Palestinian homes in Jaffa. But the well houses stand apart from the other listings because they are the only grouping of buildings showcased for the uniqueness of being former Palestinian homes in the heart of Tel Aviv.

By 2012 enough interest was galvanized around the Palestinian homes to prompt Tel Aviv to pass preservation legislation on the well houses. Yet codifying these types of repairs is relatively new to Israel, despite the abundance of historical sites—and state protection for homes specifically because of their Palestinian-style is almost unheard of. In 2009 Tel Aviv made a first try to protect historic buildings and passed a comprehensive plan on preservation, which was met with ire by the residents. Effecting almost exclusively Bauhaus buildings dating from the 1930s, houses that qualified were required to have strict restorations at the expense of the owner, but with subsidies offered by the city. Following the passage of the law homeowners in Tel Aviv filed a class action citing punitive expenses imposed on owners of older buildings. Perhaps this outpour of legal action influenced the city because in the 2012 regulations on well houses, private residences were exempted.

For the Red House, the loopholes in the policy could either serve as a mandate for preservation or a green light for demolition. The current owner is in the process of selling the house to the city of Tel Aviv, likely ensuring strict renovations. However, the city could easily flip the property to another private owner who could then gut the building of its lingering Palestinian architecture. The original well, decorative wood panels, floors and window glass are still throughout the structure.

IMG 8603
View from roof. (Photo: Red House resident)
IMG 8962
Well and courtyard. (Photo: Red House resident)

But the Red House’s current residents are cynical that preservation will come for their home. A few weeks ago an inspector from the city came to visit the building and when one of the activists living there asked about the future of the house, the city employee scoffed that it would likely become condominiums for Tel Aviv’s elite. The Red House residents also are quick to note, “that’s what they did in Meshina,” another former Palestinian area in Jaffa—after the city bought the buildings, they contend, the municipality sold them to a new set of owners who were free to refurbish the buildings beyond recognition. If the house is demolished or renovated beyond recognition, it would erase yet another piece of Palestine’s history in the nucleolus of Tel Aviv. In light of the current circumstances the best scenario is that the house will remain under the stewardship of the city and will be persevered for another generation at least.

But, as of now, one of the activists lamented, “it’s all rumors.” At this time they do not have an exact eviction date, and the city has not provided insight if preservation or demolition will come next.

 

About Allison Deger

Allison Deger is the Assistant Editor of Mondoweiss.net. Follow her on twitter at @allissoncd.

Other posts by .


Posted In:

18 Responses

  1. justicewillprevail
    April 15, 2013, 11:29 am

    Fascinating, and moving reminder of the history of this area. What a tragedy that Israel will be only too keen to wipe out the memory of the past, substituting their own fantasy version of pre-1940’s Israel. They have done it all over Israel, after all. Maybe when they mature as a country they will understand the horror of what they have done, and restore a genuine history and dignity to the area and its populations. They want Anne Frank’s house preserved, they want innumerable museums and testimonies to the Holocaust, but a simple, dignified acknowledgement of Palestinian history is beyond them.

  2. James Canning
    April 15, 2013, 2:19 pm

    Fascinating piece. Great photos. Surely the Red House is an excellent restoration/historic preservation opportunity.

  3. ryan-o
    April 15, 2013, 3:08 pm

    One photo is largely responsible for Tel Aviv’s founding myth. The photo with a group of people (who we are to assume are Jewish) standing in a large group on a patch of desert with sand dunes in the background. Tel Aviv was Jaffa/Joppa. Expanded to a degree, yes but mostly just the Jewish side of a boundary. I might be thinking of something else, but there might have even been a little (pre-Zionist) town there originally with its own name. One of these days I hope somebody will write an extensive real history book about the whole thing so people can see through the mess of propaganda myths.

    • Mayhem
      April 15, 2013, 7:20 pm

      Another example of revisionist history concocted to push a cause regardless of facts. Here is the photo to which ryan-o referred link to google.com.au
      Tel Aviv had its beginnings in 1909 on empty sand dunes bought from local inhabitants by Jews – that is no myth. The fact that Palestinian Arabs lived there too is also no myth. This story is trying to make something out of nothing.

      • talknic
        April 16, 2013, 5:50 am

        Mayhem

        “This story is trying to make something out of nothing”

        Oh? This yours “The fact that Palestinian Arabs lived there too is also no myth. ” Because this is someone else says”Tel Aviv and Jaffa were the first places built only by Jews when no Arab was around at the very beginning. I remind the readers that Tel Aviv and Jaffa were just sand dunes before the Jews built these places the way they are now! The Arabs in Jaffa came and settled there ONLY AFTER Tel Aviv AND Jaffa were built by the first pioneers during the first aliyah! ” link to olehgirl.com Perhaps you’ll scoot over there and correct them…

        The article is countering the myths propagated by zionist colonialistas

      • seafoid
        April 16, 2013, 10:20 am

        “revisionist history”

        As if zionist history is real.

    • kayq
      April 16, 2013, 12:17 am

      Tel Aviv was originally a small town built in 1909 for the Jewish community. After 1948, it expanded over ethnically cleansed villages and became a big city, becoming connected Jaffa. Hence it being called Tel Aviv-Yafo.
      Yeah, it does bust the myth that Tel Avib was entirely Jewish, well only part of it was, or in fact not only Jewish but part of it was Tel Aviv in general.

  4. DICKERSON3870
    April 15, 2013, 3:34 pm

    RE: “Not an empty sand dune: A Palestinian mansion in downtown Tel Aviv” ~ article by Allison Deger

    MY KUDOS: A superb, beautifully written article!

  5. RJL
    April 15, 2013, 3:35 pm

    As a city, Tel Aviv started in the early 1900s. To be sure, there were individual homes or buildings in the area, including a mosque seen from the southern most part of Tel Aviv beach, before the city began. What else is new? It became an extension of Yaffo, a city of mixed religions. There were homes in Hebron belonging to Jews, well before 1929 and the infamous Hebron massacres against Jews. Ditto in other Palestinian only towns in the West Bank. What’s your point? Thousands of Jews were killed in 1948, a war they didn’t start. I’m sure thousands of Palestinian arabs were killed too, and many formerly arab villages and towns erased. You expect time to stop, only arab claims to be met, and the 6 million Jews of Israel and their histories to be irrelevant? When is MDW and other anti-Israel sites going to accept the reality of a land to either be divided between two peoples, or a very long reconciliation, starting with eliminating obvious anti-Jewish propaganda and the “right” to kick them all out of “their” land, which could one day result in one country serving both peoples equally. At this point in time, it could not work; there would be a horrific bloody civil war. Is that your goal?

    • Stephen Shenfield
      April 16, 2013, 8:02 pm

      RJL: Why should the process of reconciliation START with the Palestinians renouncing the idea of kicking Israeli Jews out of Palestine? This idea is no more than a fantasy that they have no power to realize, while their own dispossession and displacement are a continuing reality in the West Bank, the Jordan valley, the Negev, etc. Isn’t it up to the stronger side, who have the power to kick and use it every day in reality and not in fantasy, to take the first step toward reconciliation, simply by stopping kicking?

      You may think that whoever began the conflict should take the first step to end it. The trouble is that even after all the works of the “new historians” like Morris and Pappe you still believe that it was Arabs who started the conflict. Do you really not know that the forcible dispossession and expulsion (and in some places massacre) of Palestinians began in 1947 several months BEFORE Arab military forces entered Palestine and tried unsuccessfully to halt that dispossession and expulsion?

    • talknic
      April 19, 2013, 2:25 am

      RJL “There were homes in Hebron belonging to Jews, well before 1929″

      ‘real estate’ is not ‘territory’. The legitimate citizens of a ‘territory’ are protected under the ” sacred trust” of UN Charter Chapt XI, regardless of whether they own ‘real estate’, lease or rent ‘real estate’ or live in poverty under a bridge in that ‘territory’.

      The ‘real estate’ owned by Jewish folk and Jewish institutions pales into insignificance compared to the amount of ‘territory’ allotted the State of Israel, completely gratis!

      “Thousands of Jews were killed in 1948, a war they didn’t start”

      Plan Dalet was a ‘Jewish’ plan. Under plan Dalet ‘Jewish’ forces were outside of the territory allotted the ‘Jewish’ state the day it was declared. With ‘Jewish’ forces outside of the ‘Jewish’ state the pre-existing civil war immediately became a war by the ‘Jewish’ state in what remained of Palestine. The Regional Powers had a legal right to intervene on notification to the UNSC of their intentions UN Charter Chapt VII

      There are no UNSC resolutions against any Arab State for the Invasion of “Palestine” link to mfa.gov.il

      “You expect time to stop, only arab claims to be met,”

      The ‘A’rab claims to “Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem” link to domino.un.org have legitimacy under the Laws, UN Charter and conventions Israel AGREED to uphold.

      ” the 6 million Jews of Israel and their histories to be irrelevant?

      Israel’s claims to non-Israeli territory have no legitimacy what so ever. Jewish history in the region and under the Nazis was relegated to history as of May 15th 1948 when Israel was first recognized as “an independent republic within frontiers approved by the General Assembly of the United Nations in its Resolution of November 29, 1947″ as it asked to be recognized. Israel has never legally annexed ANY territory to the recognized sovereign extent of the Jewish homeland state. The right of Jews to settle anywhere in Palestine was dashed by the Zionist Federation’s push to have a Jewish state. Missed opportunity after missed opportunity. link to wp.me

      “When is MDW and other anti-Israel sites going to accept the reality of a land to either be divided between two peoples”

      It was divided May 15th 1948 in the final act of the Jewish People’s Council and the Zionist Movement accepting and enshrining UNGA res 181 in the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel link to mfa.gov.il Israel has been illegally acquiring non-Israeli territory for the past 65 years

      It is now 2013. Israel has had its forces in territory “outside the State of Israel” for 65 years.

      ” starting with eliminating obvious anti-Jewish propaganda”

      Israel needs to first stop LYING to its citizens and start adhering to the law, not that it can now afford to. Repatriating hundreds of thousands of illegal settlers and paying 65 years of reparations would send the Jewish state bankrupt for decades

  6. seafoid
    April 15, 2013, 4:29 pm

    I guess very little of Israeli history is reality based.

  7. asherpat
    April 15, 2013, 7:46 pm

    Radical left groups, black immigrants, tracking of original owners…doesn’t sound like a ruthless apartheid dictatorship to me… Is Alison going native?

    • seafoid
      April 16, 2013, 10:23 am

      Asher

      What happened to all the people who lived there in 1948?
      SA at least kept all the undesirables within its own borders. Israel didn’t.

      And like one anecdote turns Israel into Norway.
      Fail again.

  8. Emma
    April 15, 2013, 10:57 pm

    Beautiful story. Well done. Thank you.

  9. Obsidian
    April 16, 2013, 6:24 am

    What’s the big deal?
    Most of these small Arab villages were legally incorporated into the Tel Aviv Municipality under the British Mandate.

    “By 1943, as a result of the ‘expenditure of great efforts’ by Tel Aviv’s Mayor Israel Rokach, the [Tel Aviv] municipality succeeded in having large parts of Sheikh Muwannis incorporated into it’s town planning area, ‘a great victory for Tel Aviv’, as it was described in the city’s Official Gazette”–Constituting Modernity: Private Property in the East and West, edited by Huri Islamoğlu-Inan, page 121.

    Contrary to Zochrot’s claim, Jammasin al-Gharbi , aka Jerrisheh, wasn’t even an Arab village. The British Western Survey of Palestine(1878) describes Jerrisheh as a ‘mill’, and in 1917, this photograph confirms as much.

    link to img.pars03.fr.topfoto.co.uk

  10. Roberto
    April 18, 2013, 9:16 pm

    I was amazed to see the floor tiles! They look identical to my home city (Merida-Venezuela) traditional floor tiles. I suppose it’s because the Arab influence in Spanish culture, brought into America.

Leave a Reply