Culture

Hotel Rwanda at Cooper Union

This is part of Marc H. Ellis’s “Exile and the Prophetic” feature for Mondoweiss. To read the entire series visit the archive page.

It’s getting scarier, scandalous really, with Netanyahu in town once again.

I remember when progressive Jews were certain that Ariel Sharon would never become Prime Minister.  Why?  Because Israel’s Jewish ethical center would hold.  Then when the Wall was being built those in the know were sure that mainstream Jews and the international community would halt the Wall.  Why?  Because Israel’s injustice had become too obvious.

We’ve come a long way since those days.

Only one person has served longer than Netanyahu as Israel’s prime minister – Israel’s founding father, David Ben-Gurion.  Coming from different political perspectives, Netanyahu and Ben-Gurion make a strange or complementary pair depending on how one understands the history – and future – of Israel.

Netanyahu spends Monday in Washington and Tuesday at the United Nations.  What I am thinking about this morning, though, is the Paul Kagame/Elie Wiesel love fest at Cooper Union tonight.  Amazing stuff when the doyen of Holocaust remembrance links up with the controversial and increasingly criticized Rwandan strongman.

Paul Rusesabagina (Photo via KPFA)
Paul Rusesabagina (Photo via KPFA)

Like Netanyahu, Kagame is here for the United Nations.  The 20th anniversary of the Rwandan genocide has arrived.  As with Ben-Gurion and Netanyahu, Netanyahu, Wiesel and Kagame make strange bedfellows.  At least, I would like to think so, especially when Holocaust and genocide are on the table.  However, increasingly it seems just the opposite.  The three are natural allies in subterfuge and enabling violence.

Who will break this alliance?  Such a break would be good for everyone, including the victims of the Holocaust and the Rwandan genocide.  Hotel Rwanda’s Paul Rusesabagina has posted an open letter challenging Wiesel’s and Kagame’s joint appearance.

Below are excerpts from his letter.  They read as a wake-up call for those who seek to remember both the Jewish and Rwandan experience of mass death:

As a Rwandan genocide survivor, I was very disturbed to hear that the Jewish Values Network is providing a forum for Rwandan President Paul Kagame to polish his image and tell more lies to the international community. My foundation and I were even more surprised to see that Elie Wiesel would agree to serve on a panel with Kagame.

We love Elie Wiesel and his work very much. He is a genocide survivor, a great humanitarian, and a well-deserved Nobel Laureate. That being the case, we simply don’t want to see him sitting next to someone with so much blood on his hands. I have met Mr. Wiesel on a number of occasions, and in November of 2011 I was very pleased to receive the Lantos Human Rights Prize, which Elie Wiesel was awarded in 2010. It was an incredible honor to win an award that he had also received.

But now, a man that the entire world respects has been caught in a fishing net by Kagame’s public relations machine. It would be a terrible shame to see Elie Wiesel sitting at the same panel with someone accused by the international community of having killed hundreds of thousands of people in Rwanda’s neighbor, the Democratic Republic of the Congo. These are innocent civilians killed, the elderly, children and the sick, not just “rebel” soldiers.

Since leading a civil war against the Rwandan government from 1990-1994, a mountain of evidence continues to accumulate that Kagame and his forces have been involved in war crimes and crimes against humanity both in Rwanda during that civil war, and now in the neighboring Congo. In the Congo, the 2010 United Nations Mapping Report even states that there is enough evidence to investigate whether the Rwandan government committed genocide against Hutu civilians there. Atrocities continue on a daily basis, with UN and other international reports making it clear that the Rwandan government supports and controls the M23 militia group that is driving the violence, recruiting child soldiers, killing enormous numbers of civilians, and raping women and children daily in the Kivu region.

                                                      ——————————-

When we first saw the ad for this event, we thought “wow, it’s a bad idea for anyone to debate Elie Wiesel on genocide. I wonder why Kagame would do that?” But then we read deeper, and realized the terrible irony of this panel.

It would be a terrible shame to see Elie Wiesel sitting at the same panel with someone who has so much blood on his hands. And it would be an equal disgrace for highly respected Jewish organizations like the NYU Bronfman Center and the Jewish Values Network to allow Kagame a forum to spread his false tale. My understanding was that your organizations stand for justice and stopping violence. Kagame simply stands for impunity and doing whatever it takes to stay in power.

Paul Kagame is a violent dictator who should be on trial for his actions, not celebrated for them. The idea that he can sit with Elie Wiesel and discuss how to protect the weak should be a very bad joke, but it appears that it is instead a bad and embarrassing mistake about to happen.

Obviously Rusesabagina and Kagame have a thing going between them.  It turns out that Jews aren’t the only ones with a disputed history.

Rusesabagina plea is eloquent – tinged with innocence.  After all, it is Wiesel who is the elder Holocaust statesman, the man who taught the world, including many in Rwanda, how to commemorate mass death.

As a survivor, Rusesabagina has difficulty wrapping his mind around the naiveté of his friend, Elie Wiesel.  But, then, Rusesabagina may need to adjust his view of Wiesel.  Wiesel has been mostly silent on the suffering of Palestinians.  It would surprise everyone if he put gloves on and fought Kagame tonight.

Empowered victims and those who speak for them often take the mantle of suffering and do what they want with it without being brought to account.  Imperial Jewishness has no problem with being unaccountable.  Imperial Jewishness insists on it.  Imperial Rwanda is same.  That’s why some see Rwanda as the Israel of Africa.

The ostensible connection tonight – Holocaust, the Rwandan genocide and the use of chemical weapons in Syria – is the stretch of stretches.  Over the last few weeks, the Russian-American-United Nations negotiations on Syria and President Rouhani’s posture on Iran’s nuclear policy and the Holocaust has changed the highly charged political landscape to a considerable degree.

So the air might be out of the Cooper Union Holocaust/Genocide/Syria tire.  Or will the assembled panel that includes other purveyors of violence like Sheldon Adelson compromise further those who died in the Holocaust and the Rwandan genocide?

57 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Hotel Rwanda is wrong, Wiesel will fit right in…he’s a con man, Jewish supremist and moral hypocrite. The holocaust has probably created more profitable careers and phony moralist than any other event in history.

Wiesel he withdrew from his role as chair of the International Conference on the Holocaust and Genocide, and made efforts to abort the conference, in deference to Israeli objection to the inclusion of sessions on the Armenian genocide.

On April 18, 2010 in The New York Times and on 16 April for three other newspapers, Wiesel wrote a full-page advertisement in which he emphasized the Jewish connection to Jerusalem and criticized the Obama administration for pressuring Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to halt East Jerusalem Israeli settlement construction. He said that: “For me, the Jew that I am, Jerusalem is above politics. It is mentioned more than six hundred times in Scripture — and not a single time in the Koran.”

http://www.thenation.com/article/wiesel-words

Wiesel Words
by Christopher Hitchens

Is there a more contemptible poseur and windbag than Elie Wiesel? I suppose there may be. But not, surely, a poseur and windbag who receives (and takes as his due) such grotesque deference on moral questions.

Christopher Hitchens
February 1, 2001
Is there a more contemptible poseur and windbag than Elie Wiesel? I suppose there may be. But not, surely, a poseur and windbag who receives (and takes as his due) such grotesque deference on moral questions. Look, if you will, at his essay on Jerusalem in the New York Times of January 24.
“”As a Jew living in the United States, I have long denied myself the right to intervene in Israel’s internal debates…. My critics have their conception of social and individual ethics; I have mine. But while I grant them their right to criticize, they sometimes deny mine to abstain.

Such magnificent condescension, to grant his critics the right. And it is not certain from when Wiesel dates his high-minded abstention from Israel’s internal affairs; he was a member of Menachem Begin’s Irgun in the 1940s, when that force employed extreme violence against Arab civilians and was more than ready to use it against Jews…….”

Many men who lack character and values “wrap themselves in the flag.” People like Wiesel wrap themselves in The Holocaust ™. People who wrap themselves in deceptive costumes seem to enjoy relaxing in the company of others who do the same — and to dislike having to answer to people who wrap themselves in straightforward costumes, people who are themselves, who wear their values on their sleeves and act accordingly.

“Never Again” ™ means “we win, now and forever”. for some Rwandans, the lesson is the same, it appears.

>> But now, a man that the entire world respects has been caught in a fishing net by Kagame’s public relations machine.

Mr. Wiesel is self-serving, a Zio-supremacist and a hypocrite. I don’t respect him.

Rusesabagina, Kagame, Wiesel are all milking the situation and each other. They are all in the same notorious league.

RE: “My foundation and I were even more surprised to see that Elie Wiesel would agree to serve on a panel with Kagame.” ~ Rusesabagina

MY COMMENT: I certainly wasn’t! ! ! *

* FROM ELIE WIESEL (letter published in the Washington Post back in April of 2010):

[EXCERPTS] . . . For me, the Jew that I am, Jerusalem is above politics. . .
. . . It is important to remember: had Jordan not Joined Egypt and Syria in the 1967 war against Israel, the old city of Jerusalem would still be Arab.
Clearly, while Jews were ready to die for Jerusalem they would not kill for Jerusalem.
Today, for the first time in history Jews, Christlans and Muslims all may freely worship at their shrines. And, contrary to certain media reports, Jews, Christians and Muslims ARE allowed to build their homes anywhere In city. . .

SOURCE – http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_elie_wiesel_ad.html

* ALSO SEE: An open letter to Elie Wiesel from activists from the Sheikh Jarrah movement in response to the letter Wiesel published in the Washington Posthttps://mondoweiss.mystagingwebsite.com/2010/04/wiesel-should-stop-offering-celestial-prescriptions-for-a-city-he-doesnt-live-in.html

* AND SEE: “Can Jewish Liberals Transcend the Wiesel Doctrine? Countering the Israel Lobby’s Dominance”, by Alan Nasser, Counterpunch, 5/29/12

“We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Sometimes we must interfere. When human lives are endangered, when human dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivitiess become irrelevant.” ~ Elie Wiesel, From the “Kingdom of Memory: Reminiscences”
“My loyalty to my people, to our people, and to Israel comes first and prevents me from saying anything critical of Israel outside Israel… As a Jew I see my role as a melitz yosher, a defender of Israel: I defend even her mistakes… I must identify with whatever Israel does – even with her errors.” ~ Elie Wiesel, “Against Silence”

In the end, whether Israel’s penchant for serial atrocities encounters an effective obstacle will hinge on two types of resistance, elicited not from the fictitious “international community”, but from the active opponents of Israel’s ongoing projects, and from the withdrawal of moral and financial support for the ongoing reproduction of Israel as an apartheid Zionist State.
Among the first type of response are the increasingly visible efforts, which gained momentum in the wake of the May 2010 flotilla murders, to promote sanctions, boycott and divestiture. . .
. . . The second kind of response includes refusals to any longer make excuses for Israeli abominations, willingness finally to speak out in public protest, and the cessation of financial support for the rogue State. An especially powerful development would be the readiness of American Jews to announce loud and clear that Israel does not speak for them, to distance themselves from the agenda of the politically powerful Israel lobby, and to cross over into solidarity with the Palestinian people. None of this, I will suggest below, is as far-fetched as it might have seemed fifteen years ago.
Among the key habits of thought, feeling and action that must be defeated is what we might call the Wiesel Doctrine, as expressed in the second passage at the head of this article, which pledges to “defend even [Israel’s] mistakes… [to] identify with whatever Israel does – even with her errors.” The Doctrine saturates the political consciousness of too many older (an important qualifier) liberal American Jews. These are the Jews most likely to contribute to AIPAC and for whom their perception of a given Senate, House or presidential candidate’s friendliness to Israeli policy is sufficient to determine support.
. . . As Beinart observes, “As secular Jews drift away from America’s Zionist institutions, their orthodox counterparts will likely step into the breach.” Thus, the distance between largely secular American Jews and the Zionist establishment is likely to widen. But this will weaken the political power of the Israel lobby – inextricably linked, of course, to the Jewish establishment – only if American Jews as a whole are prepared to announce unambiguously their antipathy to their… representatives. The political and moral responsibility this places on American Jewish liberals cannot be overestimated. . .
. . . [Peter] Bienart sees that as an American Jew he bears a special responsibility to act on the words, hypocritically penned by Elie Wiesel, cited at the head of this article: “We must always take sides…. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Sometimes we must interfere.” I say he’s right.

ENTIRE COMMENTARY – http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/05/29/countering-the-israel-lobbys-dominance/