News

Zionism versus democracy–the new/old conversation

Yesterday's Jerusalem Post ran an important piece by Samuel Freedman on the likely end of the two-state solution and calls for democracy in Israel/Palestine. Last week at the 92d Street Y, another American Jewish journalist, Michelle Goldberg, said the same thing: now's our last chance to save the Jewish state, because Zionism isn't looking democratic.
Last year Bernard Avishai published a book, The Hebrew Republic, in which he quoted Israeli P.M. Ehud Olmert saying the same thing, more than two years ago (history gets impatient), at a breakfast at his house. Avishai then takes up the great realistic/democratic chore that follows from this understanding: how to lead Israeli Jews and American Jews toward imagining acceptance of a democratic basis for coexistence in Israel/Palestine.

[Olmert said,] “I know that the main challenge to the basis of what Israel is all about is the argument of Azmi Bishara [leader of the Israeli Arab Balad party], who demands a country for all of its citizens. Then, if the Arabs become a majority, It’ll be a different country from what it is. If the majority of Israelis will not be Jewish, then Israel will not be Jewish. You can’t help it because democracy will be stronger. That’s why we have to hurry up separation from the territories—we’ll miss the time.”

Isn’t the real issue whether one sees the identity of the nation as a blood tie, something a Jew can claim the moment the plane touches down, or whether one has to go through a process of acculturation, the acquisition of the language, the way every other European country does it, the way Canada does it?… After her husband left, I confessed to Aliza Olmert that I feared we might not have fifty years. In any case, I said, Yehuda Amichai’s poetry, not the law of Return, embodies the Zionist project for me. She looked at me softly. “Hebrew is my homeland,” she said.

9 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments