News

AIPAC sells ‘intoxicating’ donors’ conclave with endless wine (and Brazile, Begala and Fleischer)

AIPAC announces its next “National Summit in California wine country,” this coming October. Video features countless images of grapes and wine-glasses and “great wine”– red being poured with sloppy gusto at :40– and promises of “intoxicating” conversation about the U.S. and Israel. I noticed lib Dems Donna Brazile, who can say nothing bad about Israel, and Paul Begala; no wonder I see them on MSNBC. And Iraq war promoter Ari Fleischer. Two day summit is for those who contribute an annual minimum of $3600, and costs $195

Says MJ Rosenberg: “Theme seems to be getting drunk on power and California wine. So the kids do Birthright to have sex, and their parents do AIPAC  to drink.”

45 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Perhaps they can all dress up a la Hikind @- his Purim party and make Halloween really special this year.

“an intellectual booster shot”– highly doubtful.

Why don’t they introduce some “Wine of Israel” [front label], back label “Golan Heights Winery, POB 183, Katzrin, 12900, ISRAEL. All produced [according to UNSC Resolution 497] in Syria, [Country code SY] on stolen land, with stolen water and produced by illegal settlers on illegal settlements [Geneva 49.6] and sold to the world with false labeling see European Union Regulation No 491/2009 and EU Regulation No 607/2009 Article 55, which states “Country of origin” mandatory.

Donna Brazille a huge such up. And let us not ever forget Fleisher’s role in outing CIA undercover agent Valerie Plame who had put her own life on the line for this country. That outing undermined US national Security and the report about the lives lost and financial cost to the US will never be released. But no doubt that Fleisher and so many others in the Bush administration should have been put on trial for purposely outing Plame

Just to add to the above According to the World Trade Organization and the European Union rules of origin which are consistent with our own Trade Descriptions Act 1968 section 36, which states COUNTRY OF ORIGIN.. [1] For the purposes of this act, goods shall be deemed to have been manufactured or produced in the country in which they last underwent a treatment or process resulting in a substantial change. This clearly puts this imported product in breach of section 16 Trade Descriptions act 1968, PROHIBITION OF IMPORTATION OF GOODS BEARING FALSE INDICATION OF ORIGIN, ” Where a false trade description is applied to any goods outside the UK and the false indication, or one of the false indications, given, or likely to be taken as given, thereby is an indication of the place of manufacture, production, processing or reconditioning of the goods or any part thereof, the goods shall not be imported into the United Kingdom”.

No surprises here – viewing the video directly on YT, ratings and comments have been disabled:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_K9J7jqiL4&feature=player_embedded

AIPAC’s whole schtick is lipstick on a pig, and they know it, and everyone else does too…