News

SF officials describe ‘apartheid’ label as ‘intolerance alienating the Jewish community’

Scott Wiener
Scott Wiener

Things are escalating here in the Bay Area over American Muslims for Palestine’s (AMP) “End Apartheid Now” Muni bus ads. Seven out of twelve members of San Francisco’s board of supervisors have stepped into the fray, requesting San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA) to donate proceeds from the ad to  the city’s Human Rights Commission to “be used to fight growing intolerance alienating the Jewish community.” Yes you heard that right.

Supervisor Scott Wiener, above, calls AMP’s money “dirty money,” and he says there is a precedent for the donation, spelled out in The San Francisco Chronicle. “Wiener upset over MTA accepting anti-Israel ad money:”

When advertisements went up on Muni buses implying that Muslims are “savages,” the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency donated the revenue from the ad campaign to the Human Rights Commission. Now several supervisors are asking why the same isn’t being done for ads calling Israel an “apartheid” state.

In other words, they see no difference between suggesting that Muslims are savages and calling Israel an apartheid state. Pro-Israel bloggers are enthused.

AMP has issued a press release. Along with the other members of its coalition, Jewish Voice for Peace, the Council on American Islamic Relations, the Asian Law Caucus and the National Lawyers Guild, they are urging San Francisco authorities to uphold open debate.

The coalition calls on the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency to “resist pressure to donate ad proceeds to the Human Rights Commission, which would officially equate the political ads with hate speech.”

ad(SAN FRANCISCO 05/24/2013) – Civil rights organizations call upon San Francisco authorities to resist pressure to stigmatize Muni bus ads that quote Nobel Peace Prize laureate Archbishop Desmond Tutu characterizing Israeli policies as apartheid. The coalition, including Jewish Voice for Peace, the Council on American Islamic Relations, the Asian Law Caucus and the National Lawyers Guild, urges San Francisco authorities to uphold open debate on one of the most important human rights issues of our time.

The ads, which first appeared on Muni buses on May 7, were placed by the education and advocacy organization American Muslims for Palestine. They feature political speech that critiques Israeli policy and US foreign aid to Israel. The ads make no denigrating statements about Jewish people or Judaism, nor do they reference that community at all. But in response, the Jewish Community Relations Council, the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee – institutions with long histories of attempting to stifle open and honest debate about Israeli policies – have unleashed a relentless smear campaign to mislabel political critique as hate speech. They conflate AMP’s political message with hate-filled racist and Islamophobic ads placed by Pamela Geller and her American Freedom Defense Initiative, which call Palestinians and Muslims ‘savages,’ and denigrate an entire religion and its adherents.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has classified the Freedom Defense Initiative as a hate group.

“Critique of Israel’s race-based system of governance is not hate, it is core political speech. It is critical to the free marketplace of ideas to resist the pressure to demonize political speech and equate it with anti-Jewish or hate-filled speech,” said Dr. Hatem Bazian, AMP chairman and Berkeley professor.

The coalition is urging the Municipal Transportation Authority and San Francisco supervisors to resist pressure to donate ad proceeds to the Human Rights Commission, which would officially equate the political ads with hate speech. The coalition also urges authorities to resist pressure to shut down its vehicles as a public forum for political speech altogether.

“Many Israeli authorities and other notable figures such as former President Jimmy Carter have used the legal term apartheid to characterize Israeli state policies,” said Carol Sanders of Jewish Voice for Peace. “San Francisco has long been a city where diverse opinions, political speech, and freedom of expression have been valued and protected. It should stay that way.”

The transportation authority may consider a letter sponsored by Supervisor Scott Wiener and signed by six other supervisors calling for condemnation of AMP’s ad at its next meeting. The coalition of human rights and social justice activists is urging SFMTA to uphold the First Amendment guarantee of free speech and refrain from equating political speech with hate speech. To do otherwise would be a disservice to the people of the San Francisco Bay area, where open debate about the great issues of our time and diversity of political opinion are so highly valued.

50 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“dirty money”???

The sheer hubris is breathtaking and puke- worthy. Annie, I have to go for a bit of a walk before I start cursing and ‘screaming’ on this wonderful, educational and humanistic site.

The Jews it is alienating are the Jews promoting apartheid and colonization.

This is identity politics. White racists (whether they be KKK, White nationalists, or the Afrikaaners) just need a good Lobby like Zionist Jews.

Then they can be as racist as they want and re-brand their racism as ‘self-defense’ and ‘returning to their homeland’ (whilst kicking everyone else out of theirs).

Israeli Arab Judge, Salim Jubran, has been appointed to the head of Israel Central Election committee- Apartheid my a…
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/Flash.aspx/242410#.UZ_9iWTF2fs

too damn bad that some Jews feel alienated by ads calling Israel an apartheid state. sorry, but the label just happens to fit. if they’re so upset they should do something about it – Israel’s apartheid, that is. on the other hand the ad that suggests all Muslims are savages, hey, this is despicable stereotyping to the Nth degree and deserves condemnation.

‘intolerance alienating the Jewish community’

1. who is this Jewish community ?

2 Israel is effectively engaging in a national system of abuse of Palestinians. It is fascinating to see intolerance raised as an issue in the US to defend abuse in Israel. The centre won’t be able to hold on this defence, I’m afraid.

I would hate to have the bots speaking for me.