Trending Topics:

Dissecting ‘The Jewish Voices on Campus’: a predictable but necessary endeavor

on 27 Comments

The YouTube video “The Jewish Voices on Campus,” posted in early October, has had nearly 148,000 viewings, and has achieved notoriety in the post-Protective Edge and post-Salaita hasbara echo chamber. I was therefore perversely curious enough to explore the claims made in the video. Certainly most Mondoweiss readers will not be surprised by either the video or my findings; nevertheless, a dissection of the video merits exposure, both for the threadbare credibility of its charges and the blatancy of its deceptions, as well as implications for efforts at truth-telling.

The 5+ minute video was produced by Aaron Goldenberg based on what is apparently a national conference of the Jewish fraternity, Alpha Epsilon Pi, early this past Fall. A longer 9+ minute and less-viewed video simply called “The Jewish Voices” includes, for good measure, an introductory section featuring David Horowitz that is unrelated to the conference. I will delineate the segments of the latter, longer video below.

I was led to these videos while exploring the claims made in a guest commentary in my local newspaper, the News-Gazette (Urbana-Champaign), which has been instrumental in demonizing Steven Salaita. The author, Miriam Fendius Elman of Syracuse University writes:

“Over 40 percent of Jewish-American college students report that they’ve experienced harassment or intimidation, or are aware of anti-Semitism at their schools. And Cary Nelson, the former president of the AAUP from 2006-2012 who defended his university’s decision not to hire Salaita, observes that it’s becoming harder to find an academic space grounded in empathy for both Palestinians and Israelis.”

The 40% figure apparently comes from a 2011 report called “Alone on the Quad” by the Institute for Jewish and Community Research. While the title of the report’s initial section states “More than 2 in 5 Jewish students confirm anti-semitism on their campuses,” the accompanying chart reports “Percent of students who perceive anti-semitism on campus.” For Jews, the figure reported is 43%; for non-Jews, 11%. The report claims to have surveyed 1,400 students nationally; however, no further methodology or results are provided, and even the questions asked are omitted from the report.

In any event, it’s clear that this campaign to assert the existence of pervasive anti-semitism on campus includes efforts by IJCR, AMCHA, and other usual suspects such as the Legal Insurrection and Truth Revolt websites that are encountered as one explores the links accompanying AMCHA’s “Student Voices” listing, and as one explores the allegations made in “The Jewish Voices,” see below.

The longer video is story-boarded into 30 segments, averaging 19 seconds each. Needless to say but still necessary to say, little or no effort is made to explore, question, elaborate, or verify any of the claims made, their relation to pro-Palestinian students or BDS (the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement), or how these allegations might add up to the introductory assertion that “more and more Jewish students are targeted on college campuses with higher intensity and greater malice.”Bringing the Debate to You

The definition of innuendo is: “An allusive or oblique remark or hint, typically a suggestive or disparaging one.” That would serve to summarize the tactics utilized by Aaron Goldenberg and his enablers.

    1. 0:00 – Prelude: David Horowitz is speaking at the University of California San Diego in 2010. It is implied that this Muslim student wants to see Jews in-gathered in Israel so they can be destroyed. A more complicated story regarding this young woman and what transpired is presented by San Diego Channel 7.
    2. 0:20   Introduction: Beyond the assertion noted above, it is claimed that Jewish students are in the “cross-hairs” of BDS, SJP (Students for Justice in Palestine), and “other radical organizations.” There is brief video footage from Montreal, followed by the first of five repetitions in the video of a tussle over a flag that features a bald man in a black T-shirt, the location and real-life context of which is never specified. During this introduction and throughout the video, supporters of Palestine are presented as angry, shouting, screaming, intimidating, and incipiently violent. The narrator of the video is female; all of the Jewish voices are male.
    3. 0:50   In the conference meeting room, self-introduction of 10 members.
    4. 1:08   Brief assertions by students from UC Berkeley and Harvard regarding anti-semitism and the fashionable nature of “being against Israel” on campus, followed by footage of demonstrators with keffiyehs used as masks, implying threat and danger.
    5. 1:22   A Kent State student refers to a controversial professor. The article the student reads from is from 2011, with no mention of “little jihadists” or “terrorist watch list” as the student asserts.
    6. 1:43   A Florida State student refers to students “screaming ‘intifada,’” followed by stomping on an Israeli flag, which was “gruesome.” For the second time we see footage of a tussle over an Israeli flag and the black T-shirt; it’s implied but not confirmed that this footage is from FSU.
    7. 1:55   A Loyola University Chicago student describes the protest of a Birthright table that was “brutal.” Footage is shown of people in Palestinian/Arabic garb, including a child; it’s not believable that this footage corresponds to the campus event described. An alternative perspective on events at Loyola was posted on Mondoweiss.
    8. 2:07   In a relatively long segment, a student from UC Santa Cruz alleges feelings of fear and threat during the debates over the divestment resolution last May. Incipient violence is implied, but no evidence is offered. In a web search, no evidence can be found. The footage shown is clearly not on the UCSC campus. A Google search located “Marina’s Bar and Grill” (seen in the background, 2:25) in Miami, although I have no confirmation that this is where this footage was shot. As Mondoweiss coverage noted, Professor Tammi Ross-Benjamin runs the AMCHA initiative at UCSC (she also contributed to Cary Nelson’s edited volume in opposition to an academic boycott).
    9. 2:40   Interlude: The narrator asserts that “Jewish students have become targets of radical organizations with agendas filled with hate.” Jewish students are compared to “Palestinians (strangely depicted as imprisoned in a shopping cart) suffering at the hands of Hamas.” This introduces the notion, stated clearly in the conclusion of the video, that its narrative perspective is “pro-Palestine, pro-Israel, pro-peace” (thus adopting the rhetorical tactic of “The Third Narrative” by Cary Nelson, et al.).
      An image of the map of Israel as a bloody knife marked “Made in Israel” and captioned by “Boycott Divest Sanction” is shown. However intended, it’s a rather confusing image. In addition, the narrator accuses the BDS movement of supporting “violence, bigotry, and anti-semitism on college campuses.” The concluding photo of a mock checkpoint can be found with this article by Tammi Ross-Benjamin, and was taken at UCLA. Apparently, in spite of the intimidating environment at UCSC, she couldn’t find a photo better than this, which of course illustrates a very different perspective.
    10. 3:00   A University of Oregon student refers to swastikas drawn on the fraternity’s mail boxes, and an accompanying photo is shown; no evidence is offered regarding either the perpetrators or the involvement of pro-Palestinian individuals. Several such incidents have indeed occurred around the country, but there has yet to be confirmed a connection to the pro-Palestine or BDS movement. The Oregon student also refers to the “anti-semitic Student Body President.” No elaboration is offered.
    11. 3:10 A University of Cincinnati student refers to the anti-semitic political campaign of Robert Ransdell of Kentucky; this campaign clearly had nothing to do with BDS. This comment competes for the most blatant and obvious deception in the video.
    12. 3:25   Interlude: Footage of a demonstrator with a red cap raising his middle finger, innocent Jewish fraternity brothers at the conference, a screaming woman of Arabic background, and chanting and marching demonstrators.
    13. 3:35   A UC Berkeley student refers to the long hours of apparently non-violent if contentious (but ultimately praiseworthy in terms of political participation) student government debate over a BDS resolution. However, he chooses to emphasize that the following day a friend of his who voted “no” to BDS was allegedly chastised by two students from another campus.
    14. 4:00 A University of Vermont student reports a second-hand allegation that an “anti-Israel” rally over the summer was “more anti-semitism than anti-Israel.”
    15. 4:07  In the longest segment of the video, which also competes for the most transparently deceptive, a University of Arizona fraternity brother describes an assault on his house by another fraternity, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, that clearly has nothing whatsoever to do with Palestine or BDS, although it may have something to do with an old-fashioned variety of anti-semitism.
    16. 5:04 A University of Calgary student gives a selective description of recent events in that city. Coverage in chronological order can be found here, here, here, and here, including reference to a pro-Israel as well as pro-Palestinian rally. While the student claims that the pro-Palestine rally was organized by a group on campus, it’s clear from the accompanying footage and news coverage that it occurred off campus. Nevertheless, the student states that he “fears for (his) life” while on campus. Please note the apology of the local, esteemed woman of Arabic background.
    17. 5:50   The Loyola University of Chicago student, referred to above in relation to the Birthright table, points out that SJP “became very active in the last year.” His words are accompanied, for the third time in this video, by footage of the tussle over an Israeli flag and the appearance of the man in the black T-shirt. The student alleges that an Orthodox friend is afraid to wear a kippah on campus.
    18. 6:14 The UC Berkeley student referred to above relates a story about an Israeli student who claimed at a meeting that she is both “pro-Palestinian and pro-Israeli” being “booed out of (Arabic) class” the next day.
    19. 6:25   A University of Maryland-Baltimore County student refers to “hate rhetoric about ‘free free Palestine, go back to Israel you f’ing Jews.’” His words are accompanied by footage depicting one nondescript woman pushing another woman at a rally, and of the same man with the red cap who displayed his middle finger in a previous segment, but he is restraining himself in this excerpt.
    20. 6:37   The UC Berkeley student claims that one of his fraternity brothers gets called a “kike” for wearing his kippah, and that it “happens from even within the Greek system.” Again, good old-fashioned anti-semitism?
    21. 6:50 Interlude: The narrator refers to the “aggression of one group” influencing “how we can learn on campus;” “these crimes target Jewish students in an environment meant for open discussion.” A photo of a mock apartheid wall at UC Irvine with a tattered Israeli flag is shown. Once again, for the fourth time, the footage of the melee over the Israeli flag and the man in the black T-shirt is included.
    22. 7:08   A Ryerson University (Toronto) student claims that his fraternity is not recognized on campus because it is Jewish.
    23. 7:13    A James Madison University student says that the President of the university will not respond to requests by Jewish students for a menorah on campus and for an “official” Holocaust remembrance occasion through the school. He also refers to swastika graffiti on mail boxes and a stolen flag. James Madison University has a Hillel; it’s not clear what campus policy is regarding religious displays.
    24. 7:42 Interlude: Narrator: “To block open thinking and limit the knowledge we have access to is to take away the fundamental purpose of a higher education.” The man with the red cap who was previously depicted shouting while displaying his middle finger is now displayed pointing his index finger.
    25. 7:50   A student from the Claremont Colleges (Southern California) asserts that many professors there have called for an academic boycott of Israel.
    26. 8:00 The UC Berkeley student claims that anti-semitism is “institutionalized” and “every day.” Footage is shown of an apparently pro-Palestinian die-in.
    27. 8:15   A University of Southern California student (introduced earlier in the video) asserts that his campus is “poisoned by anti-semitism but also … a dark level of hatred.”
    28. 8:20   The UC Berkeley student states that the environment on campus makes students “very uncomfortable,” but “thank goodness there are people willing to speak out about it.”
    29. 8:30   A UC Santa Barbara student claims that during the BDS debates, a woman “was spit on (walking across campus) by another student simply because he saw that she was wearing a Jewish star around her neck.”
    30. 8:40 Conclusion: For the fifth and final time, footage of the man in the black T-shirt with an Israeli flag is included, along with footage of a burning Israeli flag at a demonstration. Narrator: “These times target Jewish students in an environment meant for open discussion and education.” Words are graphically displayed: Jewish in blue, hatred in red. Male voice: “Anti-semitism, hatred of the Jewish people, of Israel, is real, and I can only hope that in the future we’ll be able to get through it together.”
      Narrator: “The message of hate, bred on the tongues of terrorists (in red), now poison our college campuses today; and it’s up to us, the Jews (blue), the Christians (yellow), the Muslims (green), to stand up for peace (blue, like Israel); it’s up to us, the students in pursuit of the freedom of education, to push back and stop these radical (yellow), hate-driven (red) organizations. Stop violence (red), stop bigotry (green, like Muslims), stop anti-semitism (red-blue). Pro-Palestine, pro-Israel, pro-peace (all white).”

It’s one thing to see the baseless and absurd nature of this propaganda; but it’s quite another thing to consider the possibly frightening level of the pervasiveness of the cultural/political mentality that would take such nonsense seriously, among either Jews or non-Jews. It’s the latter consideration that should concern activists both on and off campus in relation to their efforts to introduce relatively open minds to realities both here and there.

David Green
About David Green

David Green, 67, lives in Champaign, Illinois, and is of Jewish background. Since 1998 he has been involved in the Palestinian justice movement on campus and in the community. He has published articles relevant to this movement on Mondoweiss, Counterpunch, ZNet, Electronic Intifada, and Palestine Chronicle websites, as well as dozens of letters in the local newspaper, the News-Gazette.

Other posts by .

Posted In:

27 Responses

  1. Xpat
    December 29, 2014, 11:29 am

    David – Thank you for doing this work and exposing this stuff for what it is. I am filing away for use when people refer to anti-semitism on campus as a given.

  2. Atlantaiconoclast
    December 29, 2014, 1:44 pm

    Can someone once and for all, offer a coherent and consistent definition of “anti-Semitism? Does it mean that any claim that might be associated with a stereotype is anti Jewish, even if the claim is true? IMO, the word, “anti Semitism.” should be reserved ONLY for when someone implies that someone is bad just for being Jewish, or that they are assumed to be guilty of some deed, again, just because that person is Jewish. Should bad Jews get a pass, simply because many of the old stereotypes about Jews are unfairly applied by actual bigots to the many good Jews? Is it anti Semitic to call out Jewish supremacism or supremacists, just because many Jews are NOT supremacists? Is it anti Semitic to point out anti-Gentile statements in the Talmud, as one would point out anti Jewish statements among Christians throughout history? I am really trying to understand this as a non-Jew who tries to see every one as an individual first. The anti Semite label seems often to be more of a shield or a deflection tool for certain bad people who just happen to be Jewish, than a true description.

    • Real Jew
      Real Jew
      December 30, 2014, 8:41 pm

      The definition of antisemitism is irrelevant to these people who are constantly smearing others with this label. Basically anything that portrays israel in a negative light is deemed antisemetic by this crowd. They are constantly trying to change the definition until it becomes all encompassing. Merely criticizing israeli policy will earn you the title of antisemites and this is exactly what they want. Just another tactic to shut down discourse. Its utterly despicable the way tbey abuse this word in order to justify and support their own racist ideology.

  3. kma
    December 29, 2014, 2:06 pm

    wow, awesome work. It should be easy to film anti-muslim violence and actually make a real case for why they should be afraid on campuses. (And it is true that women aren’t safe…)
    Here’s some (only SOME) of the real racism that goes on where I live:

    in any case, flag-burning is legal protest, and back in 2002/2003 when hundreds of thousands of us protested the invasion of Iraq, there were a handful of counter-demonstrators with American and Israeli flags. One of them was trying to get us to carry his Israeli flag along with our Palestinian flags. Needless to say, some of those flags got burned in the street! I’m sure that would make good footage for the anti-semitism videos, but they’d have to make sure the footage doesn’t catch any of the Jewish organizations who were out there protesting the war.

  4. tree
    December 29, 2014, 3:03 pm

    A Google search located “Marina’s Bar and Grill” (seen in the background, 2:25) in Miami, although I have no confirmation that this is where this footage was shot.

    David, I did a Google Map search of 340 Biscayne Blvd, Miami (the address of Marina’s Bar and Grill in Miami). The street view matches the video, complete with green awning with “Marina’s Bar and Grill” printed on it in the same type. I think that confirms it was filmed in Miami, and NOT in Santa Cruz, as implied by the video.

    • tree
      December 29, 2014, 3:22 pm

      Further research on the video. I think I found where it was shot and when. Marina’s Bar and Grill is a restaurant within Holiday Inn-Port of Miami located at the same address on Biscayne Blvd. I did a quick search of “Demonstration outside of Holiday Inn” and came up empty. However, I played a hunch and looked up the address of the Israeli Consulate in Miami. It is located at 100 Biscayne Blvd. I then looked up “Israeli consulate miami demonstration” and got this hit:

      posted by a pro-Israeli person.

      If you look in the background (clearest at :17) you can see the “Holiday Inn” sign across the street with 2nd floor awning of red. If you look carefully below at street level you can see the green awnings visible at 2:25 in the Jewish Voices on Campus video.

      The protest occurred on July 20, 2014 near the Israeli Consulate in Miami, in response to Israel’s bombardment and invasion of Gaza. It did not occur on campus, and other than shouting insults and slogans back and forth across the street there was no violence between the protesters and counter-protesters.

      • David Green
        David Green
        December 29, 2014, 3:27 pm

        Thanks for substantiating my doubts.

      • CigarGod
        December 30, 2014, 9:33 am

        Man alive!
        You are a good, tree.

  5. gracie fr
    gracie fr
    December 29, 2014, 4:30 pm

    Less than a year after a small number of pro-Israel groups attempted to convince state legislatures and Congress to pass legislation punishing academic associations who took political positions critical of Israel’s human-rights abuses of the Palestinian people, many of the same groups are once again conspiring to deprive those deemed insignificantly deferential to Israel of academic freedom.

    While last year’s target was mainly the American Studies Association, who along with the Asian American Studies Association and the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association endorsed boycotting Israeli state institutions complicit in human-rights abuses, including the abridgement of Palestinian academic freedom, some pro-Israel groups have now set their sights on a familiar target—Middle Eastern studies departments. A coalition of groups led by the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law and the AMCHA Initiative are leading a campaign to end federal funding for college Middle Eastern studies programs unless they adopt means to oversee and police the alleged ideological content of those programs.

    • JustJessetr
      December 30, 2014, 11:07 pm

      Wow! That’s pretty smart of the Brandies Center!

      • annie
        December 31, 2014, 12:47 am

        it will backfire.

      • JustJessetr
        December 31, 2014, 11:19 am

        @Annie. And at Woodstock, they yelled, “No rain! No rain! No rain!”.

      • Mooser
        January 1, 2015, 4:00 pm

        “And at Woodstock, they yelled, “No rain! No rain! No rain!”.

        Yup, it may be 2015, but that doesn’t stop “JustJessetr” from pulling out his old hippie-punching material.

      • MRW
        January 2, 2015, 2:09 am

        it will backfire.

        Not only that, produce a spoken-out-loud criticism of these outsiders’ attempt to put university curricula under a legal gun. The NYT wrote a scathing op-ed about the NYPD and their over-reaching. Substitute the NYPD in this graf for “Aaron Goldenberg and his enablers.”

        But none of those grievances can justify the snarling sense of victimhood that seems to be motivating the anti-de Blasio campaign — the belief that the department is never wrong, that it never needs redirection or reform, only reverence. This is the view peddled by union officials like Patrick Lynch, the president of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association — that cops are an ethically impeccable force with their own priorities and codes of behavior, accountable only to themselves, and whose reflexive defiance in the face of valid criticism is somehow normal.

        Would the NYT editorial board be this clear-headed about fanatical Israel supporters.

  6. a blah chick
    a blah chick
    December 29, 2014, 9:34 pm

    It’s in my nature to be sympathetic but it’s really hard because all I see are a bunch of privileged white kids who don’t like having their politics questioned by the lower classes.

    James Meredith and the Little Rock teens endured real campus intimidation with grace and dignity while this group whines about some people in keffayehs yelling at them. Give me a friggin’ break.

    • Mooser
      December 30, 2014, 2:33 pm

      “James Meredith and the Little Rock teens endured real campus intimidation with grace and dignity”

      And well within living and media memory, too.

  7. W.Jones
    December 29, 2014, 10:31 pm

    “I would never say this in print, but I think [Judith] Butler is a lunatic.” – Cary Nelson, Salaita’s critic at UIUC

  8. Reds
    December 30, 2014, 12:18 am

    Isn’t david horowitz listed as being part of a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center(SPLC)?

    • OyVey00
      December 30, 2014, 2:16 pm

      The SPLC itself is a hate group.

      • Mooser
        December 31, 2014, 4:17 pm

        “The SPLC itself is a hate group.”

        I guess the MENSA people must be after you all the time, huh? “The SPLC is itself a hate group”? Gee, where have I heard that before, or did you come to this remarkable conclusion all by yourself “OyVey00”?

  9. Kathleen
    December 30, 2014, 12:25 pm

    Would really like to hear what all of the blocked out students are claiming? Went to the original. Nothing.

  10. Kathleen
    December 30, 2014, 12:43 pm

    Signs of “with Jews we lose” sure looks like anti Jewish/Semitism. Also that young man’s story at 4:12 sure sounds damn anti Jewish/Semitic. Agree does not sound like it was associated with the BDS movement etc but sure sounds like it should have been reported. Evidence of that attack?

    Why are so many other testimonies blocked out? Cannot find all testimonies available on you tube either

    • David Green
      David Green
      December 30, 2014, 2:04 pm

      Kathleen, the Arizona incident has a back story, but I don’t really care. What I care to argue is that none of these alleged incidents passes the laugh test in terms of anti-Semitic intent of students/faculty on campus; on this basis, none of them passes the laugh test in terms of Jewish students “targeted” by supporters of BDS. There are multiple levels of absurdity involved here.

  11. Kathleen
    December 30, 2014, 12:55 pm

    There has always been a clear and serious problem with being able to differentiate between real anti Jewish/Semitic language due to so many people who have been and continue to be willing to call much needed and accurate criticism of Israel’s crimes against humanity (Palestinians) and real anti Jewish stances.

    If any of these claims by students (4:12) being harassed, knocked out, spit on because they are Jewish are accurate they should be reported and validated. Consequences for witnessed violent actions and words.

    • David Green
      David Green
      December 30, 2014, 2:15 pm

      If this propaganda effort reflects what is called anti-Semitism, then it’s pretty clear that anything that can be fairly called anti-Semitism no longer expresses itself in any concrete and substantial way on college campuses. Given the last 40 years of political/cultural history in this country, that’s not the least bit surprising.

      • a blah chick
        a blah chick
        December 30, 2014, 7:11 pm

        What’s really pissy is that real anti-Jewish acts will not get the attention they deserve because the Zionist orgs are too busy trying to shut down criticism of Israel.

  12. n
    January 27, 2015, 3:13 pm

    Making fun of supposed campus anti-Semitism in the Stanford satirical magazine:

Leave a Reply