Trending Topics:

Copenhagen mayor awards BDS activists for their courage

Activism
on 8 Comments

At a time when Boycotts, Divestments and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel are being punished by Israel-apologists, an award for the courage of these activists from the Copenhagen Municipality comes as a fresh wind.

The award was presented to BDS activists Ronnie Barkan, Majed Abusalama and Stavit Sinai (known as “Humboldt 3”) by Copenhagen’s Mayor for Technical and Environmental Affairs, Ninna Hedeager Olsen, at a ceremony in Copenhagen’s City Hall Thursday. It stated that 

Mr. Barkan and his colleagues have worked tirelessly to reveal the Apartheid-like nature of the Israeli regime and its systematic violation of international law. By doing so, the Copenhagen Courageous laureates have sown the seeds for a peaceful settlement between Israelis and Palestinians based on truth and justice.

(Full statement here).

I was fortunate to be there, witness the event, interview the three afterwards (interview here), and participate in a talk of the three with Danish Member of Parliament Christian Juhl.

The three are currently facing trial in Berlin (first hearing set for March 4), for disrupting a talk by Israeli centrist lawmaker Aliza Lavie at Humboldt University in Berlin. They have described it on this site:

On June 20th 2017, we, three human-rights activists, engaged an act of political protest, which was directed at an official Israeli state representative, Member of Knesset Aliza Lavie (Yesh Atid political party). The aim of action was twofold: first, to protest Lavie’s “Hasbara” event, which was hosted by Humboldt University, and second, to raise public awareness to Israel’s criminal responsibility in perpetuating an apartheid regime. MK Lavie herself is personally accountable for her role as a coalition member during the 2014 onslaught on the besieged Gaza Strip, where over 2,200 people have been killed, including 89 entire families that were obliterated. Furthermore, the protesters began by emphasizing that Lavie appears in Humboldt University as a representative of a criminal apartheid state. Given that under international law the Crime of Apartheid is classified as a crime against humanity, we, as people of conscience, were morally obligated to perform our civil responsibility and speak up against those very horrendous crimes that were, and still are, being carried out in our name.

Aliza Lavie is furthermore a prominent member of the anti-BDS lobby, which sees itself as fighting the “delegitimization” of Israel. From her Knesset page:

Lavie also focuses on hasbara (efforts to improve Israel’s image abroad) and fighting the delegitimization of Israel, strengthening the status of the IDF…

Lavie’s party, Yesh Atid (‘There’s a Future’) is headed by Yair Lapid, who is contending for Prime Minister, and has made the fight against BDS a central goal. In 2015 he conducted a propaganda campaign at the Ben Gurion airport, himself handing out anti-BDS booklets to prepare Israelis for the “war” that they are supposed to fight abroad against BDS. The pamphlets claimed:

We are at war. The BDS movement for boycott divestment and sanctions is circulating an inconceivable amount of lies about us, fabricated photos and concocted testimonies. The goal – slandering Israel in the world, isolating us, causing us to turn into a hated and illegitimate state. 

It is important to note just how difficult it is to speak out plainly against Israeli policies in Germany, as these three have done. The “special relationship” between Israel and Germany apparently also means coordinated press slander campaigns. Thus, the Jerusalem Post parroted the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the German-Israel Society, smearing the three as “Hezbollah terrorists”.

So the three are being prosecuted by the State of Berlin, for speaking out against Israeli crimes.

The two charges are trespassing and assault, following a complaint by the organizers: Deutsche Israelische Gesellschaft (German Israel Society) and Humboldt University. Both claims are ironic: the event was open (so how could they trespass?), and no assault victim is mentioned. Actually, the only physical assault that took place was against Stavit Sinai – who was dragged out by a leading member of the German Israel Society and then punched in the face by another member. This was not the first time Sinai was attacked for protesting Israeli leaders. In 2015, when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu engaged in Holocaust revisionism, trying to ascribe the idea for the Final Solution to the Palestinian Grand Mufti, Sinai took part in a demonstration in front of the Chancellery in Berlin and was hospitalized due to police brutality. The group she was part of held placards reading “Netanyahu is a Holocaust denier.”

As Sinai notes in a recent piece in Electronic Intifada:

The assassination of our characters belongs to a wider pattern whereby consent is manufactured on shielding Israel from criticism. Yet the smearing of dissidents is nothing but a distraction from truths that can no longer be concealed: the crime of apartheid that Israel has practiced in a barbaric and systematic way for decades and how Germany has been complicit in that crime. 

The three are in fact courageously performing a civil, moral duty. As Professors Richard Falk and Virginia Tilley emphasized at the very end of the groundbreaking UN-commissioned report on Israeli Apartheid (p. 56):

Efforts should be made to broaden support for boycott, divestment and sanctions initiatives among civil society actors… Private sector actors should be made aware of the findings of this report and requested to act accordingly, including by informing the public about the criminality of the apartheid regime, and urging Governments to fulfil their obligations under the Apartheid Convention and to propose initiatives that could be undertaken by civil society. Private sector actors should also be reminded of their legal, moral and political responsibility to sever ties with commercial ventures and projects that directly or indirectly aid and abet the apartheid regime imposed.

Richard Falk spoke at an event in honor of the three in Berlin (last November) and said:

It seems to me important to present yourselves as actually engaged in German patriotism in a certain way. That you’re liberating Germany from its own dark past, because that’s what it really is. It really comes down to the understanding that if you want to get rid of antisemitism, you’ve got to begin to take criminality seriously wherever it occurs, and you can’t choose your criminals because of your history.

Ronnie Barkan, Majed Abusalama and Stavit Sinai with Richard Falk at event last November 2018. From Facebook.

There was laughter in the audience when Falk said they were helping to liberate Germany. It’s a novel idea, it points to the notion that Germany is captive to what is actively promoted by Israel as Holocaust guilt. Three years ago, in an off-the-record comment to journalists, Israeli Berlin embassy spokeswoman Adi Farjon said that Israel had no interest in full normalization of relations with Germany, and that it was an Israeli interest to maintain German guilt feelings, because without them, Israel would be “just another country as far as they’re concerned.” And Germany has basically been following the Israeli lead in this “special”, yet abusive, “relationship”, in which it accepts the line that Israel, with its Zionist policies, is the right answer to anti-Semitism. Yet in doing so, Germany has helped perpetuate another crime, this time against Palestinians, and is thus unable to extricate itself from its guilt.

Although the three are being tried criminally, they are ideologically turning the tables and calling their court-date, “Taking Israel to Court in Berlin”. They want to raise lots of awareness by asking people to come and witness (at the Moabit Criminal Court). “While the German prosecution is interested in criminalizing their dissenting voices, the three will be taking on the State of Israel in front of the German courts.” Because the case is a political attempt on behalf of Israel, to paint the activists as criminals, so as to divert attention from the criminality that they themselves have courageously pointed to.

Living in Denmark as I do, witnessing this honoring of such activists, I have to say that it plants hope and warmth, and a certain pride. The real shame is about how USA tramples its Constitution’s 1st Amendment in order to defend Israeli crimes; or how Germany shuts down any condemnation of Israel as an Apartheid state because of Holocaust guilt. So much is stacked against these activists, and that’s just an extension of all that is stacked against Palestinians and their rights these days, and for well over 70 years.

So this is a liberation. Also for Denmark. I know, it’s not perfect. Here too there is censorship of Palestinian voices, like when the Danish Jewish Community hosted a pro-Israel event by a right-wing nationalist group last month, and a respected Palestinian leader was denied entry to the open event because he might, God forbid, ask a critical question. With that background, it becomes even more meaningful that an award like this is given. Because in the end, as Nelson Mandela explained: “we know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.”  

About Jonathan Ofir

Israeli musician, conductor and blogger / writer based in Denmark.

Other posts by .


Posted In:

8 Responses

  1. Kay24
    Kay24
    February 9, 2019, 6:32 pm

    The bold gesture at this time, as the article says, when trying to boycott Israel is met with punishment, especially in the US. Israel’s efforts in demonizing those who are protesting their occupation, and land grabs, peacefully, should be rejected. Israel deserves to be boycotted and sanctioned, in fact it was long overdue. If this was Iran we would have shocked and awed them, and toppled their government by now.

  2. wdr
    wdr
    February 9, 2019, 8:35 pm

    Ninna Olsen is not the “Mayor of Copenhagen.” A man named Frank Jensen is. She is a member
    of the far, far left Red-Green Alliance, and is the chairman of one particular municipal committee in Copenhagen, for which she is bizarrely called the “Mayor” of this committee, not its “Chairman,” and is as much a mayor as is the Mayor of Toytown.

    • oldgeezer
      oldgeezer
      February 9, 2019, 9:28 pm

      @wdr

      Why bizarrely?

      Jensen is not the mayor.

      His title is Lord Mayor.

      All of the major committee heads carry the title of Mayor.

      What is truly bizarre is your complete arrogance and contempt for other people who are free to set up structures, etc without your approval or consent. Oh wait…. no that’s not bizarre for a zionist either.

      btw… Mayor did not originate in the English language.

    • gamal
      gamal
      February 9, 2019, 9:31 pm

      “Mayor of Copenhagen” does not appear does it, it says

      ” Copenhagen’s Mayor for Technical and Environmental Affairs, Ninna Hedeager Olsen, at a ceremony in Copenhagen’s City Hall Thursday”

      “she is bizarrely called the “Mayor” of this committee”

      cheeky monkey.

    • Keith
      Keith
      February 10, 2019, 12:19 am

      WDR- “She is a member of the far, far left Red-Green Alliance….”

      In today’s world of far right neoliberalism, anyone labeled as “…a member of the far, far left Red-Green Alliance….” is someone in touch with reality. Probably someone Zionists hate for the obvious reasons.

      • annie
        annie
        February 10, 2019, 2:32 am

        In today’s world of far right neoliberalism

        don’t you mean ‘In today’s world of far far right neoliberalism’?

      • Keith
        Keith
        February 10, 2019, 12:03 pm

        ANNIE- “don’t you mean ‘In today’s world of far far right neoliberalism’?”

        Point taken.

      • Misterioso
        Misterioso
        February 11, 2019, 10:20 am

        @Keith, et al

        Also:
        https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/02/netherlands-recognise-gaza-strip-west-bank-birthplaces-190210181854139.html

        “Netherlands to recognise Gaza Strip and West Bank as birthplaces””Netherlands will allow those born after May 15, 1948 to use occupied Palestinian territories as official place of birth”

        Al Jazeera, Feb. 10/19

        “The Dutch government has announced it will start to recognise the Gaza Strip and the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, as official birthplaces for Palestinians who were born in the country after the establishment of Israel.

        “While the Netherlands does not yet recognise the State of Palestine, it will recognise those Palestinian territories as the origin of birth for those born after May 15, 1948 when the British Mandate officially ended.

        “The announcement was made by Dutch State Secretary Raymond Knops at The Hague.
        “According to an Interior Ministry release published on Saturday, Knops said the Gaza Strip and occupied West Bank would be added to the list of territories that the Dutch civil registry accepts.

        ‘No sovereignty’
        “According to the statement, Knops noted the new category is in accordance with ‘the Dutch viewpoint that Israel has no sovereignty over these areas,’ as well as the Netherlands’ refusal to recognise Palestine as a state.

        “He said the new category reflects the terms agreed upon in the Oslo Peace Accords signed between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organisation in the 1990s and in subsequent United Nations Security Council resolutions.

        “The only options previously available to Palestinians in the Netherlands were ‘Israel’ and ‘unknown’ – the latter added as an option in 2014 because Palestinians had protested against putting Israel as their place of birth.

        “According to Dutch news agency Nos, the decision came after a Dutch man of Palestinian origin sued the Netherlands before the European Court of Human Rights, demanding his right to register as Palestinian-born, instead of as an Israeli.

        “At least 136 countries and the UN General Assembly have recognised Palestine as a sovereign state, but most of the European Union has refrained from doing so until one is declared in the framework of a peace agreement with Israel.”

Leave a Reply