You have heard the news that the talks to revive the Iran deal are apparently on life support in Vienna. The United States claims Iran has moved the goalposts. And though the State Department team remains positive, our dear friend Israel has been demanding that the U.S. break off the talks.
The Israelis get unrivaled access to the White House even as they declare once again that they are drawing up plans to attack Iran– but it would be good if the U.S. went first with some strategic strikes. The U.S. has reportedly restrained Israel on attacking Iran for the umpteenth time.
It’s an old story. Donald Trump now confesses that he was used by Israel, when he ordered the killing of an Iranian general in 2020– a blatant war crime.
And Trump told Axios’s Barak Ravid that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was “willing to fight Iran to the last American soldier.”
That ought to be big news. But though our press acknowledges that Israel is the only country that really objects to the Iran deal (as was the case in 2015 when Obama made the historic deal and defied Israel), what is not openly discussed, except in the leftwing press, is that Israel is “trying to pressure Washington into an aggressive posture toward Iran that could spiral into war.” So another huge disaster looms in the Middle East, due to Israel’s need to avoid dealing with the Palestinian/apartheid issue and shift the focus to supposed “existential” threats.
A country with “dozens” of nuclear weapons itself wants Iran sequestered from the world ala Gaza– and it has the ear of the Biden administration, as no one else does. The Israeli defense minister who is trying to shut down Palestinian human rights organizations (and whose scheme of bombing Gaza “back to the stone age” is under investigation from the International Criminal Court) gets a meeting with our defense secretary and secretary of state without any mention of his tyrannical actions.
Here’s a roundup of some of the leftwing coverage. Branko Marcetic writes at Jacobin about Israel’s attempts to manipulate U.S. policy. The article is headlined, “Israel Is Trying to Push War With Iran — and the US Press Barely Cares.”
Look it up and you’ll find next to no coverage in the US media about top Israeli officials visiting Washington this week to push for military strikes against Iran, raising the risk of sparking war. Yet that’s exactly what happened.
Israeli lobbyists “persuaded” Trump to break the deal in 2018. If Russia were meddling in our foreign policy like this, it would be an outrage.
[T]he relative US media silence on news that Israeli officials are trying to pressure Washington into an aggressive posture toward Iran that could spiral into war stands in stark contrast to the press’s ongoing obsession with the Kremlin’s attempts at intervening in US politics. That particular effort yielded no policy concessions to Russia over the four years Trump was president, in contrast to Israel’s political meddling in the United States, which continues to be more pervasive, normalized, and successful than that of arguably any other foreign government. Yet that’s not considered scandalous by the establishment press, even if it could be leading us into war.
Marcetic helpfully notes that “Israel… is known to have at least dozens of nukes and has long rejected any regional antinuclear agreement.”
Medea Benjamin and Ariel Gold make a similar point at Jacobin: “Israel is Hell-Bent on sabotaging U.S. nuclear negotiations with Iran… Israel is doing everything it can to… stoke a war.”
Reflecting on the abject failures and destruction wrecked by the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, a war with Iran would be catastrophic. One would think that Israel, which receives $3.8 billion annually from the United States, would feel obligated not to drag the United States and their own people into such a disaster. But that doesn’t seem to be the case.
Trita Parsi writes at Responsible Statecraft that just allowing Israel in the room gives a seat at the table to a country that is working against the U.S. interest. “Biden’s efforts to appease Bennett on Iran have failed on all fronts,” Parsi writes.
In December 2020, Obama’s deputy national security adviser, Ben Rhodes publicly implored Biden not to repeat this mistake: “I plead with [Biden],” he said on the PodSaveAmerica podcast. “Do not think there is any ounce of good faith that will be coming your way from Bibi Netanyahu, from MBS, and from the Tom Cottons of this world. These people have no interest in a deal. They’ve never had an interest in a deal,” he declared. “How many times do we have to go through this play? This is in the hands of the Biden people to say: ‘We don’t need to listen to these people.’”
But Biden chose to listen to them. Instead of returning to the JCPOA in the first days and weeks of his administration, critical time and effort were spent trying to persuade Israel, Saudi Arabia and the UAE to get onboard with diplomacy. ..
Yes and why do we listen to them? Why can’t we just tell them to go away? Why do even progressive congresspeople go on trips to meet Israeli officials, sponsored by the Israel lobby? Because the lobby is a major force inside the Democratic Party; and Biden is afraid to take it on as Obama did.
Parsi focuses on a New York Times report that shows that Biden has been seeking to appease Israel from the start in his outreach to Iran.
This line in the Times’ piece nails the folly of Biden’s efforts: “Despite the tougher American talk, Israeli officials left worried that the diplomatic outreach to Iran would continue.” Indeed, Israel’s greatest worry is that diplomacy succeeds, not that it fails…
Biden is merely continuing Trump’s policies, Parsi writes. He concludes by calling on the U.S. to pursue the American interest, not Israel’s.
The moral of the story is this: U.S. and Israeli interests on Iran diplomacy are irreconcilable. Biden’s efforts to square the circle have predictably failed. Biden must choose whether he will pursue America’s interest or Israel. This should not be a difficult choice.
That New York Times report offers helpful coverage of the facts. It shows Biden bending over backwards for Israel: the president has adopted a “tougher line… aimed at calming increasingly frustrated Israeli officials.”
Reporters Julian Barnes, David Sanger, and Ronen Bergman say the U.S. has been to try to present a “united front” with Israel re Iran– by threatening war:
In an effort to close the gap, American officials let out word this week that two months ago, Mr. Biden asked his national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, to review the Pentagon’s revised plan to take military action if the diplomatic effort collapsed. Administration officials also outlined new efforts to tighten, rather than loosen, sanctions on Iran…
The U.S. has resisted Israel efforts to “sabotage” Iranian nuclear facilities, saying, We can do better through peaceful means. But that’s not good enough.
Israeli officials have not been reassured. They are increasingly concerned that the United States will eventually reach a deal with Tehran and then seek to block Israeli intelligence services from carrying out covert sabotage attacks. Israeli leaders say they want a guarantee from the Biden administration that Washington will not seek to restrain their sabotage campaign, even if a renewed nuclear deal is reached.
And now the Times is reporting on a renewed Israeli effort to try to coerce American terms on the Iran deal by threatening “repeated bombings” of Iran, a tried-and-true Israeli tactic.
Again, why is Israel able to give the U.S. ultimatums, face to face? Why is a small crazed country that is armed with nukes able to push hawkish policies in the U.S.? Because of domestic politics. But the Democratic/progressive/Jewish soulsearching never begins.
h/t Dave Reed, Adam Horowitz, James North, Donald Johnson, Scott Roth.
If you compare the two nations, it seems Israel is the one that has nuclear weapons, has attacked many of its neighbors, and is constantly causing trouble everywhere in the world. Iran has been demonized by Israel and the US, and their “do as I say not as I do” stance is ironic. Israel has been agitating about Iran getting nuclear powers for years, and its ex PM has been leading the doomsday scenarios, scaring the world about Iran bombing the planet within months, with cartoon bomb and props, and that was years ago.
Israel used its (Adelson bought) control over Trump to get the US Embassy moved to Jerusalem, to sign off on the Golan Heights (still not recognized by the international community), and of course to destroy Obama’s Iran nuclear agreement. The US is at fault here, but still is trying to call the shots, and making demands from a country that kept to their side of the bargain, but was still punished with the nuclear agreement torn up, and the harshest sanctions imposed.
Like all other nations, Iran should do what is best for them, and it is time the US did the right thing, told Israel to go jump in the lake, and re-signed that deal. It is time Israel understood that other nations had a right to nuclear power, and that it cannot be the only rich kid with the shiny toys in the neighborhood.
It is ironic that Israel keeps pointing out that Iran cannot be trusted with nuclear powers, when the fact is neither can Israel, who is notorious for using deadly weapons on unarmed civilians.
Just to be clear, I’m not carrying water for Iran. But let’s pretend that they’re actually human beings and have some kind of internally coherent set of reasons as to why they might want a bomb. This Vox article from 2015 has, I think, a pretty accurate viewpoint –
https://www.vox.com/2015/2/25/8101383/iran-nuclear-reasons
“The real reasons Iran is so committed to its nuclear program…”
The article gives several reasons which seem plausible to me. As Thomas Friedman has pointed out, whatever other qualities Iran’s leaders have, suicidal impulses are not among them, they don’t actually want to use the bomb against another nuclear state.
“Despite widespread misconceptions to the contrary in the US — often pushed by politicians who wish to play up the Iranian threat for political gain — there is no reason to believe that Iran wants to launch an offensive nuclear strike against the US, Israel, or any other country.”
Why does the mainstream press act like a monopoly that is owned by Israel? As Deep Throat recommended to Woodward and Bernstein, “Follow the money”. There seems to be something appropriate to investigate here. What are Woodward and Bernstein doing these days?
Iran need to have 60% refinement to make the mini power-plants the remote villages need. Long transmission lines through empty places would be it by Israeli terrorists. They can also supply boat engines for the Chinese super container ships that will be stopping everywhere by at a NATO ot Israeli port.
How does it feel to shoot yourself in both feet at once?
In the event of an attack on Iran by Israel or the US, that is the same hour Russia joins in by attacking Brussels and the area. You guys are aware of that option being on the table, Right?
What a melange of sense and nonsense. Tough to know precisely what the US interest is regarding Iran, so raising questions of US interest versus Israel’s interest is apt. On the other hand: This idea that the possession of nukes by Israel makes Iranian potential nukes harmless is a bunch of malarkey. Anyone with any sense knows that Mutually Assured Destruction is MAD and for Israel a wish to avoid a nuclear Iran makes a hell of a lot of sense and condemning Israel as crazy on other issues, does not make Israel crazy on this issue. The current imams might be sane, but Khomeini might have heirs that are not quite sane and who would gamble on the sanity of end of day imams, who are willing to sacrifice tens of millions to rid the holy land of the infidels, if they didn’t need to. It is logical for Israel to pressure the world to stop an Iranian bomb and to pretend that it’s merely to avoid dealing with the Palestinians, some sort of distraction is absolute nonsense. One can say that Rabin’s peace initiative was an attempt to solve Palestine so that he could get the world on his side vis a vis Iran, which makes this distraction assertion total bull. As I said, what a combo of sense and bullcrap.