News

‘Apartheid’ chorus grows — 60 percent of Middle East scholars reach that conclusion

In a poll conducted by the University of Maryland in March, 60% of Middle East scholars said the the current situation in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza is a one-state reality akin to Apartheid.

The number of experts who characterize Israeli rule over Palestinians as apartheid keeps growing. And several organizations have set up databases to document the trend. “Who’s calling it apartheid?” is Independent Jewish Voices of Canada’s list. Here is a database from the New England Network for Justice for Palestine. Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East has a database too.

As for the latest to say, It’s apartheid– a new survey of Middle East scholars says 60 percent use that word for the Israeli regime in the occupied territories. While 65 percent of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza say it’s apartheid, per the latest poll.

The University of Maryland conducted its Middle East Scholars Barometer survey in late March (nearly 600 anonymous responses from a list of 1729 people in professional organizations, nearly 4/5 Americans):

In your opinion, which of the following comes closest to describing the current reality in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza:

a) The state of Israel with temporary occupation of the West Bank and Gaza 2%

b) The state of Israel with semi-permanent occupation of the West Bank and Gaza 27%

c) Two unequal states 1%

d) A one-state reality with inequality, but not akin to Apartheid 10%

e) A one-state reality akin to Apartheid 60%

Here is the polling of Palestinians saying it’s apartheid, according to the lead Palestinian polling organization:

Two-thirds of the public (65%) approve and 27% disapprove of the assessment that Israel is an apartheid state. Moreover, 48% agree and 40% disagree that Amnesty International’s report on Israel’s racism is an indication of a shift in Western public opinion in favor of Palestinians and against Israel, as it has previously did regarding apartheid in South Africa. 

Palestinians are surely reflecting the attitudes in the Democratic party. In 2021, nearly 3/4 of Democrats wanted the U.S. to take neither side, but twice as many wanted it to take the Palestinian side as wanted it to take Israel’s side (17.9 to 9.5%) according to the University of Maryland.

The Middle East Scholars do not largely see Israel proper as an apartheid regime. Only 29 percent say it is such, while 61 percent describe it as a “democratic state with deep structural inequality.” (9 percent see just some inequality.)

And few of the scholars have faith in a two-state solution. A two-state solution “is no longer possible,” say 61 percent, while 36 percent say it’s “possible, but improbable within the next 10 years.”

And when asked what the most likely outcome is in the next 10 years, if a two-state outcome is no longer possible, more than 3/4 of the scholars say, a “one-state reality akin to Apartheid.”

It’s interesting how this reflects Palestinian attitudes. According to the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research poll:

Support for the concept of the two-state solution stands at 40% and opposition stands at 58%.

It’s not like Palestinians support a one-state solution either — 32 in favor, 63 against.

But the Palestinians don’t think a two-solution is possible and a plurality support armed struggle as a response to the occupation.

A majority of 60% believes that the two-state solution is no longer practical or feasible due to the expansion of Israeli settlements while 36% believe that the solution remains practical. Moreover, 68% believe that the chances for the creation of a Palestinian state alongside the state of Israel in the next five years are slim or nonexistent…

When asked about the most effective means of ending the Israeli occupation and building an independent state, the public split into three groups: 44% chose armed struggle, 25% negotiations, and 24% popular resistance. Three months ago, 42% chose armed struggle and 31% chose negotiations.

Again, these attitudes are reflected among Middle East scholars. Asked to assess the prospect of certain outcomes in Israel/Palestine in the next 5 years– 78 percent saw “a new Palestinian Intifada, perhaps including violent confrontations,” as very or somewhat likely. While 72 percent regard “Israeli expulsion of some/many Palestinians” as very or somewhat likely.

There’s also contempt for Biden’s Middle East policies, as compared to Trump’s.

How would you describe Biden’s overall Middle East policy compared to the previous administration?
a) Much better 12%
b) Somewhat better 44

c) Not significantly changed 39..

Only 7 percent had a favorable view of Biden’s policy in “advancing Israeli Palestinian peace,” while 68 percent were favorable to his Iran nuclear deal policy. As to the Yemen conflict, again Biden did poorly. 16 percent regard his policy as favorable, 48 percent unfavorable…

16 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The US, UK, and the EU, that normally get their information, and advice, from international agencies, like HRW and Amnesty International, and are now ignoring hundreds of pages of reports, and investigations, by these very same Human Rights Agencies, and rejecting their conclusions. If in doubt they can always verify and confirm, from a human rights agency within Israel, who should know better, BT’selem. History will show one day, these nations being complicit in Israel’s crimes, the occupation, land theft, illegal settlements, and unfortunately the consistent killing of unarmed civilians, and entire families being wiped out deliberately. History will also show how they protected the criminal nation at the UN, sent them billions of dollars, and weapons that are used against these unarmed civilians. Unfortunately it will be too late for the Palestinian people.

The calls for these countries to do the right thing, are getting louder. If only these nations showed their concern, and acted in a democratic way, to support and protect a people who have lived for decades under a brutal occupation, when a more powerful entity wage wars, at the slightest pretext which usually end up with more civilian casualties, every time they “mowed the lawn”.
Concern just like we are seeing now for the Ukrainians.

The time to show concern for the Palestinians was decades ago, and giving them their freedom and basis rights are long, long overdue.

Israel is an apartheid nation – Rev. Desmond Tutu said so a long time ago, and years later his words have been supported by many human rights organizations, after months of investigations and research.
What the hell are these Western nations waiting for? For Israel’s approval to act on it?

1 of 2‘Apartheid’ chorus grows — 60 percent of Middle East scholars reach that conclusion.
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20200918-knesset-rejects-bill-to-ensure-full-equality-between-all-israeli-citizens/
“Knesset rejects bill to ensure full equality between all Israeli citizens” Middle East Monitor, Sept. 18/20

In its 2015 Country Report on Human Rights Practices for Israel & the occupied Palestinian territories, issued in 2016,the U.S. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights & Labor acknowledges the “institutional & societal discrimination against Arab citizens of Israel.” (U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights & Labor)

https://www.palestinechronicle.com/former-israeli-attorney-general-my-country-is-now-an-apartheid-regime/
The Palestine Chronicle, Feb/12 2022
Former Israeli Attorney-General: “‘My country is Now an Apartheid Regime’”
“Michael Ben-Yair, a former Israeli Attorney General, has called on the international community to take meaningful steps to end Israel’s apartheid rule in occupied Palestine, in an op-ed published by Ireland’s The Journal magazine on Thursday.

“While Israeli Arabs constitute 20 percent of the population, Arab communities’ jurisdictions occupy just 2.5 percent of the state’s land area, & the process of approving new construction in Arab towns takes decades.” (Haaretz Editorial, April 4, 2017)

Ronnie Kasrils, a key player in the struggle against the former South African apartheid regime, minister for intelligence & a devout Jew: “The Palestinian minority in Israel has for decades been denied basic equality in health, education, housing & land possession, solely because it is not Jewish. The fact that this minority is allowed to vote hardly redresses the rampant injustice in all other basic human rights. They are excluded from the very definition of the ‘Jewish state’, & have virtually no influence on the laws, or political, social & economic policies. Hence, their similarity to the black South Africans ” (Guardian, 25 May/05) – cont’d.

2 of 2
Shlomo Gazit, retired IDF Major General: “[Israel’s] legal system that enforces the law in a discriminatory way on the basis of national identity, is actually maintaining an apartheid regime.” (Haaretz, July 19, 2011)

VIDEO – Jewish-American activist Maya Edery on her journey away from Zionism – YouTube
“Jewish-American activist Maya Edery on her journey away from Zionism” July 7/21
“Our education was so entrenched in believing that you should support Israel & that being Jewish meant loving & supporting Israel that I didn’t know there was another way to be Jewish.” Jewish-American activist, Maya Edery, from Jewish Voice for Peace, speaks to MEE about changing her perspective on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Peter Beinart: Why I no longer believe in a Jewish state – YouTube
VIDEO: “American political commentator, Peter Beinart, speaks to MEE about why he no longer believes in a Jewish state.” (June 23/21)

A regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea: This is apartheid | B’Tselem
https://www.btselem.org/publications/fulltext/202101_this_is_apartheid
B’Tselem, Jan. 12/2021
“A regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea: This is apartheid”
“More than 14 million people, roughly half of them Jews & the other half Palestinians, live between the Jordan River & the Mediterranean Sea under a single rule. The common perception in public, political, legal & media discourse is that two separate regimes operate side by side in this area, separated by the Green Line. One regime, inside the borders of the sovereign State of Israel, is a permanent democracy with a population of about nine million, all Israeli citizens. The other regime, in the territories Israel took over in 1967, whose final status is supposed to be determined in future negotiations, is a military occupation imposed on some five million Palestinian subjects.”

Ilan Pappe, then professor of political science at Haifa University: “[Israel’s] political system is exclusionary, a pro forma democracy – going through the motions of democratic rule but essentially being akin to apartheid or Herenvolk (‘master race’) democracy.” (“Jerusalem Report,” Feb. 14/2000)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=0CIuz_-89Xs
“Israel Palestine International Law Symposium: Is Israel an Apartheid State?”
Sept. 24/18

It took awhile for the “authorities” to accept that the earth was not the center of the universe.