News

New White House press secretary attacked over AIPAC criticism

Incoming White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre is facing criticism over a 2019 op-ed where she wrote, "You cannot call yourself a progressive while continuing to associate yourself with an organization like AIPAC."

Incoming White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre is facing criticism over a 2019 op-ed where she criticized the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Jean-Pierre is first Black and openly LGBTQ person to hold the position.

The article, which ran in Newsweek, praised the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates for skipping AIPAC’s annual conference. “AIPAC is not progressive,” wrote Jean-Pierre. “You cannot call yourself a progressive while continuing to associate yourself with an organization like AIPAC that has often been the antithesis of what it means to be progressive.”

“Unfortunately, AIPAC’s policy and conference speaker choices aren’t its only problems. Its severely racist, Islamophobic rhetoric has proven just as alarming,” it continues. “The organization has become known for trafficking in anti-Muslim and anti-Arab rhetoric while lifting up Islamophobic voices and attitudes.”

Jean-Pierre was a senior advisor and national spokesperson for MoveOn when she wrote the piece. The liberal advocacy group has consistently called on Democrats to skip AIPAC events.

Former U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman denounced the hiring on Twitter. “Amidst all the celebration of Biden’s new press secretary checking multiple boxes in identity politics, the mainstream media forgot to mention that she hates Israel,” he wrote.

Zionist Organization of America national president Mort Klein also released a statement. “As a child of Holocaust survivors and as an American Jew, I am appalled and frightened that Biden has chosen Ms. Jean-Pierre, who has shown essentially anti-Semitic hostility towards Israel and is willing to lie about and vilify Israel and Jews to promote her Israelophobic [sic] agenda,” it reads. “Americans should be deeply concerned that this outrageous, incomprehensible anti-Israel, pro-terrorist and pro-Iran appointment indicates the dangerous direction the Biden administration is going to take against America’s greatest ally Israel and US-Israel relations.”

AIPAC has faced increasing criticism from Democrats in recent months. The pro-Israel lobbying group’s newly-launched Super PAC has endorsed candidates from both sides of the aisle this midterm season, but 109 of them are congressional Republicans who tried to block President Biden’s presidential victory in 2020. “AIPAC’s support for these candidates undermines the true interests and values of millions of American Jews and pro-Israel Americans who AIPAC often claims to represent,” said the liberal Zionist group J Street in a statement, “Elected officials who threaten the very future of our country should be completely beyond the pale – whatever their views on Israel.”

Last month the Progressive Caucus of the North Carolina Democratic Party rescinded its endorsement of House candidate Valerie Foushee over the fact that Foushee had received AIPAC campaign contributions. “No American candidate should be accepting funds from an organization that provides financial support for those seeking to destroy our democracy,” said the group.

AIPAC’s Super PAC has already spent over $1 million in Democratic races this election cycle, but none of their ads actually mention Israel. Recent polling shows that support for the country is declining among Democratic voters.

2 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

She will soon be whipped into shape, warned, and “gently” threatened, and she will definitely comply with the demands of the whiners, and drama queens, who act so outraged. Isn’t this the way it goes in the nation of “free speech” when it comes to Israel?

Which is worse? A White House Spokesperson who once warned about AIPAC (and she was right), or an US Ambassador who was sent to represent this country, despite regularly arguing for Israeli settlements in HIS writings and statements, volunteering to lead an organization that was against a 2 state solution (against US policies), and made sure the US embassy was finally moved to Jerusalem? Is that okay with AIPAC? Of course.

So is Karine Jean-Pierre not “zionist” enough for AIPAC? Americans beware – anything you have said, or criticized any person or group that works in the interests of Israel first, can bring the wrath of the zionists in America, and they are willing to ignore our Constitution, and attack American citizens that have dared to ONCE criticize their representative American organizations here. They will clutch their pearls and accuse you of being anti-semitic, even say they are “frightened”. Really? What will Ms.Jeane-Pierre do from the podium, invite Iranians and terrorists, to attack Israel?
Sounds ridiculous.

Here’s the thing – criticizing an AMERICAN organization that does the bidding of another nation, is NOT anti-semitism. The definition of “Anti-semitism” has taken a strange twist from what it originally meant, and it has been deliberately taken to ridiculous lengths, all to take away our Constitutional rights to free speech, and our Members of Congress and all Presidents, let them!!!

Likely, AIPAC and supporters will lose this round and the more they object the greater their loss.

IMO, in order for Palestinians to seriously gain from the loss of support for Israel, they will need a program that seems plausible to average America. Hope I’m wrong as this logic doesn’t seem to have traction. Rock throwing seems to.