News

The Biden administration refused to admit that the West Bank is occupied. The next day it refused to admit that Israel has nuclear weapons.

Last week the State Department refused to admit that Israel is occupying the West Bank or that the country has nuclear weapons.

As a result of the recent violence in the region, Israel and Palestine were consistent topics during last week’s State Department briefings.

On January 26 Al Quds’ Said Arikat asked State Department spokesperson Vedant Patel if the Biden administration considered Palestinians living in the West Bank to be occupied. Patel would not give a straight answer:

Said Arikat of Al Quds newspaper: What is the status of the Palestinian people in the West Bank, including Jenin… and everywhere else in the West Bank? It’s a simple question. Are they under occupation?

Patel: Said, let me say a couple of things to the point that I believe —

Arikat: Vedant, are they occupied or are they not occupied? What is the status that you give the Palestinians right at this moment? What kind of status do they have?

Patel: Said, the recent period has seen a sharp and —

Arikat: I’m not talking about a recent period. I am saying about legally, how do you designate the Palestinians in the West Bank? What is their status?

Patel: Said, I understand the question you’re asking, and I – as we’ve said previously, it is vital for both sides to take action to prevent even greater loss, and we condemn any violence, escalation, or provocation.

The West Bank has been illegally occupied by Israel since 1967, and the United Nations Security Council has consistently reasserted that Israeli settlements in the region are a “flagrant violation of international law.”

On January 27, independent journalist Sam Husseini asked Patel whether or not the administration would acknowledge that Israel possesses nuclear weapons, which they’ve had since the 1960s. Once again, Patel would not confirm or deny.

Husseini: Thank you. Archbishop Desmond Tutu died a year ago – a little over a year ago. His last published article was an admonition to this administration entitled, “Joe Biden should end the U.S. pretense over Israel’s, quote, ‘secret’ nuclear weapons.” “The cover-up has to stop,” read the headline. And with it, he called for the U.S. to use laws to cut off funding to human rights abusers, citing Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians as well as nuclear proliferators.

Tutu, of course, headed the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. He ended the piece, “There are a few truths more critical to face than a nuclear weapons arsenal in the hands of an apartheid government.” Will you here today acknowledge the obvious truth that Israel has a nuclear weapons arsenal, or will you continue with this “cover-up,” as the archbishop referred to it?

Patel: What I will say is that we recognize the very real security challenges facing Israel and the Palestinian Authority and condemn terrorist groups planning and carrying out attacks against innocent civilians. And we also mourn the innocent – loss of innocent lives and regret injuries to civilians. But I don’t have any specific comment to offer on what you asked.

Husseini: Israel has had nuclear weapons for decades, and you can’t acknowledge that Israel has a nuclear weapons arsenal?

Patel: I’m going to work the room a little. Alex, go ahead.

Husseini: You expect us to believe what you’re saying from that podium, and you can’t acknowledge the empirical reality of Israel’s nuclear weapons?

Patel: Go ahead, Alex.

Patel’s nonanswers come amid one of the deadliest recent periods for the West Bank and East Jerusalem. On the same day that Patel refused to admit that the West Bank was occupied, ten Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces in a Jenin raid. The next day a Palestinian killed six Israeli settlers and a Ukrainian woman in the illegal settlement of Neve Yaacov. Israel has increased its raids and arrests while Palestinians protest and armed resistance groups carry out operations.

Israeli settlers have also carried out attacks on Palestinian people and property, with the officials reporting 144 incidents of violence on just one recent night. Settlers destroyed 200 olive trees belonging to Palestinian farmers in the villages of Aqraba and Majdel, and attacked an Armenian restaurant in Jerusalem. In Turmus Ayya Israelis threw stones at Palestinians, pepper sprayed them, and vandalized their homes with inscriptions like, “Death to the Arabs” and “Revenge.”

Secretary of State Antony Blinken is currently in Israel, meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “In the context of this..escalating violence, it’s important that the Government and people of Israel know America’s commitment to their security remains ironclad,” Blinken told reporters today. “That commitment is backed up by nearly 75 years of United States support.  America’s commitment has never wavered.  It never will.  And today the prime minister and I discussed ways that we can continue to strengthen our partnership and our shared security interests.”

13 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Let’s see what a former Israeli diplomat has to say about the whole ‘occupation’ brouhaha:

“Nadav Tamir (Hebrew: נדב תמיר; born August 27, 1961) is a former Israeli diplomat. He is currently J Street Israel’s new Executive Director” ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadav_Tamir ).

In this essay from last month in the Jerusalem Post, he writes (emphasis mine)

https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-728528

The United Nations General Assembly decision to seek the opinion of the International Court of Justice in The Hague on whether the Israeli occupation is permanent or temporary should not surprise anyone. Israel has been occupying the West Bank for over 55 years, persistently arguing that under international and Israeli law the occupation is temporary, a transitional situation accepted by international law and enshrined in the Fourth Geneva Convention…The current government has embarked on a fundamental clash with international law due to its intent to transform the occupation into a permanent reality de facto, even if not de jure. Despite the claims of Israel’s political Right that a people cannot be an occupier of its own land and without denying the historical connection of the Jewish people to regions of the West Bank and east Jerusalem, this is also undoubtedly the land of the Palestinians living in these territories…The Palestinians in the West Bank experience violent military occupation, whereas Palestinians living in annexed eastern Jerusalem face discrimination in all aspects of life. In the West Bank, a different law applies to Palestinians and to Israeli settlers living there and in eastern Jerusalem…The new government’s policy reflects a disregard for international law and the norms underlying it. It is important to understand that most countries in the Western world, of which we claim to be a part, regard international law as the infrastructure for their foreign affairs policy….For all those who, like me, think that the eternal domination of the Palestinians is incompatible with our humane and Jewish values, removing the mask may actually be beneficial by exposing the obvious cost of the occupation and making it clear to all that we cannot be part of the enlightened world as an occupying people.

The two US State Department spokespeople, Ned Price and Vedant Patel, are a pair of empty suits who embarrass themselves every time they are asked questions about Israel and its apartheid policies and its nuclear weapons program. They seem to have no shame.

Last night (Thursday Feb 2nd) MSNBC’s Chris Hayes had Rula Jebreal and Peter Beinart on discussing the escalating tension, deaths, expansion of illegal settlements in the West Bank. Went looking for the clip this morning. Not up on “All In With Chris Hayes” FB page, not up on his “All In” website.Hmmmm

We know it is unusual when MSNBC covers this issue accurately. Melissa Harris Perry used to do it, she was canned. Chris Hayes used to dip his toes into the issue when he had his weekend show, very seldom when since he has had his 8 hour spot

Look where I found it and how it is being spun

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kevin-tober/2023/02/03/anti-semitic-msnbc-claims-israel-turned-west-bank-apartheid

We know it is unusual when MSNBC covers this issue accurately. Melissa Harris Perry used to do it, she was canned. Chris Hayes used to dip his toes into the issue when he had his weekend show, very seldom when since he has had his 8 hour spot

My google search only turned up the “NewsBusters” spin

response to my search “It looks like there aren’t many great matches for your search”

If a journalist wants to get a response from an administration official about Palestine, he should focus on the genocide

  1. that white racial supremacist European Zionist colonial settlers started in Dec 1947 and
  2. that has never ceased since then.

Occupation and are not federal crimes, but genocide is a US federal capital crime. Likewise material support to genocide perpetrators is a US federal capital crime. The president foreign policy power but may not assist in the perpetration of a US federal crime. A state department official must respond to a question about active assistance by the USA to an ongoing genocide.

Senator Joe Biden was lead Senate sponsor of 18 U.S. Code § 1091 – Genocide. President Biden is a lawyer and should understand the actus rei, mens rea, and dolus specialis, which constitute the crime of genocide.

It’s worth mentioning that during 1948 in US trials of Nazi officials of the SS Race and Settlement Main Office (Rasse- und Siedlungshauptamt der SS, RuSHA), a US Court convicted Nazi officials of precisely the same crimes that Zionist murder gangs and death squads started to perpetrate in Dec 1947 and have never ceased to commit.These cases are precedents of US federal law.

I saw a relevant Hebrew-language T-shirt:

הכיבוש זה לא הבעיה, זה פועל יוצא.

The occupation is not the problem.

The problem is the Zionist ideology of replacement genocide.

All pro-Palestine advocates should focus on the core crime of genocide and never cease to demand a response from the US government about its support for an ongoing genocide that started in Dec 1947

  1. after the international community banned genocide,
  2. after the international community made this ban jus cogens, and
  3. while a US government court was convicting Nazis of precisely the same crimes that Zionist murder gangs and death squads were perpetrating in Palestine.