What Would You Have Done When the Liberation Army Formed in Darfur?

This is the fourth in a series, How to Think About Darfur, by James North:

Darfur is one of the relatively few places in Africa where the word “tribe” is valid. or decades, Africans have been asking rhetorically why 25 million Hausa speaking people and 10 million Zulu speakers are “tribes,” while 9 million Swedes are a “people,” or a “nation.” “Tribe” implies “primitive,” and also suggests a rudimentary political structure, with chiefs or sheikhs.

In Darfur, the word to some extent fits. The vast desert region contains a mix of peoples, some nomads, some farmers, and tribal structure has persisted despite the national government in faraway Khartoum. Still, everyone is a Muslim, and Arabic is the lingua franca. In physical appearance, everyone is also “black"--although I suspect Darfuris can readily distinguish each other by details of dress.

Gerard Prunier, one of the experts I consulted, explains that Darfur, “though extraordinarily diverse, was in many ways one. Arabs and non-Arabs did not live in peace, but nor did they feud systematically with each other; most conflicts pitted communities or sections of communities against each other, without any reason to attach to them the ‘Arab’ and ‘African’ labels used in the 21st century crisis. Until recently, the categories of “Arab” and “black,” or “African” meant little. Darfur was an ethnic mosaic, not a land divided along binary lines of fracture.”

That started to change in the ‘70s and ‘80s. First Darfur was sucked into the long civil war in Chad, to the west, which did include “Arab versus black” features. The erratic Libyan leader, Col. Muammar Gaddafi supported Chad’s Arabs; Prunier calls Gaddafi a “racist” and an “Arab supremacist.” And Gaddafi’s views started to spill over into Darfur.

Next, the climate in Darfur started changing for the worse, which was one of the causes of the 1984-85 famine, in which 95,000 Darfuris died. (In late 1985 I was just to the east, in Kordofan province, reporting on famine relief there.� The “Arabs” I met were enthused when they learned I was American; they knew that emergency food aid from our country had saved many of them. They asked me to thank Ronald Reagan personally, assuming that just as they knew their political leaders, I knew mine.A few had named their newborn sons for Reagan. I didn’t have the heart to tell them that only citizen action, including by Bob Geldof and the rock stars in Band-Aid, had embarrassed Reagan and other western leaders into doing something.)

Climate change put even more pressure on the already poor region. “Drought leading to an advance in desertification was playing havoc with the ‘Arab’ tribes’ means of survival at the very moment when they were encouraged to see themselves as basically different from their ‘African’ neighbors," Prunier says.

Then, too, the entire region felt neglected by the dictatorial regime in Khartoum. Sudan is best understood not as Arabs dominating Africans, but as a small “Arab” elite, drawn from the heart of the country –Khartoum, and north along the Nile – which uses a combination of brute force and cynical manipulation to maintain its power over the largest country in Africa.

By the early 2000s, many Darfuris were ready to take up arms. They had seen southern Sudanese fight the Khartoum regime to a draw; they had been exposed (and some drawn directly into) the long war next door in Chad. President al-Bashir had held on to power since 1989, and showed no sign of leaving; and his regime had already started encouraging informal armed groups, the janjawiid, to attack certain Darfuri villages--yet another example of the divide and rule strategy the regime had used for years.

When I look into a crisis in the third world, I ask myself what I would do if I lived there. The question is a little self-indulgent; as Graham Greene once pointed out, people like us have the luxury of a roundtrip ticket, and we don’t have to choose.

But over the past 30 years I've grown tired of meeting people, especially Western journalists, who use their privileged status to dismiss conflict in the third world as scorpions fighting in a bottle. And I reflect that in Darfur, when the Sudan Liberation Army formed, it attracted farmers, former soldiers from the regime’s army, unemployed young men, and teachers and intellectuals. And SLA grew out of self-defense groups, formed to protect villages from the janjawiid.

If I were a high school teacher in Darfur, instead of a well-off writer in New York City, would I have joined the SLA in 2003? Or supported it– I don’t have any military training.

I think so.

And, looking back today, would I regret my decision?

Posted in Beyondoweiss, Israel/Palestine, Middle East

{ 6 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. There is some confusion in this article.

    There is a Darfur Liberation Army that is secessionist and could claim to desire liberation from the Khartoum government, but the SLA was founded to conquer the Khartoum government. I suppose one could consider taking over a form of liberation as well, but the distinction is worth mentioning.

    Part of the original SLA is now allied with the Khartoum government.

  2. Richard Witty says:

    Its good that James lends some criticism of the use of the word "tribal" to mean something derogatory.

    (Or does he use it in that manner elsewhere?)

    The distinction between a tribe and a nation is formal institutions of governance. A tribe has institutions of governance, but they are usually semi-formal, ways rather than laws and structures.

  3. 5 dancing shlomos says:

    maybe gaddafi was taking sides opposite western and jewish interference. as for racist, check out axis of racists: usa-israel-england

  4. charles Keating says:

    Re: "I didn’t have the heart to tell them that only citizen action, including by Bob Geldof and the rock stars in Band-Aid, had embarrassed Reagan and other western leaders into doing something."—Phil

    Cf: I didn't have the heart to tell them that only citizen action, including by Jimmy Carter, and the rock-the-boat stars W & M, had embarrassed America's governing elite into doing something.

    Interesting since Africa is not known as the quintessential democratic state, but rather the USA is.

    Does it all depend on what is, is?

    Or is that Izzy?

  5. the Sword of Gideon says:

    Nice shot Keating. I'm assuming you didn't name your kid Moses, or Abraham. I'm thinking Adolph or Mohammed? Enlighten me.

  6. samuel burke says:

    maybe the u.s ought to do a preemptive strike on darfur and murder the murderers so that noone has to die…..if that sounds moronic its because it is….also we the u.s ought to move people around the world from one nation to another by force so that they wouldnt have to suffer through changes in climate…any changes that make humans uncomfortable ought to be remedied immediately by the u.s government by creating a new tax which will help us save the entire world from the changes which are caused by nature…..nature ought to be reengineered so that there will never be any droughts or floods or anything deemed to be bad…..

    we need more laws and taxes because we ought to be able to engineer the world into whatever we wish it to be because we create our own reality…also we need to outlaw being mean and make it punishable by an extended term in a rehab center where the mean person will be completely deprogrammed and reproggamed by the social scientist and social engineer who know just about everything there is to know in the known world.

    yeahh and we can then all live happily ever after…no more meanies anywhere on the planet.

Leave a Reply