Nim Chimpsky takes Weiss's side in the challenge posed by AC the other day, Is Weiss deluded that a sea change is occurring:
This is obvious but since no one seems
to have said it I'll throw my two cents in. The internet is the reason
for rational optimism. Good people have fought this fight before and
failed but the internet's a game changer. It's already revolutionized
and democratized journalism. If we can defeat attempts to filter the
internet (eg, threats to Net Neutrality) we may succeed where others failed.
It's certainly true that a particular sort of elite-level blogger who is not 100% AIPAC-friendly, like Matt Yglesias, can prosper on the internet, whereas ten years earlier he would have been working for The New Republic.
Chimpsky: "If we can defeat attempts to filter the internet (eg, threats to Net Neutrality) we may succeed where others failed."
And where are the threats to filter/censor the internet coming from? Primarily the Left-liberals, often at the behest of Jewish "civil rights" groups like Abe Foxman's ADL by employing so called "hate" laws, and lately ushering them in through the trojan horse of homosexual rights.
Some may not like Ted Pike's Christian proselytizing, but he is a pioneer at documenting just such efforts at his web site,
O my God. You discovered our secret plan! That's right. Every single idea, cause, fight, crusade with Jews as leaders is done to soften criticism of zionism.
You are so smart! They should erect a statue in your honor.
Ed, you should compare your own, religiously oriented explanation above, with Kevin MacDonald's "socio-biological" explanation for exactly the same facts. I don't agree with either one, but it's fascinating stuff.
Indeed, delve into Mac's racist screed. It will certainly improve your disposition.
@chris berel: "Every single idea, cause, fight, crusade with Jews as leaders is done to soften criticism of zionism."
No, but most with staunch Jewish Zionists as "leaders" are. And they aren't really "leaders" at all, but rather opportunists seeking to exploit movements on their own behalf.
Get used to it chris. If you're Jewish and Zionist, pretty soon no one is going to trust you on any issue at all. And it's your own fault for advancing your particular brand of fascism, or allowing Zionism to be steered in that direction.
@ Rowan: "Ed, you should compare your own, religiously oriented explanation above, with Kevin MacDonald's "socio-biological" explanation"
Well, in both instances, the entire "Jewish problem" can indeed be reduced to the survival imperative (religous survival, racial survival), but "survival" for the Jewish Zionist/supremacist isn't merely survival at all, but rather for them, "survival" means lording over/bullying others, and being allowed to conspicuously project their megalomania and viciously exploit others without fear or danger of retribution.
Any large religo-ethnic group whose leaders define "survival" as such is bound to get themselves and often their relatives, co-religionists and co-ethnics holocausted/pogrommed from time to time. It's nearly inevitable until they change their definition of survival.
Jeez Ed, you're starting to sound like quite the racist. Better tone it down or others may question your actual agenda.
@chris: "…racist…agenda…"
You're actually helpful to my agenda, which in part is spotlighting how Western or Zionist racial demagogues (of any race) regularly abuse the victim card, usually to advance their own sinister or greedy political agenda.
As a state founded by Jewish Leftists (a group that, under the "victim" mantle, partnered with Stalinists to murder millions of Christians in the Soviet Union) contemporary Zionists learned their racial demagoguery from the best.
But now it's all so very shopworn. Try not to be such a walking cliché.
"Net Neutrality" is a code-phrase for "let's give government complete control over the internet".
Ed, Shop worn and lifted wholesale from organizations like Stormfront, DDuke, and Zundel.