Haim Saban’s bid. Mondoweiss couldn’t make this up. What Zionist control of the media?
-
-
- Alterman says BDS shares Ahmadinejad’s agenda, and Hezbollah’s too 15
- Fear, the African refugees and the cost of maintaining Israel … 6
- Netanyahu govt to impose fines on mayors of cities that … 24
- Resume builders: Be a broken record on Iran, cheer authoritarians … 31
- UN Committee: Israeli system ‘tantamount to apartheid’ 0
- Slater on Beinart 30
- And we live on… 5
- US official — we went to Israel first 15
-
- BDS victory: South Africa strips Ahava’s ‘made in Israel’ label 714
- Video: Israeli mob demands all African refugees be deported from … 479
- Day after pogroms, Likud MK calls for internment camp for … 436
- ‘This is not fair play’: Mahmoud Sarsak’s family demands his … 399
- March of the Flags 349
- Neocons in Washington Post: Military strike on Iran would ‘calm … 327
- Nabi Saleh’s Bassem Tamimi convicted by Israeli courts based on … 294
- Israel lobby’s favorite senator tries to erase Palestinian refugee status … 236
-
- The Messiah’s Donkey: Settlers fire on Palestinian villagers as the … 237
- Aharon Appelfeld’s rage at the German language (and Arendt’s need … 156
- US to differentiate between ‘personally displaced’ Palestinian refugees and their … 150
- March of the Flags 127
- Affirming a Judaism and Jewish identity without Zionism 120
- Feeling the hate in Long Island 97
- Israeli judge to issue verdict in Rachel Corrie case 94
- Video: Israeli mob demands all African refugees be deported from … 86
-
Recent Comments
click link to see last 100 comments- Slater on Beinart (30)
- Israel lobby’s favorite senator tries to erase Palestinian refugee status for millions (43)
- Alterman says BDS shares Ahmadinejad’s agenda, and Hezbollah’s too (15)
- American: Alterman is just another Zio Supremo…same old, same old. I have heard and seen this statement of...
- traintosiberia: Use of the image of Ahmednezad serves two purposes.One of them is to permanently consign Ahmednezad...
- OlegR: /Palestinians have been left with no choice but to pursue a rights-based agenda (including ROR)/ Shmuel you...
- US to differentiate between ‘personally displaced’ Palestinian refugees and their descendants (150)
- Netanyahu govt to impose fines on mayors of cities that employ migrant workers (24)
- tokyobk: Gamal, please follow the thread from the beginning. I have no love for Sharon and being born in Palestine...
Our Writers
- Philip Weiss
- Adam Horowitz
- Jeffrey Blankfort
- Anonymous
- Jack Ross
- Today in Palestine
- James North and Philip Weiss
- Susie Kneedler
Blogroll
This was reported a week ago. I was about to complain to Phil, “how come you didn’t post this when I e-mailed the Haaretz notation of this?”, but saw that it was Bruce’s name.
I think Haim Saban joining as equal partners with an Arab co-publisher and Arab editorial staff, indicates the oppossite of your thesis.
The wikipedia entry on Haim Saban has a long portion devoted to his feelings about Israel. You’d have to be an idiot not to wonder if those feelings don’t play some teensy bit of a role in his desire to purchase Al Jazeera.
I’m sure they do.
So what?
And now you’re channeling Dick Cheney, Witty. How appropos.
So what?
Nothing like comprising the journalistic integrity of one of the very few influential media operations in the world that do more than simply give all of us Hasbara talking points. But you knew that. Carry on Witty.
Love, Joseph Goebbels.
Witty isn’t as witty as he may think.
Since your first name is Richard, may we call you Dick, in an endearing sense of course?
How would Dick feel if Abbas went and bought Maariv, or Yediot Akhronot or even made a bid for Israel’s channel 2?
Would Dick sit apathetically and say, “So what?”
Richard, Al-Jazeera has been gut punching Israeli credibility for years with its on-the-ground and honest reportage of Israeli government criminality. Do you seriously think that Haim Saban has any objective for purchase of Al-Jazeera other than to buy the power to censor its reportage of Israel? Ah, I see your answer in a comment farther down the page: “So what?”
There can be absolutely no doubt whatsoever in any sane person’s mind that if Haim Saban had owned al-Jazeera at the time of Operation Cast Lead, there would have been no images of the raw carnage transmitted to the rest of the world. That’s Saban’s sole interest in seeking to buy half of the channel. Full stop.
As I said,
Saban assuming 50% ownership (only by consent of those that sell that interest to him anyway), indicates that he is willing to PARTNER with those of different views and perspective.
I don’t know if its a good or not. But, the thesis of “Jewish control of the media” is contradicted by the partnership, not supported by it.
I’ll say this for you Witty, you’re good for a laugh now and then.
Richard,
As so often here at Mondoweiss, you seem to be clueless about what you are commenting upon. Haim Saban does not invest in money hemorrhaging businesses “to PARTNER with those of different views and perspective.” Nothing in his character or past actions would suggest any such motive. He’s a power ranger that plays to win and doesn’t care who gets offended or squashed in the process.
And even Saban doesn’t have the kind of money to pay $5 billion for an investment that has no clear path to profitability. So who is backing his bid?
I hope you are just pulling our chains. Otherwise, you are even more detached from reality than any of us considered possible.
He, like other investors, puts money in with the hope of making more money out of it.
Partnership is a two-way street. You imagine that his Arab partners are not interested in making money, or are unwilling for his participation.
I’m sure there are others with money to invest. Maybe not.
Clueless?
Again,
I’ve been in partnerships. BOTH sides compromise.
I get that you fear that the “fearlessness” of Al-Jazeera will be tarnished.
I think it is a good thing for Arabs and Jews to work together. They’ll have to listen to each other.
Don’t you?
Because that worked out so well for the Palestinians when European Jews came to their country before 1948. Or hell, for the British for that matter, before they surrendered to the original terrorists. Nice precedent for partnership with Zionists that set, didn’t it?
He’s not “clueless”.
He pretends to be “clueless” so as to both exhaust those who debate him as they try over and over to explain their point and get it to sink in and to avoid revealing his cards, so he can turn around the next day and spin it differently.
And just a little tidbit on Al Jazeera: on three occasions (2 in Israel and 1 in Niilin in the West Bank), Al Jazeera has refused to interview Khaled Mahameed (the Palestinian who is featured in my documentary, who presents Holocaust workshops to Palestinians). In Niilin, they refused to interview him, even though they were visiting a small exhibit of Holocaust photos that Niilin villagers decided to put up, after being inspired by meeting Mahameed.
So, I guess Al Jazeera likes to control their “message” as much as any other multinational media conglomerate…
Maybe a little Jewish money might loosen them up (but 50% is probably too high….)
We can expect the same objectivity from Al-Jazeera that we now get from the Saban Center at Brookings, headed by by Iraq war cheerleader Kenneth Pollack.
link to en.wikipedia.org
Al-Zajeera being a Zionist front – is an old story:
“I wish all Arab media were like Al-Jazeera,” – Gideon Ezra, former deputy head of Israeli General Security Service, quoted in ‘Foreign Policy (FP)’, July/August 2006 issue.
Al-Jazeera – Pro-Israel Arab Network
link to rehmat1.wordpress.com
Rehmat, I appreciate the information and perspective you bring to the discussion but… sometimes you post stuff that’s a little… er… out there. I’m not going to argue the specific details in your article, I don’t have the wherewithal to verify them, but to characterize Al-Jazeera as pro-Zionist is… well… kind of ludicrous. I could see maybe some criticism that they go soft on Israel at times (although my experience with al-Jazeera is at odds with that so I would disagree) but to portray it as a “Zionist front” doesn’t make a lot of sense to me.
Who told me, Witty is just ‘blind’?
Look at this clown, he’s a blatant liar.
Just like his approval of Blair’s response to the Buffalo student (ex: Israel left Gaza and it got rockets in return.) – he is again here being a complete dishonest troll and also a liar.
And you wonder why most people here are irritated w/ him. It’s not like he’s stimulating conversation. He’s dragging it down to a 3rd grade level.
Witty simply relies on ‘point-scoring’ rhetoric. He would have been banned long ago if Phil truly cared about sincere debate and not just banning people who have websites named ‘Judeofascists’.
I can sympathize. It’s bad enough that he perpetuates falsehoods, and inadvertently makes Jews bad with the whole “Judaism as the personal human shield of Zionism” technique he’s evolved (nowadays, nothing furthers anti-Semitic stereotypes worse than a Zionist).
But when he makes a mockery of liberalism and progressivism? For me, that’s personal.
“He would have been banned long ago if Phil truly cared about sincere debate”
Phil would have to monitor the comment section 24/7 to ride herd on the debate.
I suggest you read his post on comment standards.
I might mention that over at JSF ( link to jewssansfrontieres.blogspot.com
) Witty would have been banned or more likely warned about his constant prevarication.
You might like their comment section more, prevaricators don’t get much play there.
Cliff, please don’t reject out-of-hand the idea that Witty is Phil (or Adam) when they are manifesting another side of their identity or personality. Sort of a Dr. Jeckelstine and Mr. Hydowitz type of thing. One never knows, does one?
That’s an interesting theory. I have accused Witty of being a public performance piece in the past. Heh.
has it occurred to anyone that just because something is written in an egyptian newspaper doesn’t mean its true? is there ANY evidence that saban might buy al jazeera besides the el-masryoon story? until there is, this is a pointless debate.
Richard says: the thesis of “Jewish control of the media” is contradicted by the partnership, not supported by it.
Um, gee, Richard, I’m as big a fan of hasbara as the next guy, but this is way too intellectually dishonest for any Mondoweisser to swallow.
You want us to believe . . . that Haim Saban . . . is not trying to exercise editorial control . . . over the Arab version of CNN . . . and that he’s hoping to make a “profit” by investing $5 billion in al-Jazeera (which is bleeding money, by the way) . . . and that this is a great example of how Jews don’t want to control the media, but how they . . . um, what exactly are you saying Haim Saban wants to get out of it???
Even a 50% partnership doesn’t mean that ‘both’ sides of the debate will suddenly be heard on al-Jazeera, especially by those who now accuse it of being biased and anti-Israeli. It just means that pro-Israel propaganda and bias would have infiltrated yet another news organization. As if we don’t have enough now with the CNNs and the NBCs of the world.
The link to the Press TV article doesn’t work. Here it is–
link to presstv.ir
“The account comes amid reports that the largest and most controversial Arab news channel in the Middle East is grappling with a terrible financial crisis at present. Saban had previously made an offer to purchase al-Jazeera in 2004, but it was turned down.”