media conspiracy theory

The Israel lobby is an expression of older Jews chiefly. Sidney Harman is as old as Methuselah, almost. His wife Jane Harman, a congresswoman who appears at AIPAC and works for Israel's interests, is 65. Forbes on Sidney Harman's purchase of Newsweek:

“Jane Harman would like to control Newsweek. She is interested in exiting Congress and Newsweek would be a perch for her to be a major player,” says the source. Harman has served in the House for 17 years. If House Democrats lose as many seats this November as polls predict, her new minority status could certainly accelerate such a decision. Harman is the second richest House member and chairs its Homeland Security Subcommittee. Republicans respect Harman’s hawkish national security views. “She’s tough and inquisitive,” says the operative.

About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.
Posted in Beyondoweiss, Israel Lobby, Israel/Palestine

{ 47 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. what exactly is the conspiracy theory?

    newsweek goes from one pro-israel owner (w. post) to another?

  2. potsherd says:

    The media conspiracy isn’t a theory. It’s a fact. Zionism exercises such control of the media that the free press is an exception.

  3. Taxi says:

    If Hartman leaves/loses her seat, then that sure is one big fat hallelujah for California! Whohoooooooo and yippeeeeeedoooooooo!!!

    She can go rot in Newsweek or Newsday for all I care.

    She’s already a known spy for Israel. No doubt the FBI are still watching her.

    Yet, at Newsweek, she’ll be an ordinary citizen (with influence over the stupid), and will therefore have no need to hid her dual loyalties no more.

    Point is, at least my California tax dollars won’t be paying for her extra-curriculum activities in the holy land.

  4. hayate says:

    “She is interested in exiting Congress and Newsweek would be a perch for her to be a major player,”

    Sounds like a game of musical chairs among the aristocracy is afoot.

    She belongs in prison.

  5. Jim Haygood says:

    So a zionist old fart has bought an Old Media outlet.

    Does anyone under 65 actually read that crap? I haven’t seen a copy of Newsweek for years.

    Let’s hope Jane Harman and her AIPAC co-conspirators end up fecklessly talking to themselves, while the world moves on.

    Farewell, Jerusalem Jane. You did a lot to us.

  6. Mack says:

    How is it that this stupid, rotten traitor was never arrested? Why won’t the FBI make a move? What is everyone afraid of?

  7. how ’bout we take it easy on old fartdom. still some beans left in that gang of aging hippies; some of ‘em — the ones with their own teeth — are capable of taking a few bites out of the zionist hide.

    plus, unless Newsweek does a big print edition, those failing over-65 eyes might not be reading the pos either.

    Meacham’s leaving Newsweek; that’s no big loss; he’s weaseled and waffled to try to stay on zionism’s good graces. hope he’s saved enough to retire to some remote island . . .

    • MRW says:

      Some truth to that, PG. Bob Herbert in the NYT yesterday bemoaned the low status for US education among the 24-34 set. We are No 12 among 36 nations.

      The 2000 census (altho’ the info didn’t show up until 2004) showed that, adjusting for age, the most highly educated age group in the US now is 55-65. And it’s all downhill from there.

  8. Sounds like addition by subtraction. Harman out of the House means she’s no longer able to do Israel’s bidding in the odfficial corridors of power. Harman at Newsweek means she’s able to proagandze the great unwashed masses [that's us], but there at least exist some countervailing forces to that.

    Let’s wish this unregustered agent of a foreign power with some obvious and painfully divided loyalties ‘best of luck’ as she enters a new career turn as an ink-stained wretch [figuratively speaking, of course].

  9. marc b. says:

    not to beat a dead horse while its down, but here is another example of the comforting myopia that characterizes the NYT and its readership:

    link to nytimes.com

    the ease with which merkin dispenses her whinging narcissistic commentary, evaluating her various psycho-therapists, in part, on the basis of their ethnicity, is suggestive of a conversation with an intimately known companion, one who can keep an open secret. daphne and 900,000 of her closest, likeminded friends.

    • is it possible to get any more self-absorbed?

      “People turn to Wellbrutin rather than to psychoanalysis….”

      I’m on the last pages of Haggai Ram’s “Iranophobia,” which is a psycho-social analysis of why Israelis hate Iran so much (it’s projection: Israelis see themselves in Iran and hate the image in the mirror — or something like that).
      In the postscript Ram gets really psychological, about all the tortured ways Jews try to fit in to European society and, having been rejected by Europe, determine to gratify their need to be accepted by Europe by creating a European society in the ‘Orient’ where they WILL fit in. Israelis hate Iran (in part because Jews require someone to hate, says Ram) because Mizrahi Jews, which is what Iranian Jews are, remind Ashkenazi Jews of the Jews they were when the Ashkenazi did not fit in to European society. Whew. that’s exhausting.

      As I was reading Ram’s ping pong explanation, I was picturing the Iranians I had seen in Shiraz and Isfehan and Kashan and Nishapur: the Iranian people are completely, unself-consciously, confidently comfortable in their land and in their skin. It is not at all uncommon to see a group of Iranians spread a cloth on the ground — in a park, on the bridge over the river in Isfehan, on the sidewalk in Shiraz, in a parking lot in Kashan — lay out food, prepare tea, sit on the ground and read to each other and recite poetry while their children play nearby. You see this everywhere.
      THAT is what Jewish Israelis cannot stand — because that is what Jewish Israelis want with every fibre of their beings: to belong unquestioningly and unconditionally.
      It’s what we all want.

  10. Les says:

    The Jewishness of the US media dates back to earlier times in the 20th Century when anitsemitism limited opportunities for Jews but it was still possible to get into publishing. Fast forward to the present when the media went from print to audio to video to digital in this age of the superpowerful telecom industry. It would be useful to know why that group of Jews in decision making positions in our media is so remarkably homogeneous in their support for or apology for whatever Israel does.

    • Chu says:

      I would think because to them, Israel is their constructed castle in the desert and has been in the collective imagination of zionists for centuries. Worship it and you will reap many rewards, as you are a soldier of zionism.

      • Les says:

        I still wonder why “2 Jews, 3 opinions” does not apply to the Jewish decision makers in our media regarding Israel/Palestine where we might substitute “101 Jews, 1 opinion.”

        • Keith says:

          LES- It is because of the Zionist ideology which has come to replace Judaism as the unifier of world Jewry, so that a Jew can remain a Jew instead of becoming merely Jewish, or, in the case of secular Jews, just another face in the crowd. One ideology, one people, one opinion on Israel.

        • Les says:

          This site is representative of those Jews who oppose occupation and ethnic cleansing. My original question remains, why does the phrase “2 Jews, 3 opinions” not apply to Jewish decision makers in our media.

        • Chu says:

          good question les. I only imagine it’s an issue that is not up for discussion. Kinda of like voting to cut military spending in the US senate. a sacred cow…

          and it should be 101 jews vs.1 jewish opinion supporting palestine. cause you’ll never see barghouti on the mainstream news, but a jewish representative like baltzer, speaking for palestinians.

    • anitsemitism limited opportunities for Jews

      that schtick is tiresome; it’s the same one that Jerry Muller uses as the intro to “How Jews Invented Capitalism” — that Jews were shut out of everything else and besides Christians weren’t allowed to lend at interest.

      It’s a bogus argument when Muller makes it — and the hundreds of Jewish “historians” who have repeated the premise so often that it’s become a truism — and it’s bogus to say that “antisemitism limited opportunities for Jews.” Bullpucky. Jews have had proportionally more success and enjoyed more prosperity in US than have most other ethnic groups, and some ethnic groups in US have been more and more perniciously shut out of “opportunities” than Jews ever were.

      Jacob Heilbrunn writes in “They Knew They Were Right” that the early neocons were a bunch of Jewish kids who didn’t get into Harvard or Yale, had to settle for City College of NY (it was free at the time, iirc) and were really pissed at the humiliation of not attending an Ivy.
      This was before the mass of Italians, Irish, not to mention Blacks, Hispanics could even get through the front door of the local state college.

      Jewish self-pity is really tiresome.

      • ps. you can begin to suspect Muller’s argument is bogus from the fact that he does not mention the Bank of St. George, the Genoese bank that ran Europe — including the Spanish Empire when it dominated the New World, complete with its hoardes of gold — for over a century. Some Jews worked FOR Bank of St George, but Europe was not bereft of financiers until Jews came along to save the day; Persians, Arabs, Italians knew how to do banking from the time of the great cosmopolitan city of Babylon 400 years BC — which is likely where Jews learned how to do banking.

      • Colin Murray says:

        This was before the mass of Italians, Irish, not to mention Blacks, Hispanics could even get through the front door of the local state college.

        I never thought about it that way. My parents and their siblings fall squarely into that category. They were busting their asses to get access to any kind of higher education (working in factories, nightshift janitorial work, delivering milk at 5AM, etc) during the exact same time frame when these neocon pansies were whining about not getting into Harvard. How much privilege does a neocon need before he starts feeling privileged?

        • Citizen says:

          Ditto for my family Colin. It always annoyed me while reading of how deprived and discriminated against the American Jews were, growing up here since circa WW1. Their novels are filled with this BS. No perspective at all. They were elevated by the guilt-ridden WASP literary establishment during those times while the vast majority of whites were not even in the fictious text-picture book and the blacks were there only as an occasional metaphor stick figure (for the poor [four dimensional] jew character redeux under the red, white, and blue).

    • Citizen says:

      As Judt said, it’s because the US has been manipulated by (minority) identity politics for decades now, but American Jews are uncomfortable with so easily identifying themselves as “Jewish Americans” in public their self-identify is evoked by claiming “Israel” and “The Holocaust.”
      Hence the said homogeneous support.

      Kudos to Judt, and In Memoriam.

      • Citizen says:

        This deceptive form of identity politics was illustrated yesterday on CSPAN’s Washington Journal when a caller asked the guest, “Are you Jewish?” The (gentile male) host cut in and, hanging up on the caller, sternly said
        the question was “irrelevant and wouldn’t be tolerated.” The immediate topic was an aspect of US foreign policy in the Middle East.

  11. radii says:

    So long Jerusalem Jane – we won’t miss you (hell, we won’t quite yet be rid of you) … stinker, traitor, soldier spy

    • Les says:

      Her goal is to be Jerusalem Jane. So far she has functioned in Congress as Tel Aviv Jane. If and when the US can get Abbas to sign away East Jerusalem and vast chunks of the West Bank at a US sponsored Munich pact meeting, Harmon might then lay claim to her long sought trophy.

  12. American says:

    I would think Harman would be of more use to AIPAC and Israel in the congress than at Newsweek…so I am not sure she would leave unless she did get voted out.
    It gives me nightmares that Schumer might be the dem head and that Berman is chair of the Foreign Relations Committee and people like Harman are anywhere close to Homeland Security.

    I keep trying to look forward to see where this horribly unbalanced Israel and zionist influence in our congress leads us in the ME. …will it lead us to some kind of action that will finish off the already dwindling US power and influence, as well as our already almost dead economy?

    I see that Obama’s popularity in Arab nations, almost everywhere actually, has hit rock bottom. They’ve been fooled again by the US.

    One of these days we have get us an actual leader instead of a politican.
    Maybe that will come after the US crashs like Russia or bleeds out in Arabia or Asia.

  13. eGuard says:

    Jon Stewart at ComedyCentral: “why pay one dollar for Newsweek? On internet, it’s free!”

  14. Sand says:

    LOL:

    “Harman’s “wife problem”

    Jack Shafer: “…Your wife problem. Your beloved, Jane Harman, a Democrat, is a permanent member of the U.S. House of Representatives. She’s also 65 years old. As your primary heir, is she the one we should be talking to about Newsweek’s future, not you? Additionally, if you can’t see the problem of your spouse making policy while you make a magazine, I can’t explain it to you, other than to say you don’t want Jane to be to you what Rep. Clare Boothe Luce (R-Conn.) was to Henry R. Luce…

    h/t link to politico.com

  15. Phil..You’re a great writer..no really..Clear, concise, articulate with just enough eloquence to drive your point home..It baffles me to observe that when it’s possible to write so effectively, why would one chose to scribble in such a (voluntarily?) gauche, entangled, obscure and obscured, vague manner as one “writer” here( you know who I guess) usually does to a point where I wonder if the difference is not, simply, that one has a point to make while the other has basically none..

  16. Citizen says:

    Snooki says she’ll be “snookin’ forever.” See Snooki’s personal dictionary.
    Ditto for Harmon.

Leave a Reply