In ‘Int’l Herald Tribune,’ MK Tibi endorses full boycott call

A very significant -- not to mention daring -- statement by MK Ahmad Tibi, Palestinian member and deputy speaker of the Israeli Parliament, explicitly lays out the three key injustices that Israel has perpetrated against the Palestinian people for decades (precisely concurring with those mentioned in the BDS Call as the motives for BDS). He also calls for a full boycott against companies involved in any of these three injustices. He writes:

"Because I believe in ending the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory, equal rights for Palestinians and Jews, and the right of return for Palestinian refugees forced from their homes and lands in 1948, I support boycotting — and calling on others to boycott — all Israeli companies that help perpetuate these injustices."

He left out the need to boycott, as well, all institutions that are implicated in these injustices, but that can be implied.

Despite some misguided language on Israeli "democracy" (perhaps the price for publication in the IHT) being hurt by this draconian anti-BDS law (and that is what this law really is, make no mistake), Tibi's discourse here surpasses that of ANY Palestinian official.

The Israeli Parliament’s antiboycott legislation is an unprecedented effort to undercut nonviolent resistance to Israeli oppression. Many people believe that making nonviolence more difficult will make violence inevitable. I do not. Approving such irresponsible and reactionary legislation highlights Israel’s long decades of injustice to Palestinians and hands us something of a political victory. Through this legislation, Israel has drawn further attention to its violent occupation of Palestinian territory and routine violations of international law.                                                                                                                                                                         

Colonizing settlers and their elected representatives now rule Israel’s political landscape, and few dare to stand against them. This reticence in the face of repeated abuses by settlers reflects poorly on Israeli society and the U.S. government.

One of Israel’s leading newspapers, Haaretz, noted in an editorial that the antiboycott legislation “is a politically opportunistic and antidemocratic act, the latest in a series of outrageously discriminatory and exclusionary laws enacted over the past year, and it accelerates the process of transforming Israel’s legal code into a disturbingly dictatorial document. It casts the threatening shadow of criminal offense over every boycott, petition or even newspaper op-ed. Very soon, all political debate will be silenced.”

More at  IHT.

Update: Original version of this post stated that the piece appeared in the New York Times. The International Herald Tribune is at the NYT site, but the piece did not appear in the Times. 

About Omar Barghouti

Annie Robbins is Writer at Large for Mondoweiss, a mother, a human rights activist and a ceramic artist. She lives in the SF bay area.
Posted in Israel/Palestine

{ 11 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. annie says:

    more from Tibi:

    But this new legal limit on free speech could bankrupt me.

    Israeli officials will not throw me in jail for publicly supporting such boycotts, but settler groups can claim financial damages without even having to show any harm done. Furthermore, organizations supporting boycotts could be denied tax-deductible contributions and state funding. This week, I appealed the law to the high court.

    Already, a member of the Knesset, our Parliament, Alex Miller, has threatened to sue me for my words — specifically my call, which I continue to make today, to boycott the illegal Jewish settlement of Ariel. Such a call would be unremarkable in a proper democracy with untrammeled free speech. The right to criticize a population that has dispossessed Palestinians and discriminated against us for decades should be protected speech.

    Perhaps my parliamentary immunity will protect me, but that can readily be stripped.

  2. mudder says:

    As far as I can tell, Tibi’s piece is for the NYT Global or IHT version only. The U.S. version’s Opinion page does not link to the piece. Apparently the NYT self-censors in the U.S. link to nytimes.com

  3. Donald says:

    Yes, it says at the bottom that it appeared in the IHT. It’s a pattern with the NYT to do this.

  4. Citizen says:

    US Congress moves to ban all aid & recognition of Palestinian entities unless they quit all attempt 2 go 2 UN for state recognition –even where US security at stake! link to t.co

Leave a Reply