News

Podhoretz: Obama is worried that he will get only 1/2 the Jewish money he got in ’08

Thank you, John Podhoretz, in Commentary. He blows away the usual mystification about “Jewish voters” (which Robert Siegel of NPR likes to engage in) and explains why Obama has tacked on settlements/’67 lines/anything to do with Israel/Palestine. This is not just about Jewish success but Jewish identity:

Jews [will vote for Obama] again, and in landslide numbers, in 2012—especially if the Republicans put up someone Jews decide to despise. But which Jews vote or don’t vote for Obama doesn’t matter all that much except when it comes to conversations around the seder table.

Where it matters—where Obama’s team is clearly worried and where it is seeking to come up with counterarguments to give to surrogates—is money. It’s one thing to cast a single vote as the member of a small minority community to which outsized attention is paid. But Jews are uncommonly generous givers, both philanthropically and politically, and while they might still cast a vote for Obama, they might give him nothing. Or half what they gave him in 2008. And that decline in enthusiasm might be reflected not only in giving to the reelection campaign, but to Democratic campaigns generally. That’s the real fear, and that’s the real problem for the Democrats. They have Jewish support at the ballot box. They can bank on that.  They’re worried they won’t be able to bank on Jewish support in the other sense of the term, and that worry is very real, and very realistic, and can’t be argued away.

h/t Justin Elliott, who asks: “cf. what happened to Wesley Clark when he talked about Jewish money in U.S. politics:

27 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments