Matthew Kroenig
Eli Lake at the Daily Beast makes the case for war against Iran, citing a supposedly pristine source:
Matthew Kroenig, who served as special adviser on Iran to the Office of the Secretary of Defense between July 2010 and July 2011, offered some of the possible “red lines” for a military strike in a recent Foreign Affairs article he wrote. He argued that the U.S should attack Iran’s facilities if Iran expels international nuclear weapons inspectors, begins enriching its stockpiles of uranium to weapons-grade levels of 90 percent, or installs advanced centrifuges at its main uranium-enrichment facility in Qom.
In an interview with The Daily Beast, Kroenig also noted that Iran announced in 2009 that it was set to construct 10 new uranium enrichment sites. “I doubt they are building ten new sites, but I would be surprised if Iran was not racing to build some secret enrichment facilities,” Kroenig said. “Progress on new facilities would be a major factor in our assessment of Iran’s nuclear program and shape all aspects of our policy towards this including the decision to use force.”
Stephen Walt at Foreign Policy last week, a piece he then graciously allowed Kroenig to respond to):
If you’d like to read a textbook example of war-mongering disguised as “analysis,” I recommend Matthew Kroenig’s forthcoming article in Foreign Affairs, titled “Time to Attack Iran: Why a Strike Is the Least Bad Option.” It is a remarkably poor piece of advocacy, all the more surprising because Kroenig is a smart scholar who has done some good work in the past. It makes one wonder if there’s something peculiar in the D.C. water supply.
There is a simple and time-honored formula for making the case for war, especially preventive war. First, you portray the supposed threat as dire and growing, and then try to convince people that if we don’t act now, horrible things will happen down the road. (Remember Condi Rice’s infamous warnings about Saddam’s “mushroom cloud”?) All this step requires is a bit of imagination and a willingness to assume the worst. Second, you have to persuade readers that the costs and risks of going to war aren’t that great. If you want to sound sophisticated and balanced, you acknowledge that there are counterarguments and risks involved. But then you do your best to shoot down the objections and emphasize all the ways that those risks can be minimized. In short: In Step 1 you adopt a relentlessly gloomy view of the consequences of inaction; in Step 2 you switch to bulletproof optimism about how the war will play out.
Kroenig’s piece follows this blueprint perfectly. He assumes that Iran is hellbent on getting nuclear weapons (not just a latent capability to produce one quickly if needed)…
Read the rest of Walt’s piece at link.
Kroenig worked in both the Bush and the Obama administrations, another one of those golden-thread-in-the-tapestry cases that unites neocons and liberal interventionists. He is an ass’t professor of government at Georgetown. His website here: http://www.matthewkroenig.com/
This post was provided to me by Annie Robbins. Thank you!
This is directly about the AIPAC crafted sanctions. Wheres the news pointing this out for context during this recent coverage?
Here’s Phil on Dec 08, 2011
What about before this?
In the 1990′s Bronfman and AIPAC in 1995 passed their research to the US government demonstrating how U.S. oil companies were Iran’s biggest customers by far. AIPAC worked with Sen D’Amato (Seymour Reich, Chair of of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations called D’Amato “one of the best, if not the very best senator for Israel”) in passing the bill through the Senate.
AIPAC passed the bill, again, through the senate during the wake of confusion of the 2000 election. Bush, who was still siding with Powell and had not yet kicked him out for the neoconservatives, was furious. Oil companies lost big here and were lobbying to have the sanctions dropped.
Even during the Iraq war, one of the arguments that was used against the lobby was that the target was, all the while, really was Iran. Now the drums are beat against Iran, and its going to be hard to cover up this 800 lb elephant.
You want to succeed in what you are doing???
1.Make sure that brainwashing, daily MSM propaganda is all-mighty and all -powerful. Make sure it is all united in drilling the same stuff in people’s brains.
2.Make sure that, so called, general public reamins ignorant on valid issues.
Feed them the irrevelant pop culture junk, make sure they don’t bother with more important issues. Make sure they stay very, very ignorant, indifferent.
Scare them with a high possiblity of an attack on their country.
The more scared they are, the more they will cooperate.
3.Make sure that the opposition is weak, smear the opposition using all available outlets and methods. Lie, manipulate, make up staff. It does not matter.
The opposition is the enemy of the Power, and needs to be destroyed.
Kroenig is being groomed and grooming himself as one of the next generation of neo/zio/cons who will wander in and out of influential think tanks and adms.
It is unfortunate Iraqis have not brought justice to America’s rulers who advocated for and then perpetrated the invasion of Iraq. It is even worse that Americans have not sought justice for president W. Bush and the war pigs in his cabinet. Perhaps if these criminals had been charged with the crimes they are associated with, one would not have to threaten bringing criminal charges against the next generation of war pigs wanting to bomb Iran. Sooner or later these criminals will be held to account for their crimes, and it will most likely be for the next round of unlawfulness they are planning, which should worry Mr. Kroenig.
gee, with the daily beast/eli lake offering up neocon war mongering who needs to check out frontpagemag. it’s like a one stop shop for the lobby. first josh block and now this. i am so over voices like Kroenig’s. the only time it serves mentioning them is when you’re dressing them down! kudos to walt. kroenig’s just a younger face on kagan or abrams or one of those generic kristols. they are all the same, a neocon is a neocon is a neocon. war war war. i am sick of it!