An American academic who was one of the creators of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and was later fired by the State Department is riling up fear about Iran, claiming that it is about to commit “genocide” against Israel. Gregory Stanton, professor at George Mason University and founder of Genocide Watch, stated last week in a lecture at the Hebrew University that the Islamic republic has already embarked on a path to eliminate Israel, according to the Times of Israel.
“One of the best predictors of genocide is incitement to genocide,” said Stanton, “and I believe that is exactly what Iran is doing today.”
The Times of Israel relates the substance of Stanton’s presentation:
Often, genocide goes unrecognized. In the opening slide of Stanton’s lecture three perplexed diplomats, clutching attaché cases that label them as representing the EU, the US and the UN, look around at a patch of desert, Darfur, that is stained with the bodies of the dead. ‘Well…’ says one; ‘Genocide, genocide…’ says another; ‘Difficult question…’ says the third.
…
Iran, he said, had classified and symbolized Israel through exclusionary ideology and hate speech; dehumanized it – ‘overcoming the normal human revulsion against murder’ — by portraying the potential victims as a ‘cancer’ in need of eradication; organized fanatical militias (the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps); polarized the society by repressing dissent and arresting moderates; prepared for the killing by denying a past genocide and by constructing weapons of mass destruction; and, through global terrorism, even begun the seventh of his eight stages: extermination.
Stanton is known in academic circles for creating an eight-stage system of indicators to determine if a country is going to embark on annihilation. In his lecture, Stanton placed Iran in the seventh—maybe even eighth—stage. But his logic has gaping holes; Stanton is unable to explain why anti-Israel rhetoric from Iran confirms that nuclear war is on the horizon. This same line of thinking was espoused a few days later on “Meet the Press,” when Benjamin Netanyahu said,
Iran is guided by a leadership with an unbelievable fanaticism. It’s the same fanaticism that you see storming your embassies today. You want these fanatics to have nuclear weapons?
The professor’s resume is not only that of an influential scholar of genocide; his diplomatic past includes abuses of Foreign Service privileges to evade prosecution. While working for the Foreign Service in 1998 Stanton allegedly rammed his car into a Virginia video rental store owner after becoming incensed over a $4.50 late fee. At the times the Free Lance-Star reported:
Stanton was accused of hitting Hassan Mostafavi, a McLean video store owner, over the head with a videocassette, then driving his car at the man, knocking him through the plate glass front of a restaurant.
After the incident, Stanton fled to Amsterdam on his diplomatic passport, but then returned to the United States and turned himself in.
A year after the assault charges, Stanton was fired by the State Department for unrelated cause; according to the Times of Israel, Stanton gloated over his dismissal during his Jerusalem lecture:
[I]n the late nineties, he was fired from the State Department. His supervisor, frustrated with his efforts to document what he called ‘the appalling cowardice’ of the Department in April 1994 — when it voted to withdraw all UNAMIR peacekeepers in Rwanda in the face of a mounting genocide — wrote the type of evaluation that she knew would eventually terminate his career. ‘Greg apparently does not understand that the State Department is a hierarchical organization,’ he quoted, with obvious pleasure, during the lecture.
Despite his checkered past, Stanton’s latest lecture demonstrates that the push to war is gaining support from not only government officials, but academics. And in this case an academic who has built a career out of a desire to prevent crimes against humanity. The bulk of Stanton’s published work concerns prevention of genocide in Cambodia and Rwanda.
It cannot be said that Stanton is seeking to understand global politics; instead he is pushing to prosecute and isolate Iran. At Hebrew University he said the Iranian government should be taken to the International Court of Justice in The Hague, and he advocated that other countries should follow Canada’s lead and cut diplomatic relations with Iran.
It is sad that Allison Deger, the author of this blog, either did not attend my lecture, which was on the Eight Stages of Genocide, not mainly on Iran, or just didn’t get it at all. For those who want to view the powerpoint I used for the lecture, they can view it on the http://www.genocidewatch.org website under Eight Stages of Genocide.
I am completely opposed to Israel going to war with Iran, and said so at the lecture.
Instead what I advocated is a new approach to deterring genocide: getting a country that is a State-Party to the Genocide Convention such as Canada to bring a dispute with Iran to the International Court of Justice in the Hague for violation of the Genocide Convention’s Article 3b, which makes it a crime to directly and publicly incite genocide against another national, ethnic, religious or racial group. The case does not have to wait until actual killing. Incitement is a crime in itself.
The author even gets the stage where I place Iran wrong, saying Iran is at stage 7 (Extermination) “or even stage 8” which is Denial.
in fact, Genocide Watch believes Iran is at Stage 6, Preparation for Genocide, exactly the point where legal action could be taken.
Ms. Deger’s personal attack in her Blog are why it is libelous and should be removed from the website.
By dredging up an incident involving me in 1998, the author violates the Blog’s policy number ‘4. No personal attacks. We encourage spirited, passionate debate, but if you have to resort to vicious personal attack, you’re not advancing the discussion. Stay on the issues.’
She doesn’t even get the facts right. She bases her attack on a news article when I was arrested, not after the judge had considered the case. She doesn’t follow the case to its conclusion, in which the chief State Department psychiatrist testified that I had been incorrectly prescribed a triple dose of a powerful medication by a State Department psychiatrist — the cause of this unique episode. I did not drive a man through a plate glass window. I was also never “fired” by the State Department. In fact, when the State Department tried to do so after the incident, I appealed to the Foreign Service Review Board and they ordered me re-instated. The real reason the State Department finally did not grant me tenure was my opposition to US policy during the Rwandan genocide, and continuing insistence on investigating reports of atrocities carried out by Rwandan forces in the Congo in the ensuing US supported Rwandan invasion of the Congo, which I also strongly opposed. I am a life-long opponent of war, which I think is the worst of all policies, except in direct self-defense or to destroy the Air Force of a genocidal dictator like Omar al-Bashir.
The author’s personal attacks reveal the depths to which she will go to discredit my message: that genocide is predictable, that incitement is one of the best predictors of its planning, and that Iran is engaging in such incitement against Israel right now.
Those who choose to ignore or deny this are like the European Jews who would not believe that Hitler would actually do what he openly said he would do from Mein Kampf until the Holocaust.
His credibility should be beyond doubt since he dealt with Rwanda and tried to prevent the horrors there-but once he started to speak against Iran and be “pro” Israel, look how the tables has turned. He is the bad guy now. Judge Goldstone v 2.0 anyone?
The notion of Zionists calling out Shia Muslims as fanatical is laughable. When is Moshiach due to land on the Temple Mount again?
I wonder if this lecture was aimed at the 36% of American Jews who said they wouldn’t support a US attack on Iran if Israel attacked and Iran countered (by attacking Israel)
and that’s the Jewish Daily Forward’s poll…….
At Hebrew University he said the Iranian government should be taken to the International Court of Justice in The Hague
on what pretense? this is insane.
A nut case in search of another genocide to blather about and gain some attention and relevance.
And since the anti semitsm slur might cost him speaking fees he uses Iran as his new crusade.