Why does Goldberg inject Holocaust into Netanyahu’s calculations? (To play us)

Jeffrey Goldberg “guesses” the reason for Netanyahu’s latest attack on the Obama administration. He says Netanyahu is “boiling with frustration” over the U.S. refusing to put clear red lines before Iran, and is at “wit’s end.”  Goldberg suggests Netanyahu is “venting” due to his inability to control his “sheer frustration” at what he sees as Obama’s “obtuseness.”

Then Goldberg speculates:  

It’s not impossible that he would make the Holocaust calculus, which is to say, he believes that stopping a second Holocaust is worth the risk of alienating the U.S., but I think he also knows that we’re far from the moment when a second Holocaust might be possible to contemplate.

Let’s review.  It is “not impossible” that Netanyahu, faced with the great responsibility that history has burdened him with, stopping a second holocaust, is forced to possibly jeopardize the Israeli/U.S. relationship which he holds so dear. Though, Goldberg continues, in his opinion Netanyahu knows that not only aren’t we close to a second holocaust but we are far from the moment when it might even be possible to contemplate.

What is Goldberg up to here with this self contradictory rambling?

I think Goldberg feels a little self conscious warning of a 2nd  holocaust all the time, and he’s not too comfortable placing those irrational thoughts in Netanyahu’s head either. Oh, but how difficult it is to resist the urge! Leaving out the “holocaust” threat would make Israel no different from India when it feared a Pakistani bomb or Japan and South Korea being wary of North Korea going nuclear. That would make Israel’s strategic concerns slightly less apocalyptic. Israel’s fears can never be seen as mundane as other countries. Obviously those analogies have to be avoided at all costs. So the result: total incoherence by Goldberg.

Another thing to note in Goldberg’s piece is the purity of Netanyahu’s motivation. No mention is made of the presidential campaign going on in the U.S. and how Netanyahu’s statements will likely be used by the Republicans. Why couldn’t Netanyahu wait 8 weeks until after his election to “vent?” What one comes away with after reading Goldberg is that political considerations are the furthest thing from Netanyahu’s mind.  He is after all too focused on saving the Jewish people. But see the front page story of the NY Times  today, where in the first paragraph talks about Netanyau “inserting” himself in presidential campaign.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel inserted himself into the most contentious foreign policy issue of the American presidential campaign on Tuesday, criticizing the Obama administration for refusing to set clear “red lines” on Iran’s nuclear progress that would prompt the United States to undertake a military strike.

No room in Goldberg’s analysis for that!

I challenge the reader to find Goldberg writing about anyone other than a right wing Israeli politician (or someone who shares those views) with the same lack of journalistic cynicism. No wonder Goldberg has been called “Netanyahu’s stenographer.”

About Yakov Hirsch

Yakov Hirsch is a writer and poker player who lives in New York
Posted in Israel/Palestine

{ 7 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. Kathleen says:

    The Netanyahu making threats towards the U.S. not on the Huff Po front page anymore. Getting lots of comments, lots of attention. No longer

    • Krauss says:

      I read the comments in the NYT story. Over 600 of them.

      Man, the top 10 or so of ‘top picks by the readers’ were some of the most gruelling stuff I’ve read from a mainstream crowd.

      More than one openly proposed of ‘parting our ways from Israel’.

      What folks like Goldberg and other Israeli lobbyists thinks or not is irrelevant.
      The American people is already moving on.
      70 % are against a unilateral strike!

  2. Bumblebye says:

    There’s another element to consider – what happens to Netanyahu & Co when all his attempts to take the US to war, as well as inserting himself into the US election, fail? Where will Israel be when his coalition likely crumbles, and who will be elected instead? What position would the US take (in spite of the zio donors) if the country elects a government even further to the extreme right – which seems highly possible. This facing Bibi down could be the start of real change in the US/Israel relationship.

  3. Les says:

    Zionists are only part-time Americans. This is just the latest of Goldberg’s many non-American outbursts.

  4. RE: “Goldberg suggests Netanyahu is ‘venting’ due to his inability to control his ‘sheer frustration’ at what he sees as Obama’s ‘obtuseness’.” ~ Yakov Hirsch

    A DIFFERENT TAKE: Netanyahu is a narcissist who is very susceptible to ‘narcissistic rage’.

    FROM WIKIPEDIA [Narcissism]:

    (EXCERPT) . . . Narcissists hold unreasonable expectations of particularly favorable treatment and automatic compliance because they consider themselves special. Failure to comply is considered an attack on their superiority, and the perpetrator is considered an “awkward” or “difficult” person. Defiance of their will is a narcissistic injury that can trigger narcissistic rage. Defiance of their will is a narcissistic injury that can trigger narcissistic rage. . .

    SOURCE – link to en.wikipedia.org

    • P.S. ALSO SEE: “Is There a Way Beyond Israeli Madness?” [Will the Chosen People and the Exceptional People Go Down Together?] ~ by John Grant, Counterpunch, 8/31/12

      [EXCERPTS]
      “The patient, by the name of Israel, walks into the room and instantly bursts into a tirade of arguments conclusively proving his credentials, and says that he is better than everyone else.” ~ Ofer Grosbard, ‘Israel On The Couch: The Psychology of the Peace Process’

      Americans have an Israel problem. . .
      . . . The problem Americans have with Israel is that the region it exists in is in the midst of a major political sea change, while Israel is frozen in time and holding on to its militarist, right-wing policies of extending settlements in the West Bank. It’s a policy that harks back to the ideas of the British-trained militarist Ze’ev Jabotinsky’s Iron Wall, which is based on the idea a live-and-let-live policy between Jews and Arabs is impossible and, thus, Jews must militarily control and repress Palestinians [i.e. the mindset of the "pale" - J.L.D.] . . .

      . . . How does a people turn back a racially-oriented demonization program with roots that extend back many decades? How do you ratchet down a nation’s narcissism so people are able to simply see the other as a human being? . . .
      . . . On our part, Americans and the United States need to stop being a permissive yes-man and begin to show Israel some tough love. We need more US criticism of Israel. No doubt this approach will be received with gales of cynical laughter from hardliners . . . but so what?
      In my mind, the Israeli narcissistic and arrogant mindset would benefit from a little Buddhist detachment, more of the posture that sees the world not of separate individual selves and egos but of human beings as part of a larger flow of life. The Buddhists call the self-obsessed, separatist state-of-mind [i.e. the "pale" of Israel surrounded by Ze’ev Jabotinsky’s Iron Wall* - J.L.D.] that Israel thrives on and defends with weapons as “the illusory self.”
      “Once one identifies with a permanent self-concept, the pride and craving adhering to this become the pivot from which an egocentric world arises,” writes Gay Watson, a psychotherapist attuned to Buddhism.

      David Loy puts it this way: “To become completely groundless is also to become completely grounded, not in some particular, but in the whole network of interdependent relations that constitute the world.”
      I’m not suggesting Israel become a Buddhist nation. The point is for Israelis, and more important Americans, to figure a way out of the worsening condition of “us versus them” to avoid the need to obliterate them and set off a war that no one really wants. The point is to re-shape our minds to make “the other” less threatening to permit talking.
      I’m not holding my breath that Benjamin Netanyahu and Avigdor Lieberman are going to become peace activists. But I’m done as an American being a silent stooge [i.e. a habitual "enabler" ~ J.L.D.] while Israeli militarist madness fuels hatred and sets the stage for war.

      ENTIRE COMMENTARY – link to counterpunch.org

      * P.S. Personally, I believe Israel’s Likudniks consider (at least subconsciously) Iran’s nuclear program to be a potential breach in Ze’ev Jabotinsky’s Iron Wall. And they expect the US to help them maintain their precious “Iron Wall” which enables them to do whatever the hell they want to do (like colonize the West Bank).

  5. HRK says:

    This was a great post!

    I was chuckling as I read it.

    Thanks!