Hillel Ottawa new social media policy bans mentions of Israel boycotts as ‘hateful rhetoric’

Israel Awareness Committee at the University of Ottawa clubs day. (Photo: IAC)

Israel Awareness Committee at the University of Ottawa clubs day. (Photo: IAC)

Hillel Ottawa, through its Israel advocacy wing, the ‘Israel Awareness Committee’ (IAC), has recently released its ‘Social Media Code of Conduct’, which bans virtually all posts that are critical of Israel. While the IAC, being an integral part of Hillel, is meant to serve the campus Jewish community, it only provides a space for unabashedly pro-Israel voices within its midst. This is part of a growing trend across diaspora Jewish communities, in which censorship is being used to silence critics of Israel.

The IAC describes itself as being “dedicated to engaging in debate, discussion, and dialogue on Israeli society, culture, and politics.” However, its Social Media Code of Conduct states that “All articles/links/blogs etc. must come from a source (or be written by an author) that supports the Two-State Solution.” That stipulation not only silences any members of the Jewish campus community who are opposed to an ethno-nationalist state for Jews in historic Palestine, but even Zionist members of the community who are beginning to lose hope in the corrupt “peace process”, and are interested in discussing alternative visions for a just and lasting peace in Israel and Palestine. It is also worth noting that Hillel Ottawa supports illegal settlement products, and has shown no indication of supporting a two state solution based on Israel’s pre-1967 borders.

Just as stifling for open debate, the IAC also claims that it will “remove posts that endorse Boycotts, Divestments, and/or Sanctions of Israel or of Israeli businesses,” and that it considers support of these initiatives to be “hateful rhetoric.” By using the term “hateful” in reference to support for the Palestinian non-violent campaign to boycott and divest from Israel and/or companies profiting from the illegal occupation of Palestinian lands, Hillel Ottawa is equating support for non-violent resistance against occupation to hate speech. This is reminiscent of the now defunct ‘Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism’, which attempted to create legislation that BDS be considered hate speech in Canada.

As the ‘Open Hillel’ movement in the United States has demonstrated, Hillel International’s guidelines prohibit partnering with organizations or sponsoring events that “delegitimize” or “demonize” Israel, or that promote BDS in any way. This automatically sanctions any coordinated discussion or debate with Palestinian students or organizations on campus (or their supporters), or Jewish students who do not identify with the vague and restrictive guidelines imposed by Hillel around discussing this issue. These guidelines have even prevented Hillel from inviting liberal Zionist speakers or partnering with groups who would bring such speakers, such as former Israeli Knesset member Avraham Burg, writer Peter Beinart, and the Israeli organization ‘Breaking the Silence’.

While there is a growing number of young Jews who are questioning the Zionist narrative that we were brought up to believe, Hillels across North America (and beyond) are failing to encourage open and honest engagement with the issue of Palestinian rights. Funding plays a large part in this, since Hillels in Canada are supported financially by the local Federations. These Federations, which control community funding allocations, are vested with enormous authority, and influenced by large (Zionist) donors.

Therefore, it is not only the Hillels that are silencing progressive Jewish voices—the Jewish Community Centre of Ottawa, funded like Hillel by the local Federation—refuses to rent space to Independent Jewish Voices (IJV) for an event, since  IJV “advocates for positions that run counter to the objectives of the Jewish Federation of Ottawa.” Rather than widening the tent to include voices that do not serve the continued interests of the State of Israel, the organized Jewish community in Canada is locking down, preventing any honest discussions about Israel and Palestine from taking place.

IJV strongly supports Swarthmore Hillel, and a growing number of Jewish institutions in North America and beyond who are fighting for the right to discuss justice for Palestine in their respective communities. Jewish voices of resistance must continue to demand openness and discussion in their respective communities if we are ever to liberate ourselves from the shackles of Zionism.

About Tyler Levitan

Tyler Levitan is the Campaigns Coordinator for Independent Jewish Voices – Canada. He is based in Ottawa on unceded Algonquin territory.
Posted in Activism, American Jewish Community, BDS, Israel Lobby, Israel/Palestine

{ 8 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. ritzl says:

    So would Hillel Ottawa censorship be a Boycott (of ideas), a Divestment (of members of the community), or a Sanction (for heresy)?

    Thanks for the article. Much success opening up the debate.

  2. pabelmont says:

    Would Hillel (Ottawa) consider a factual “post” to be forbidden if that “post” mentioned that Israeli Knesset had passed an undemocratic law? (I mean, some people seem to think such a thing has happened.) I am not talking abiout a “post” CHARACTERIZING the law, merely one mentioning it (and its provisions, of course).

    In short does one criticize Israel merely by correctly reporting its doings? Isn’t that what we’ve all been doing for a long time? No, I agree, no it isn’t, because we DO characterize.

    BTW, what is a “post” which is forbidden? Need it be on a Hillel web-site? And if it is not, does it become Kosher? Or are the fully-general all-knowing thought-police out and about?

  3. This reminds me of a story some friends of mine told me about their arab neighbors in Montreal. The Arabs were afraid of interacting with others because they were watched by their state police, so they couldn’t say anything bad about their home countries or interact with groups or people that were considered enemies.

  4. Philip Weiss says:

    the organized Jewish community in Canada is locking down, preventing any honest discussions about Israel and Palestine from taking place.

    sad, but unsurprising. exposure of the truth is their worst nightmare.

  5. Sumud says:

    RE: the photo, I’m not sure if they realise just how desperately uncool this “I love Israel” schtick must appear to a majority of young people on campus.

    “You love Israel? Um, OK, good for you”
    “That’s nice”
    “Off you go then”
    “Why are you wearing sunglasses inside?”
    “And do you love Canada too?”
    “And what does any of this have to do with me?”
    “Wow who paid for all these brochures?”
    “So you are pro-apartheid then?”
    “You don’t seem very aware about what’s really happening in Israel”
    “Eeew why would I want to have sex in a nightclub toilet?”

  6. Sumud says:

    Seems like Israel Awareness Committee may have retroactively violated Hillel’s new guidelines, they hosted an event in 2010 with speaker Prof Mark Rosenblum speaking on:

    “Paradise Lost: Is a two state solution still possible?
    If so, how do we get there?
    If not, what next?”
    link to ottawaiac.blogspot.com.au

  7. Walid says:

    “However, its Social Media Code of Conduct states that “All articles/links/blogs etc. must come from a source (or be written by an author) that supports the Two-State Solution.”

    Can one be critical Israel’s apartheid while being supportive of the 2-states along 67 borders?

  8. amigo says:

    If we ignore it–will they go away.

    Unbelievable.