News

Time for world leaders to stop inflating Israel’s bubble of denial

Angela Merkel and Benjamin Netanyahu
Angela Merkel and Benjamin Netanyahu

The 24-hour visit by German chancellor Angela Merkel to Israel this week came as relations between the two countries hit rock bottom. According to a report in Der Spiegel magazine last week, Merkel and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu have been drawn into shouting matches when discussing by phone the faltering peace process.

Despite their smiles to the cameras during the visit, tension behind the scenes has been heightened by an diplomatic bust-up earlier this month when Martin Schulz, the president of the European parliament and himself German, gave a speech to the Israeli parliament.

In unprecedented scenes, a group of Israeli legislators heckled Schulz, calling him a “liar”, and then staged a walk-out, led by the economics minister Naftali Bennett. Rather than apologising, Netanyahu intervened to lambast the European leader for being misinformed.

Schulz, who, like Merkel, is considered a close friend of Israel, used his speech vehemently to oppose growing calls in Europe for a boycott of Israel. So how did he trigger such opprobrium?

Schulz’s main offence was posing a question: was it true, as he had heard in meetings in the West Bank, that Israelis have access to four times more water than Palestinians? He further upset legislators by gently suggesting that Israel’s blockade of Gaza was preventing economic growth there.

Neither statement should have been in the least controversial. Figures from independent bodies such as the World Bank show Israel, which controls the region’s water supplies, allocates per capita about 4.4 times more water to its population than the Palestinians.

Equally, it would be hard to imagine that years of denying goods and materials to Gaza, and blocking exports, have not ravaged its economy. The unemployment rate, for example, has increased 6 per cent, to 38.5 per cent, following Israel’s recent decision to prevent the transfer of construction materials to Gaza’s private sector.

But Israelis rarely hear such facts, either from their politicians or media. And few are willing to listen when a rare voice like Schulz’s intervenes. Israelis have grown content living in a large bubble of denial.

Netanyahu and his ministers are making every effort to reinforce that bubble, just as they have tried to shield Israelis from the fact that they live in the Middle East, not Europe, by building walls on every side – both physical and bureaucratic – to exclude Palestinians, Arab neighbours, foreign workers and asylum seekers.

Inside Israel, the government is seeking to silence the few critical voices left. The intimidation was starkly on display last week as the supreme court considered the constitutionality of the recent “boycott law”, which threatens to bankrupt anyone calling for a boycott of either Israel or the settlements.

Tellingly, a lawyer for the government defended its position by arguing that Israel could not afford freedom of expression of the kind enjoyed by countries like the US.

Illustrating the point, uproar greeted the news last month that a civics teacher had responded negatively when asked by pupils whether he thought Israel’s army the most moral in the world. A campaign to sack him has been led by government ministers and his principal, who stated: “There are sacred cows I won’t allow to be slaughtered.”

Similarly, last week it emerged that a Palestinian from East Jerusalem had been interrogated by police for incitement after noting on Facebook that his city was “under occupation”.

Outside Israel, Netanyahu is indulging in more familiar tactics to browbeat critics. Tapping European sensitivities, he accused those who support a boycott of being “classical anti-semites in modern garb”. Netanyahu justified the allegation, as he has before, on the grounds that Israel is being singled it out.

It looks that way to Israelis only because they have singularly insulated themselves from reality.

Western critics focus on Israel because, unlike countries such as North Korea or Iran, it has managed to avoid any penalties despite riding roughshod over international norms for decades.

Iran, which is only suspected of secretly developing nuclear weapons, has been enduring years of savage sanctions. Israel, which has hidden its large stockpile of nuclear warheads from international scrutiny since the late 1960s, has enjoyed endless diplomatic cover.

Contrary to Netanyahu’s claim, lots of countries around the world have been singled out for sanctions by the United States and Europe – whether diplomatic, financial or, in the case of Iraq, Libya and Syria, military.

But the antipathy towards Israel has deeper roots still. Israel has not only evaded accountability, it has been handsomely rewarded by the US and Europe for flouting international conventions in its treatment of the Palestinians.

The self-styled global policemen have encouraged Israel’s law-breaking by consistently ignoring its transgressions and continuing with massive aid handouts and preferential trade deals. In Germany’s case, one of the most significant benefits has been its decision to supply Israel with a fleet of Dolphin submarines, which allow Israel to transport its rogue nuclear arsenal around the high seas.

Far from judging Israel unfairly, Schulz, Merkel and most other western leaders regularly indulge in special pleading on its behalf. They know about Israel’s ugly occupation but shy away from exercising their powers to help end it.

The reason why popular criticism of Israel is currently galvanising around the boycott movement – what Netanyahu grandly calls “delegitimisation” – is that it offers a way for ordinary Americans and Europeans to distance themselves from their governments’ own complicity in Israel’s crimes.

If Netanyahu has refused to listen to his external critics, western governments have been no less at fault in growing impervious to the groundswell of sentiment at home that expects Israel to be forced to take account of international law.

Both Merkel’s diplomatic niceties and her shouting matches have proven utterly ineffective. It is time for her and her western colleagues to stop talking and to start taking action against Israel.

A version of this article first appeared in The National, Abu Dhabi

9 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is an excellent article, it may be that Germany will be reluctant to upset Israel, they should take a leaf out of tiny Luxembourg’s policy..Luxembourg’s general pension fund (FDC) has decided to boycott five Israeli banks due to their illegal activities in West Bank settlements.
The Israeli website Walla reported that the state-affiliated pension fund of Luxembourg has decided to boycott all major banks in Israel.
The website pointed out that despite the small size of the state of Luxembourg in Europe; it constitutes a major hub in the world’s investment and finance. https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/europe/9986-luxembourg-announces-boycott-of-8-israeli-companies

Naftali Bennett comes across as being completely unhinged in this Feb. 14 BBC HARDtalk interview with Stephen Sackur who does a pretty good job of giving Bennett as much rope as he wants. http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/ht

His thinking and speech has a cult-like quality which is quite creepy to behold.

The writer here ignores the broader perspective in regard to the US and EU moves on Israel – perhaps because Israel has been for decades now his only real focus. There is little question that the US and Europe leadership is hundred times more concerned now about what goes on in Syria, Lebanon and Egypt, or Ukraine, or Turkey, or potential financial collapse of Greece, Spain, Portugal and Ireland and then the Euro – and that`s just the main headlines. Israel is a footnote in today`s long list of real big problems. And besides would they really want to add yet another big REAL problem (as different from a subjectively bloated one) to the list?

Merkel’s Momentous Middle-East Mistake

German Chancellor, Angela Merkel’s ill-timed visit to Israel is made notwithstanding that German-Israeli relations are at their lowest ebb as a result of Israel’s illegal settlement activity that continues to cause anger throughout the EU as it negates the US brokered, Mideast peace agreement negotiations.

Merkel has a difficult relationship with Israel’s Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu. However, this did not prevent her inexplicable decision to increase to six the supply of Dolphin Class, nuclear-powered, diesel-electric, AIP submarines developed and constructed by Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft AG., for the Israeli Navy.

Israel has modified those war vessels already delivered, each now being armed with long-range, (SLCM) cruise missiles equipped with nuclear warheads, plus a maximum of 16 torpedoes: a naval task-force capable of destroying most of the Middle East. It also gives the Israeli state an offshore, second strike, nuclear capability.

Germany itself has no such offensive nuclear armament, neither has either France or Britain, of such size and power, for Israel is estimated to also possess up to 400 nuclear warheads. All of which means that Merkel has effectively made Israel into the most powerful nuclear weapons state outside of the US and Russia!

The rationale for Merkel’s strategic error in altering the balance of power not only in the Middle East but also in Europe with consequences yet to be determined, is unknown.

In the meantime, the German Chancellor would have been well-advised to follow the example set last week by the British Prime Minister, David Cameron, and to have cancelled her visit to the Middle East.

It is too late, of course, to reverse her inexplicable decision to deliver a fleet of (now) SLCM-armed, nuclear-equipped, undersea, war machines to the most contentious piece of land on earth.

A wonderful summation, Jonathan!

“It is time for her and her western colleagues to stop talking and to start taking action against Israel.”

How I hope that this comes to pass. Sanction the heck out of Israel! BDS on steroids with an enormous apology to all in the region……..but mostly, every single Palestinian.