Opinion

A Palestinian perspective on the U.S. election

Last week witnessed the election of a new American president. Elections in the U.S. can have massive impacts across the world. So, what do the results mean for us Palestinians?

Donald Trump’s administration was undoubtedly the most far-reaching in its complete adoption of an agenda favoring Israel’s right-wing settlers occupying Palestinian territory in the West Bank. Is Joe Biden going to be any different?  

That is what was raised by most Palestinians over the past few days, and just as often the response was to shrug off the question. 

Endless Israeli-Palestinian negotiations have so far not led anywhere in spite of numerous visits by U.S. secretaries of state and peace envoys to the region. And every single time, Palestinians were faulted for the failure of the talks. Whenever high-level talks ensue, the Palestinian leadership is expected to respond positively to any new initiative made by whatever American president is in office, in spite of the continuing hermetic, medieval siege imposed on Gaza. The siege has so far led to the death of dozens of critically ill patients who were not able to receive treatment locally.

In the West Bank there are around 100 checkpoints slicing communities, and the ever growing apartheid wall that expropriates more and more Palestinian land. 

There are around 4,500 Palestinian political prisoners including 40 women and 170 children. These are but a few examples of the horror inflicted on Palestinians. We know that any American initiative will not discuss these major issues that characterize the Palestinian question. And, likely, no initiative will seek what was once the standard for an agreement: the withdrawal of Israeli forces to the 1967 borders, support of the right of return for Palestinian refugees and recognition of East Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine. 

Indeed, no American administration has been an honest broker in the conflict. On the contrary, the U.S. has always shown a pro-Israel slant. Washington rarely exercised its leverage to make any substantive progress toward achieving peace based on justice during Barack Obama’s presidency. Instead, in 2016 the Obama administration gave Israel $38 billion in military assistance over a decade, the largest such aid package in U.S. history. And at the peak of campaign season that same year, both Democrats and Republicans competed to see who could be most strident in defense of the Jewish State.

The Trump administration then cut funds to the Palestinian Authority, closed the Palestinian Mission in Washington, de-funded UNRWA, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees. If Biden reverses all of these measures, it does not mean the end of the conflict. 

If Biden is serious about creating a comprehensive peace in the Middle East by resolving the Palestinian question, he cannot and should not ignore the right of return of 6 million refugees scattered all over the world. Nor can he take the promises of Benny Gantz and Benjamin Netanyahu seriously. If the Palestinians decide to go back to the negotiating table and resume security coordination with Israel without fundamental changes to the paradigm, they will prove that history is repeating itself as both tragedy and farce. A heavy price is going to be paid, again.

The alternative?

We should send a strong message to the new administration that the rules of the game have changed, and that we Palestinians will return to the negotiating table only after Israel abides by international law. First, it must withdraw troops from the lands it occupied in 1967, second, it should revoke discriminatory basic laws including the Nation State Law, and third,  it should implement United Nations resolution 194, allowing for the return of Palestinian refugees. 

These were once the benchmark of what was needed to secure an independent state of Palestine alongside Israel, yet Israel has never responded positively to these parameters. Today, these basic steps and the path of a two-state solution is essentially dead and the only democratic alternative should be put on the table: a secular, democratic state for all. Now is the time for a state for all of its citizens regardless of religion, ethnicity, and sex. Surely, our natural progressive allies within the Democratic party can play a role in exerting pressure on their leadership in this regard. 

The Biden-Harris administration should be reminded by the Palestinian leadership, day and night, of its responsibilities. The left-wing of the Democrats who helped secure Biden’s win are the same activists who support Palestinians. Tapping into this base could shape the direction of the next administration’s policy in the region. Are we up for it?

11 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“…the U.S. has always shown a pro-Israel slant.” In an effort to understand the roots of this behavior I got a copy of “Our American Israel – The Story of an Entangled Alliance” by Amy Kaplan (you can check out the book on Amazon). Page 5:

The phrase “our American Israel” comes from a Puritan expression of colonial American exceptionalism. In 1799 [that’s right – 1799], Abiel Abbot, a Massachusetts minister, preached a Thanksgiving sermon titled “Traits of Resemblance in the People of the United States of America to Ancient Israel”. The sermon starts by noting common usage at the time: “It has been often remarked that the people of the United States come nearer to a parallel with Ancient Israel, than any other nation upon the globe…” The parallel with biblical Israel conferred an exceptional identity on the United States right from the start.

Kaplan’s website:
https://www.english.upenn.edu/people/amy-kaplan

A must read!!!
https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/11/13/hey-joe-a-memo-to-biden-on-palestine/

”Hey Joe: a Memo to Biden on Palestine” by Stanley L. Cohen, Nov.13/20
EXCERPTS:
“Five years later, in the summer of 2014, Joe Biden got another stark, deadly reminder of just what it is to be a Palestinian in the cross hairs of a colonial fiend hell bent on relegating them en masse to the history of the disappeared. During Israel’s unhinged six week rampage on Gaza it dropped 40,000 tons of explosives on more than 5200 ‘targets’. At its end, some 2200 were slaughtered, including 550 children, & some 10,000 injured. Almost all the victims were civilians. More than 1900 children were orphaned, hundreds of thousands of civilians internally displaced with 20,000 homes, 26 NGO service providers, a half-dozen UNRWA facilities, 23 hospitals & health-care facilities, 133 schools, 360 factories, 50,000 acres of crop lands & half of Gaza’s poultry stock targeted & destroyed or damaged by Israel.”

“What, then, deciphers the political rhetoric of Obama/Biden to display the true nature of their largely unbounded support of a European colonial project committed to the eradication of an age-old indigenous population… whether by siege, violence, or categorical expulsion? During the eight years of Obama/Biden, that translate was not at all hard to find. There was, after-all, nothing subtle about Israel’s drive to punish Palestinians, for little more than their mere existence, during the time that Joe Biden readied himself to move from front row seat to oval office desk. Just several weeks before taking power in 2008, the future President got a primer on Israeli brutality through the lens of ‘Operation Cast Lead.’

“With an opening salvo of war crimes on December 27, 2008, the first day of the operation, Israel bombed the main police headquarters in Gaza City, killing 42 police cadets standing in formation without weapons. Later that day, it bombed some 18 other police stations throughout the Gaza Strip. In total, 248 police officers were killed that day having not fired a single round at Israeli forces…”

There is a very easy way to end the siege of Gaza. The Arabs or Gaza should tell the Arabs of Egypt to just open the gates. I wonder why they wont just do that. That would end all the problems right?

The people who think that palestinian exceptionalism is the way to go have their head in the sand.

Here are some examples of that exceptionalism:

  1. Refugees are the people displaced in a conflict, and not their descendants. want proof? look at literally every single other conflict in the world in the last 70 years.
  2. An armistice line is not a border, and does not have any legal standing. Expecting a border to magically appear just because one side wants it without any negotiation is exceptional.
  3. Arabs had control of Jerusalem for 1000 years and have never made it the capital of anything. Nada. Zilch. Requiring any part of Jerusalem to be an Arab capital of anything is just a political ploy. You want a capital, make one wherever most of your population is. Ramalla, Gaza city, wherever you control.

Thinking that 70 years of failure is going to somehow change magically by repeatedly saying the same thing over and over is the epitome of exceptionalism.

Its called negotiation, and if you’re the weaker party then you suck it up and make the best deal you can. Just ask the Jews of 1948 what that’s like.

Dear Haidar Eid, sure would like to hear about what you and other Palestinians think about Biden’s Secretary of State pick….Antony Blinken?

So now with Biden’s Secretary of State choice Tony Blinken, Pompeo’s last gifts to Israel will be firmly cemented and not challenged at all by the Biden administration. Israeli companies on illegally occupied Palestinian land can label themselves “Made in Israel” or labeled whatever they choose with Antony Blinken being appointed. Netanyahu’s continued expansion of Illegal settlements, annexation, all right on track with Blinken as Secretary of State
He helped come up with the Obama Syria strategy, a human tragedy.. Following that PNAC middle east blueprint.
Even represented some Israeli companies and “Fortune 100 types” Biden on track with expanding U.S. empire and disasters in middle east.
“Biden administrationBlinken was a foreign policy advisor for Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign.[34] On June 17, 2020, Blinken said that Biden “would not tie military assistance to Israel to things like annexation or other decisions by the Israeli government with which we might disagree.”[35] On November 22, 2020, Bloomberg News and The New York Times reported that Biden had selected Blinken as his nominee for Secretary of State.[3][4]
Biden might as well have selected Ivanka or Jared Kushner as SOS. Netanyahu can check off his ok for Bidens choice for the U.S. Secretary of State box. Same as it ever was.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Blinken