Opinion

Coming face to face with Zionist fragility

The Israel Fellow for Carnegie Mellon Hillel flew into a rage when two Muslim student leaders refused to endorse a propaganda-filled "fact finding" trip to Israel. They say the fellow's response serves as a microcosm of Zionist behavior and attitudes.

As college students, we’ve certainly been in some chaotic situations, but we never would have expected to have found ourselves trapped in a small room on campus with an ex-IDF soldier, as he hurled false insinuations of antisemitism at us while simultaneously declaring that our attitude was the reason people will continue dying in Gaza.

Adam (to avoid any legal issues, we chose to use a fake name), the Israel Fellow for both the Carnegie Mellon and University of Pittsburgh Hillel chapters, probably meant well at first, but I also have no idea what he expected when he decided to reach out to both the Carnegie Mellon Muslim Students Association (MSA) and FORGE, Carnegie Mellon’s refugee service organization, advertising a free spring break trip to the Middle East, entitled “Carnegie Mellon Fact-Finders 2020,” billed as an unbiased presentation of both sides of the conflict.

Upon investigation, we found out that the trip was organized by Authentic Israel, a travel agency whose website made no effort of acknowledging the existence of Palestine in any capacity whatsoever and had partnerships with Birthright Israel and other Zionist agencies. The trip’s itinerary also only featured one Arab speaker, Khaled Abu Toameh, a reporter who is famously critical of the PLO and American collegiate anti-Zionist activism. In other words, his voice does not represent the majority of Palestinians.

After this research into the trip, we felt, as both Muslims and student leaders, that it was a disrespectful attempt to hide blatant propaganda and Adam reaching out to us was to gain token Muslim support for this propaganda (something that would no doubt help in the trip’s promotion). As a result, we chose to politely decline any endorsement, promotion, or association with the trip.

Zionist propaganda (euphemistically known in Israel as “hasbara”) exists in several forms, including associating the existence of Palestine with antisemitism, connecting Muslim resistance efforts to terrorism and jihad, and, more recently, promoting a positive image of Israel through tourism. In the last few years, several college campuses have fallen victim to predatory tours like the one that was presented to us. These trips prey on university students genuinely interested in learning about geopolitical issues by offering a self-proclaimed cheap, fun, unbiased, and educational once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. The trip provides an elaborate portal into a fantasy world while glorifying Israeli war crimes and silencing Palestinian voices, deceiving hordes of well-intentioned students with a jam-packed itinerary of distracting activities like camel-rides, all while Palestinians are unable to return to their homeland and ruthlessly separated from their families. These trips paint a picture of Israel as a near-utopia, the “only democracy in the Middle East,” the country that “made the desert bloom,” a beacon of peaceful coexistence in a troubled region, and a just fulfillment of Jewish demands for self-determination. Of course, this Potemkin village of Israel has never existed. The reality of an explicitly settler-colonial project which violently expelled over half of the indigenous population and then built a brutal Apartheid system to oppress and dehumanize the remainder is kept well hidden from the participants’ view. Jewish-American journalist Aaron Freedman highlighted the danger of similar trips best in an article published in Jacobin stating, “Birthright Israel pretends the occupation does not exist and manipulates Jewish heritage and identity into support for an apartheid state.”

Once Adam saw our response, he reached out to set up a meeting with us, face to face. We agreed to meet and ended up in a small room in the campus university center with Adam and a student representative from Hillel. The meeting started off cordially with Adam’s friendly attempt at a traditional Arabic greeting followed by some introductions. He began the discussion by telling us how valuable a Muslim endorsement would be to promote this trip and asked us what he could do to earn our support.

We responded firstly by thanking him for the opportunity and then voiced our concerns. We calmly told him that the trip lacked significant representation for the Palestinian cause, that trips like these should not advertise themselves as unbiased, that these trips should not exist while Palestinians are unable to return to their homes, and that we could not morally support such trips.

After some back and forth, Adam realized we would not budge and the conversation took a hard turn. He began to yell at and berate us, calling us ignorant fools who knew nothing, railing about how he never killed a single Palestinian child while in the Israeli military (despite none of us mentioning anything about his time there), and hinting that if we were to escalate anti-Israeli activism on campus, he would push for the dissolution of our respective organizations and our suspension on grounds of antisemitism. Adam then told us that our stubbornness and unwillingness to excuse Israel’s crimes is why there will never be any progress, and people like us are directly to blame for the death of Palestinians (claiming once again without provocation that he never killed anyone).
As Adam’s rage escalated, we decided to excuse ourselves citing an urgent event to attend to. On our way out, the student representative apologized to us profusely claiming that he had never seen Adam in that state and we told him that we appreciated his apologies and would be happy to engage with him and his organization in the future.

Adam’s behavior serves as a microcosm of Zionist behavior and attitudes as a whole. Since Israel’s foundation during the 1948 Nakba, the Israeli government has fed its people a constant barrage of messaging about existential threats, impending genocide, and Arab aggression, while simultaneously pushing a narrative of an Israeli David bravely and miraculously standing up to these Goliath dangers.

This narrative was a lie in 1948, where, in private correspondence, Israel’s first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion acknowledged that the Zionist militias were stronger than the Arab armies and would have no issue taking control of the entirety of Palestine; and it is also a lie now, when neither Palestinians, nor Hezbollah, nor Iran pose much of a threat to Israel– and certainly not an existential one (as Israeli historian Avi Shlaim notes, the nuclear power that is Israel, “poses an existential threat to Iran,” and not the other way around). This inundation with fear-mongering propaganda has produced an Israeli society (and Zionist community in the diaspora) that is, in many cases, paranoid, fearful, and focused on security to the exclusion of all else. Given this pervasive attitude, it is not surprising that many Zionists buy into simplistic narratives and Islamophobic hate or, in Adam’s case, grow vindictive and spiteful when faced with pushback. Their anger and hate is driven by fear.

As people are finally beginning to see the war crimes of the IDF for what they are, Zionists are beginning to express fear more openly. The Israeli military is doubling down on attacks and Israel’s official Twitter account is spiraling. As more people take to the streets to protest the Israeli government, counter protests are happening, and Zionists online are desperately trying to regain control over the narrative. At a protest in Pittsburgh, we watched some counter-protesters come up to a high school girl with a Palestinian flag, taunting her by shouting, “you’re mad because you’re losing!” In response to challenges to a worldview which has been almost universally accepted in the US until quite recently, many Zionists respond, as Adam did, with rage and furious displays of machismo. The mask comes off.

Until Zionists can see Palestinians as human beings, with the right to live, people who only wish to live in their homeland peacefully coexisting with their surroundings; and Islam as a religion of peace not represented by terrorists, peace will never be achieved. Until people like Adam stop letting their fear get the better of them, lashing out instead of engaging in peaceful discourse, taking time to hear the stories of their neighbors instead of only hearing what they want to, the violence will never end. Until Zionists can unlearn their insecurities and prevent reactionary, propaganda-inspired fear from controlling them, Palestine will never know peace.


Editor’s Note: This article was edited after publication to take out a quote anonymously attributed to Khaled Abu Toameh, and a phrase that could be misconstrued as claiming Mr. Abu Toameh served at a spokesperson for the State of Israel.

7 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

In case anyone missed this, the authors posted a website where the ENTIRE book “The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine” by Ilan Pappe can be read free, online:

https://yplus.ps/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Pappe-Ilan-The-Ethnic-Cleansing-of-Palestine.pdf

page 117:

The Palmach units received their orders for Nachson on the very first day of April 1948. The night before, the Consultancy had met at Ben-Gurion’s house to finalise the directives to the units. Their orders were clear: ‘the principal objective of the operation is the destruction of Arab villages … [and] the eviction of the villagers so that they would become an economic liability for the general Arab forces.’

We can expect more and more hardcore Zionists to express anger, and even rage, as the tide continues to turn and control over the narrative slips away from them. Already, the most pro Israel members of our government are increasingly reluctant to come to Israel’s aid following its blatantly criminal behavior, such as what just occurred in the West Bank and Gaza. Even the true believers in the Democratic Party are not so ready to attack members like Ilhan Omar for, basically, telling the truth about Israel’s crimes. Or, if they do, these characters are quick to back away once Nancy Pelosi (of all people) comes to her defense. This would have been inconceivable even a year or two ago, before the social justice movement really took hold!

No, the times they are a changing for the Zionist hasbara machine. We may reach the tipping point on the issue sooner than we thought, not so long ago.

Yes, the mask is off. I too have been accused of not knowing anything, by people who are deliberately ignorant.
People asked Albert Speer – Hitler’s pet architect – what he knew about the Final Solution. He said the real question was, What could he have known if he had asked. Same for the Zionists I know.

Re “Zionist fragility”
Former Senator James Abourezk has revealed that many members of congress privately resent the control that Israel has over them. He wrote, ‘I can tell you from personal experience that, at least in the Congress, the support Israel has in that body is based completely on political fear—fear of defeat by anyone who does not do what Israel wants done. I can also tell you that very few members of Congress—at least when I served there—have any affection for Israel or for its Lobby. What they have is contempt, but it is silenced by fear of being found out exactly how they feel. I’ve heard too many cloakroom conversations in which members of the Senate will voice their bitter feelings about how they’re pushed around by the Lobby to think otherwise. In private one hears the dislike of Israel and the tactics of the Lobby, but not one of them is willing to risk the Lobby’s animosity by making their feelings public.’ http://ifamericaknew.org/us_ints/pg-abourezk.html

Majority of Democrats say US should focus political pressure on Israel | Middle East Eye
“Majority of Democrats say US should focus political pressure on Israel”
“For the first time, the majority of Democrats surveyed by Gallup say US pressure should be focused on Israel, not the Palestinians” Middle East Eye, March 19/21, by Sheren Khalel.
EXCERPT:
“This year’s annual Gallup poll has revealed a shift in sentiment among Americans regarding Israel and the Palestinians, with the majority of Democrats for the first time responding that the US should be putting more pressure on the Israeli government than the Palestinian leadership.

“The poll, published on Friday, said 53 percent of Democrats want US pressure to focus on Israel, compared with the 29 percent that said they want US pressure to be placed on the Palestinians. That figure is up from 2018, when 43 percent of Democrats said they supported putting more pressure on Israel.

“The findings continued among the general population, with the number of all Americans wanting more US pressure on Israel increasing from 27 percent in 2018 to 34 percent in 2021.” 

Fake rage is a standard technique for professional con artists. Some people will back down in its face because of ingrained childhood responses to parental authority. This manipulation is consciously used by professional manipulators. It is entirely fraudulent. More on Zionist fraud in academia is in

“Zionist Academics Take the Side of State Power”
https://consortiumnews.com/2021/06/15/zionist-academics-take-the-side-of-state-power/