Culture

Why anti-Zionism is a core value of congregation Tzedek Chicago

Given the reality of the ongoing injustice at the core of Zionism, Congregation Tzedek Chicago has concluded that it is not enough to describe itself simply as “non-Zionist.”

At our December 2021 meeting, the Tzedek Chicago board voted unanimously to recommend amending our core values statement to state explicitly that anti-Zionism (rather than “non-Zionism”) should be articulated as a core value of our congregation.

Since we knew members would have questions about how all of this came about, we created a set of Q/As, below to give membership the background and rationale for our decision.

As this would obviously be an important, impactful step for our community, we also agreed unanimously that it should be processed, discussed and ultimately put to a membership vote. To this end, we are planning to hold a series of three mini town hall meetings, with the goal of an online membership vote in the spring.

– The Tzedek Chicago Board


Anti-Zionism as a Core Value of Tzedek Chicago: 
Questions and Answers

Why Did Tzedek Chicago originally include “Non-Zionism” as part of our core values?

When our congregation was established in 2015, our founders developed a set of core values to provide the ideological foundation for our congregational life. In our final values statement, we included the following words in the section entitled, “A Judaism Beyond Nationalism:” 

While we appreciate the important role of the land of Israel in Jewish tradition, liturgy and identity, we do not celebrate the fusing of Judaism with political nationalism. We are non-Zionist, openly acknowledging that the creation of an ethnic Jewish nation state in historic Palestine resulted in an injustice against its indigenous people – an injustice that continues to this day. 

From the outset, our founders made a conscious decision to state that Tzedek Chicago would not be a Zionist congregation. Most Jewish congregations in North America are Zionist by default. Among other things, Tzedek Chicago was created to provide a Jewish congregational community for those who did not identify as Zionists – and who did not want to belong to congregations that celebrated Zionism as a necessary aspect of Jewish life.

Why is the board recommending the change from “Non-Zionist” to “Anti-Zionist?”

Zionism, the movement to establish a sovereign Jewish nation state in historic Palestine, is dependent upon the maintenance of a demographic Jewish majority in the land. Since its establishment, Israel has sought to maintain this majority by systematically dispossessing Palestinians from their homes through a variety of means, including military expulsion, home demolition, land expropriation and revocation of residency rights, among others.

It is becoming increasingly difficult to deny the fundamental injustice at the core of Zionism. In its 2021 report, the Israeli human rights group, B’Tselem concluded that Israel is an “apartheid state,” describing it as “a regime of Jewish supremacy from the river to the sea.” In the same year, Human Rights Watch released a similar report stating Israel’s “deprivations are so severe that they amount to the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution.” 

Given the reality of this historic and ongoing injustice, we have concluded that it is not enough to describe ourselves as “non-Zionist.” We believe this neutral term fails to honor the central anti-racist premise that structures of oppression cannot be simply ignored; on the contrary, they must be transformed. As political activist Angela Davis, has famously written, “In a racist society, it is not enough to be non-racist, we must be anti-racist.”

What about the claim that anti-Zionism is antisemitism?

While there are certainly individual anti-Zionists who are antisemites, it is disengenous to claim that opposition to Zionism is fundamentally antisemitic. Judaism (a centuries-old religious peoplehood) is not synonymous with Zionism (a modern nationalist ideology that is not exclusively Jewish). Since the founding of the Zionist movement in the 19th century, there has always been active Jewish opposition to Zionism

While Jewish anti-Zionists are still a minority in the Jewish community today, their numbers have been increasing, particularly among those under 30 years of age. Not coincidentally, we are witnessing increasingly vociferous calls from the Israeli government, Israel advocates and Jewish institutions to label anti-Zionism as antisemitism. There have also been public calls to categorize anti-Zionist Jews as “Un-Jews” and “Jews in name only.” Given the tenor of the current moment, we believe the need for public stances by principled Jewish anti-Zionists is all the more critical. 

 “Anti-Zionist” describes what we oppose – but what are we are positively advocating for?

While we affirm that Tzedek Chicago is an anti-Zionist congregation, that is not all we are. This value is but one aspect of a larger vision we refer to in our core values statement as a “Judaism Beyond Borders.” Central to this vision is an affirmation of the diaspora as the fertile ground from which Jewish spiritual creativity has flourished for centuries. Indeed, Jewish life has historically taken root, adapted and blossomed in many lands throughout the world. At Tzedek Chicago we seek to develop and celebrate a diasporic consciousness that joyfully views the entire world as our homeland.

Moving away from a Judaism that looks to Israel as its fully realized home releases us into rich imaginings of what the World to Come might look like, where it might be, and how we might go about inhabiting it now. This creative windfall can infuse our communal practices, rituals, and liturgy.

We also believe that Jewish diasporic consciousness has the real potential to help us reach a deeper solidarity with those who have been historically colonized and oppressed. As we state in our core values:

We understand that our Jewish historical legacy as a persecuted people bequeaths to us a responsibility to reject the ways of oppression and stand with the most vulnerable members of our society. In our educational programs, celebrations and liturgy, we emphasize the Torah’s repeated teachings to stand with the oppressed and to call out the oppressor.

Does Tzedek Chicago expect every member to personally adhere to this new position?

As is the case with all of our core values, this position is not an ideological “litmus test” for membership at Tzedek Chicago. It is, rather, part of our collective vision as a religious community. We understand that every individual member of our congregation will struggle with these issues and must come to their own personal conclusions. The main question for all of Tzedek’s members is not “do I personally accept every one of these core values?” but rather, “given these values, is this a congregation that I would like to support and to which I would like to belong?”

What will this decision mean for our congregation going forward?

We believe the core value of anti-Zionism will open up many important opportunities for our community. It will guide us in the programs we develop, the Jewish spiritual life we create, the coalitions we join and the public positions we take. In a larger sense, we believe this decision will create space for other Jewish congregations to take a similar stand – to join us in imagining and building a Jewish future beyond Zionism. 

In the end, we are advocating for this congregational decision in the hopes that it may further catalyze Jewish participation in the worldwide movement to dismantle all systems of racism and oppression. May it happen בִּמְהֵרָה בְּיָמֵינוּ – bimheira be’yameinu – soon in our own day.


9 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

1 of 2
Henry Morgenthau Sr., former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey, 1919: “Zionism is the most stupendous fallacy in Jewish history…. The very fervour of my feeling for the oppressed of every race & every land, especially for the Jews, those of my own blood & faith, to whom I am bound by every tender tie, impels me to fight with all the greater force against this scheme, which my intelligence tells me can only lead them deeper into the mire of the past, while it professes to be leading them to the heights. Zionism is… a retrogression into the blackest error, & not progress toward the light.” (Quoted by Frank Epp, Whose Land is Palestine? p. 261)

For the Jewish state, the Holocaust is a tool to be manipulated (972mag.com)
“For the Jewish state, the Holocaust is a tool to be manipulated”
By Orly Noy, November 20, 2020 – 972 Magazine.

https://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/05/21/widening-cracks-zionism
May 21/16
“The Widening Cracks in Zionism”
“Zionism has imposed an ideological orthodoxy that seeks to lock Jews & Western politicians into unquestioning support for whatever Israel does, but more people are beginning to break ranks.”
By Professor Lawrence Davidson
EXCERPT:
“Zionism is an ideological movement that preaches the God-given Jewish right to control & settle all of historical Palestine. Since the founding of Israel in 1948 the Zionists have also claimed that the ‘Jewish State’ represents all of world Jewry, thus self-aware Jews owe allegiance to both Israel & its prevailing Zionist philosophy.
“However, in the last decade or so, that allegiance has been breaking down. In the U.S. a growing ‘disconnect’ has been noted between the outlook & actions of the leaders of major U.S. Jewish organizations (who remain uncritically supportive of Israel) & the increasingly alienated Jewish-American rank-&-file whom, at least up until recently, the leaders claimed to represent. This gap has been repeatedly documented by several sources ranging from, Pew Research Center surveys, to the Jewish Forward newspaper, & the organization of Reform Judaism.(cont’d)

One must understand the difference between “cultural Zionism” and “political Zionism.” Nathaniel Birnbaum, the inventor of the term “Zionism,” simply wanted Jews to view Palestine as a cultural center, to which they might voluntarily make aliyah. He did not contemplate Jews taking over the governing of Palestine, turning it into a “Jewish state.” He was disturbed by the First Zionist Congress in 1897 when “political Zionists” took over the movement, and gradually left the movement, by the end of his life becoming frankly anti-Zionist.

Between 1897 and the late thirties, mainstream Zionism adopted a deceptive strategy of asking for a “cultural center” in Palestine and liberal immigration of Jews making aliyah, but secretly planning for a political takeover, dispossession, discrimination and exclusion of non-Jews from organizations like Histadrudt. By the start of the British Mandate, Palestinians were aware of the hidden agenda and resisted in various ways, and the British made this clear at the start of the Mandate. Britain softened its anti-Palestinian stance somewhat, which drew the ire of Zionist fanatics, but it still tilted toward Zionism by allowing the Haganah to thrive while disarming Palestinian militias. Zev Jabotinsky criticized the hypocrisy and deception, arguing for revision and a frank adoption of political Zionism including exclusion of Palestinians, rather than traditional labor’s policy of pretending empathy for Palestinians while excluding them by stealth. Over the decades, with little to no push-back from the Western empire, Israeli politics and society have gradually moved closer and closer to revisionism internally, though they are still able to hoodwink many in the West into believing the fault is all with recalcitrant Palestinians.

2 of 2
“As characterized by the Jewish Forward the situation is that ordinary American Jews are ‘far more critical of Israel than the Jewish establishment.’ Almost half of the American Jews surveyed by a Pew study in 2013 did not think the Israeli government was making a ‘sincere effort’ to achieve peace with the Palestinians. Almost as many saw Israel’s expanding colonization of the West Bank as counterproductive.”

“Thus, this disconnect is not a sudden or new situation. The numbers of questioning American Jews have continued to grow, and things have only gotten worse for the Zionist leadership. Indeed, just as many young Pew American Jews may be joining pro-peace activist groups as are cheering on AIPAC at its conventions.”

Oh, wow. A congregation where the rabbi wouldn’t lose her job by not supporting Israel right or wrong! Let’s hope there will be others, many others.
Years ago I went to an event at a local synagogue, a panel discussion meant to provide Zionists with arguments in favour of Israel. Judging by the questions, and the answers, the panelists, who were professional Jews, knew what Israel is and does. The people in the audience did not, because they didn’t want to.
BTW, for people who don’t know, Tzedek means Justice.

Before we get into another unproductive discussion about Zionism it might help to state the obvious: talking about “Zionism” is like talking about “Christianity”: which of the 100 flavors are we considering? The God-wants-to-send-gay-people-to-hell party ( https://www.cnn.com/2012/08/03/politics/military-funerals-protests/index.html ) or the God-wants-you-to-smoke-pot faction? ( https://www.christianpost.com/news/xxxchurch-pastor-craig-gross-promotes-christian-cannabis-says-weed-makes-it-easier-to-worship.html )

One takeaway from Patrick Tyler’s “Fortress Israel : The Inside Story of the Military Elite Who Run The Country–And Why They Can’t Make Peace” is that in Israel’s early days there were Zionist peaceniks (Moshe Sharett) and Zionist-get-rid-of-the-Arabs (Moshe Dayan), and the Zionist-get-rid-of-the-Arabs group took over from the mid 1950s to today.