Israel’s onslaught on Gaza last week was shocking to many of us. It was unprovoked by any Palestinian attack and comprised three days of strikes on a captive, fenced-in population. Those strikes were aimed at the leadership of a militant group, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and killed and injured many children.
“The escalation took a severe toll on the civilian population,” the U.N.’s special coordinator stated. “An orgy of violence,” Middle East Eye called it. “The attacks by Israel on Gaza are cruel and heartbreaking,” Jonathan Kuttab of Friends of Sabeel North America wrote. “In three short days, the Israeli military managed to rain death and destruction on Gaza, assassinating another Islamic Jihad leader, killing 49 Palestinians (including 17 children), and wounding 460 others. Meanwhile, it suffered no casualties itself aside from a few lightly wounded by shrapnel.”
This understanding of the attack is widespread in social media and in the Palestinian solidarity community. We have all seen the photos of Palestinian children killed by the assault. And it is obvious that one motive for the attack was the need of the new Israeli prime minister— a former TV host who had a desk job in the army– to demonstrate that he too can mete out violence to Palestinians.
That understanding has largely escaped the mainstream press. Though NPR did a report on the “harrowing stories” of children trapped in the Strip as the bombs fell, The New York Times has avoided the political angle and is yet to put the faces of the Palestinian children killed on its front page, as it did for 66 children in May 2021.
Indeed, Israelis have been gloating over the success of the attack. “Israel enjoyed 55 hours of almost side-to-side international legitimacy,” Avital Leibovich of the American Jewish Committee crowed in a briefing aimed at American Jews. She said the world was too distracted by other news, including economic issues in the U.S., to pay much attention to Gaza. “The attention of the media which at the end of the day is the tool that allocates information to the public, to the world, was not in Israel, was not in Gaza,” she said.
So much for the world. But what about Israel’s advocates who follow the issue as closely as we do and were put in the position of defending an unprovoked attack that killed children. How did they justify it?
Many ignored the facts. “We stand alongside #Israel in its right to self-defense against the direct threats to Israeli civilians posed by Palestinian Islamic Jihad,” the ADL said. The ADL’s ceo, Jonathan Greenblatt also ignored the fact that the attack was unprovoked: “As hundreds of rockets have rained down on Israeli civilians for the past 48+ hours, praying a cease fire will be reached soon and bring quiet and safety to all.” J Street’s statement also rationalized the onslaught by blaming PIJ–“Israel has a right to defend itself against a terrorist organization that has threatened Israeli lives.”
Others adopted a clinical approach to the killing of children. Michael Koplow at the Israel Policy Forum titled his post-mortem, “Proof of concept for a better Gaza policy,” and congratulated Israel on the attack without even saying how many children had been killed.
“[I]t is safe to say that it stands as one of Israel’s most successful confrontations in Gaza in the past 15 years. The IDF completed its military objectives of striking Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s top leadership and rocket facilities while limiting Palestinian civilian casualties, no Israeli civilians were killed despite over 1100 rockets fired by PIJ… It was a demonstration of impressive Israeli military and intelligence capabilities and responsible political decisions.”
“Essentially a bloodless praising of the operation that could have been written by a general or politician, all the while ignoring the moral context, which is horrific,” summarizes Robert Herbst.
Avital Leibovich’s briefing to the American Jewish Committee also said the attack was a giant win. Her justification of the preemptive nature of the attack sounded distant from Palestinian reality– like a Hollywood script, or an opinion on Facebook:
[T]he Palestinian Islamic Jihad actually planned some kind of deadly terror attack against Israeli targets… According to the Israeli intelligence, we understand that the Palestinian Islamic Jihad wanted to use a precise missile… in order to target probably a bus of people, maybe a bus of soldiers, maybe a bus of workers in the area, or anything of that sort, and that’s why Israel decided … to preemptively strike the PIJ and prevent this attack, and by doing so by the way also restraining other terror organizations in Gaza…
Leibovich was more lurid when she detailed Israeli fears of abduction of its citizens by Gaza militants.
One of the challenges we face in Israel is the issue of abduction. Those tunnels [from inside Gaza to the border]… their operational goal was to send a commando unit… to the Israeli side of the border, inside a village, and try to kidnap as many people as possible, in order then to kill them or negotiate for them, or both…”
One advocate was honest about the unprovoked nature of the attack. Daniel Gordis, an American emigre to Israel, wrote that it was right that Israel struck first because of the Jewish people’s history of sieges in which they have been expelled from the land.
Gordis said that it was a great thing that Israel attacked because of “what happened thousands of years ago” in Jewish history.
Those ancient sieges spelled disaster for the Jewish people. The destruction of the First Temple led almost immediately to a massive exile of the Jews from the Land of Israel. Never again, since that exile, has a plurality of the Jewish people lived in the Land of Israel..
Gordis said that Jewish critics of the attack in the United States, including IfNotNow and Jewish Voice for Peace, are just sanctifying Jewish “victimhood.” Because if Israel doesn’t kill, Gordis said, Jews will be thrown off of walls as in ancient times or consigned to gas chambers.
For what would constitute moral Jewish action in the eyes of today’s worshippers of victimhood? Likely nothing less than Jews being tossed over the walls…
Because Israelis, even on the left, take Islamic Jihad’s warnings seriously. As a friend of mine commonly says to me, quoting his father who survived Auschwitz, “If you’re a Jew and your enemy threatens to kill you, believe him.”
Again, I don’t think that Gordis is reflecting the reality of the Israel/Palestine conflict of today when he invokes the Second Temple and the Holocaust. One side has all the firepower. The numbers of dead are very imbalanced.
Indeed, Israel has killed scores of Palestinian children since the beginning of this year. That is the terrible fact that all of these advocates must either paper over or seek to rationalize.
In my opinion the issue of why Hamas was restrained is under-analyzed in the media. From Koplow’s statement above:
https://israelpolicyforum.org/2022/08/11/proof-of-concept-for-a-better-gaza-policy/
“Hamas’ absence was not a coincidence…The policy…was to improve the situation for ordinary Palestinians in Gaza as a way of raising the stakes for Hamas. When the economy in Gaza is effectively non-existent and electricity is only available for four hours a day, Hamas has nothing to lose by shooting rockets into Israel and Palestinians in Gaza have no incentive to do anything other than encourage violent and armed resistance against Israel. Alongside the moral imperative of improving the lives of Gaza’s residents, the theory is that opening up Gaza for greater freedom of movement and more economic opportunity puts Hamas in a more difficult situation when deciding whether to escalate with Israel, since it now risks rolling back tangible gains for Gaza’s residents and in turn its own standing.”
So give Hamas something to lose – a seaport and an airport.
1 of 2
When Will the West Publicly Endorse the Right of the Palestinians to Defend Themselves? – Palestine Chronicle
By Ilan Pappe, August 11/22
EXCERPT:
“The last Israeli brutal assault on the Gaza Strip exposed once more the hypocritical & immoral response of the West to the ongoing genocidal policies of Israel in the occupied territories. The continuation of the callous policies & the Western governments’ responses, in particular the American & British ones, can naturally lead to desperation & paralysis.
“However, despair & inaction are a luxury Palestinians under apartheid, siege & occupation cannot afford; therefore, the solidarity movement as well should do its best not to give in to a sense of helplessness of hopelessness. It is important to record the continued insincerity of the West, as it transpired once more this time, condemn this duplicity & counter it by exposing the fabrications & distortions on which it is based.
“The American President, the State Department, & the American envoy to the United Nations ‘supported Israel’s right to defend itself’ in reaction to the Israeli assault as did the British foreign secretary, who will probably be the next prime minister in September. It is quite incredible to hear these statements: at a time when every major human & civil rights organization on the globe defined Israel as an apartheid state, the Western political elites chose to hail its right to self-defense.
“We should not tire & remind the world that the people who have the right to defend themselves are the Palestinians & that they possess very limited means to do so, whether by armed struggle or by appealing to international law & institutions. In many cases, they were unable to defend themselves, neither in Gaza this month, nor anywhere else in historical Palestine since 1948. When they do succeed in doing so, they are accused of being terrorists.” (cont’d)
2 of 2
“The Western governments seem to care very little for the Palestinian right to life, dignity, & property. The UN committed to doing so in Resolution 181 of November 29, 1947, & stood by when all these rights were violated during the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Since then, & in particular since 1967, none of the Western governments ever attempted to protect the Palestinians, when the Israeli army shot, killed or wounded them – with weapons supplied by the West or developed with its help. It also did nothing when their houses were demolished, their livelihood destroyed or when they were ethnically cleansed.
“We can look at July 2022 alone and record some of the Palestinian victims whose right to self-defense has not been recognized by the President of the USA or the Foreign Minister of Britain. These politicians were silent when, during this month, Saadia Faragallah-Mattar, a 64-year-old mother of 8 and a grandmother of 28, died in the Damon jail, where she had already spent 6 months detained without trial. No one defended or acknowledged the right to life, in this very same month, of Amjad Abu Aliya, a 16-year-old boy who was shot by Israeli soldiers.
“The list of those murdered just this month is long. It includes Nabil Gahnem, 53 years old, who tried to return home safely from working in Israel and was shot dead by Israeli soldiers last July, and Taher Khalil Mohammad Maslat, a 16-year-old boy shot on his way to school by Israeli snipers who aimed at him from a distance of 100 meters and killed him. Odeh Mahmoud Odeh was shot dead in July, in al-Midya, a village near Ramallah, in a week that also saw the killing of Ayman Mahmoud Muhsein, aged 29, a father of 3 and a political prisoner for 3 years, who was killed in the Dheisheh camp near Bethlehem, and Bilal Awad Qabha, aged 24, killed in Yabad.”
Apparently, only the Israeli’s have anything even close to the “right to defend themselves” What a pile of crap. They follow the US in targeting people they want to assassinate. Why is it that the IDF and others can kill Palestinians with impunity? Do the Palestinians have no rights whatsoever? The US Congress can apparently be totally bought by the Israeli government through AIPAC. It is definitely “all about the Benjamins” as congress and the rest care more about getting re-elected than anything else. I only mention this because Israel thinks that they control the US.
Maybe if Israel lifted the Gaza blockade, allowed fishing and establishing of airports and seaports those in Gaza would no longer support groups that are anti Israel. That will never happen of course until the world recognizes the policies of Israel that are racist, anti Arab, and generally live in the hope that all Palestinians can be purged from the land that Israel claims. Israel tried in 1948 but did not entirely succeed. Of course, the Canaanites are the holders of all the land, not the Jews. They are the true people that the Palestinians evolved from.
Perhaps one day the rest of the world will recognize that Israel has no claims the the land, is entirely a racist society, and practices apartheid as a governmental policy, there will be some change.
Maybe then we will all unite against apartheid and have equal rights for all in that area of the Middle East.
Fat chance. Israel will nuke the world before they will give the Palestinians rights.
Israel’s behaviour is the best weapon that we anti-Zionists have.