Gorenberg vs. Clinton on an Undivided Jerusalem

by Philip Weiss on October 8, 2007 · 10 comments

Ahead of news reports that Israel is moving the right direction on Jerusalem, Gershom Gorenberg has penned a moving letter to Hillary Clinton, urging her to abandon her effort to capture Jewish support by calling for an "undivided Jerusalem." Americans of all faiths should join this appeal and help to establish Jerusalem as a world city…

Related posts:

  1. Both Party Platforms Say ‘Undivided’ Jerusalem
  2. Obama’s ‘Undivided Jerusalem’ Line Still Resonates
  3. How Bad Ideas (Like an Undivided Jerusalem) Get Good Money
  4. Jewish Division: RJC Blasts Obama Over Dividing Jerusalem
  5. Obama’s at the Western Wall, But Our Journalists Can’t Talk About the Jerusalem Issue and the Lobby

{ 10 comments }

1 Allahstein October 8, 2007 at 10:27 am

Report: Israel, PA agree Jordanian control of Temple Mount

London-based Palestinian daily quotes Abbas aide as saying, Israel and Palestinians have agreed to transfer control of parts of Old City in Jerusalem to Jordan as part of future peace agreement

Israel and the Palestinians have agreed that the Temple Mount as well as other parts of the Old City in Jerusalem will be under Jordanian control as part of a future peace deal, a Palestinian daily reported on Monday.
The London-based al-Quds al-Arabi reported that President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert reached the agreement during recent talks in Jerusalem. Under the arrangement, the Old City's Arab residents will be granted Jordanian citizenship.

The newspaper did not say whether Israel would keep control of Jewish holy sites and neighborhoods in the Old City.

The arrangement will make the Jordanian monarchy a guardian of holy Muslim shrines in Jerusalem.

The plan's details and implementation will be supervised by Jordan, Israel, Egypt, the Palestinian Authority and the United Nations, the newspaper said.

The report comes a day after remarks by Vice Premier Haim Ramon that Abbas and Olmert will discuss the status of Jerusalem during the US-sponsored talks in November.

Ramon said it was in Israel's interest to hand over control of Jerusalem's Arab Neighborhoods to the Palestinian Authority.

A Palestinian official told Ynet it was agreed in principle that the neighborhoods of Shuafat, Wadi Jos, Beit Hanina, Ras el-Amoud and Jabal Mukaber would be transferred to PA control.

He added that progress was also made regarding the excavations at the Temple Mount. The Palestinians have recently claimed that Israel is attempting to build a synagogue under the complex.

The official said that under a future deal Israel would be responsible for security at the Temple Mount while the Palestinians would have sovereignty over the area. In addition, Israel agreed not to conduct any archeological digs at the complex.

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's office denied al-Quds al-Arabi's report, saying "no agreement has been reached."

Ali Waked contributed to the report

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3457435,00.html

2 Allahstein October 8, 2007 at 10:32 am

Phil – Which jewish lobby is responsibile for this? We know that some American Jews have been advocating for this type of policy for years. Is this yet another example of Jewish power? Liberal Jewish power?

I noticed that the Jewish Lobby in Cleveland was having their way with MLB until all those rich Jews in NY caught wind of it and started flexing their muscles. Not sure which Jewish lobby will be more powerful, but one thing I do know – whichever city's team is not battling the Sox is going to be real angry at some rich Jews.

3 David Seaton October 8, 2007 at 2:55 pm

Maybe Jerusalem is the wedge to split the Lobby. It will also smoke out the politicians for sure.

4 Allahstein October 8, 2007 at 4:18 pm

David – I think the "Lobby" is already split. If you were to poll all American Jews I think you would find that at least half would be perfectly fine with Israel splitting Jerusalem if it meant peace in the region.

Now, as for the evangelicals, I'm not sure.

5 Alex Chaihorsky October 8, 2007 at 5:01 pm

The issue of Jerusalem and the legality of anything done there is far beyond my expertise. One thing I know, though.

Walking the streets of Jerusalem at comparatively peaceful times 10 years ago was a mixed experience for me. The city is middle-eastern to its core. It is the gates to the mystical East, the outpost of the desert birthplace of monotheism. It seem to exist in another dimension. It silently hovers between the heavens and earth.
The mix of faces, languages, rhythms and attitudes does not violate the almost palpable presence of the slow rolling of the river of history and unreal airness of the place. What violates it is the insulting omnipresence of armed patrols of young IDF soldiers.
Disrespectful, rude, with Kiplingesque master-race grins on their teenage faces, ready and eager to project their order on an unarmed crowd that is mostly the age of their parents is simultaneously disgustingly ominous and helplessly childish. Like warts on a healthy body they do not affect your perception of the whole, but rather make you want to call a surgeon. The fact that the government in Tel Aviv made a decision at some point after 1967 to patrol Jerusalem by armed soldiers rather than equally armed police is very revealing of Israeli establishment deep instinctive understanding that they are really not the owners, but just the occupiers of it.

This time or another, this century or the next, but this city will return to its soul one day with all the communities living in a healthy dynamic and competitive mix with each other under the laisse-faire rule of Turkish republic or Jordanian monarchs, with large-bellied, bushy-mustached older policemen armed with awkward sabres rather than guns passing their time lazily seeping coffee outside silversmiths shops.
And in itself, the very quest of Euro-Galician Jewry to conquer the land of Zion and the birthplace of Judaism and thus establish themselves as leaders of Jewish race is as naive, childish and hopeless as these boorish soldiers-children imagining that they own this eternal place.
Both will return to their true meaning and their true Owner, who will, one day, give it to someone else again.
And the river of history will follow the will of its Creator. And the short, stormy rule of socialist Jewish sect will slowly fade away like the rings from a stone thrown in in its glassy waters.

6 Dude October 8, 2007 at 5:25 pm

Alex likes to hear himself talk.

Whatever.

Just share the damn city.

Fat guy with the mustache and sabre gets the East side and the kid with the uzi gets the other side.

7 David October 8, 2007 at 9:27 pm

——————————————————————————
An interesting debate from back in May between Uri Avnery and Ilan Pappe on the desirability/possibility of a one-state solution–
http://toibillboard.info/Transcript_eng_improved.mht

8 Alex Chaihorsky October 9, 2007 at 6:58 am

Dude,

Holy cities (which you call the "damn ones") are not some plastic toys or candy bars to be "shared" with other kids in a sandbox. You are missing the point. The kid with an Uzi is an abomination. The fact that he is Jewish makes it a hundredfold worse. It took ignorant Ashkenazi Zionists two whole generations to understand that. And finally, they are starting to get it. Jerusalem needs to be de-occupied, Jewish sites returned to the oldest Jewish community of the world in Jerusalem and things slowly go to pre-1967.
And by the way, given the chance, the kid with the Uzi, he would rather "patrol" Miami.

9 MM October 9, 2007 at 12:08 pm

Hear hear, Alex…

I don't have any religious perspective on this, nor any belief in "holy lands."

I think a kid patrolling anything with an Uzi is an abomination, period.

The arms industry and black market weapons profiteering is an abomination, period.

Division of human beings into two classes by ethnicity, and deliberate control of populations by ethnicity, is an abomination, period.

I wonder if I'm alone wondering why anyone would consider any of this situation somehow sacred. That religion is one of the pretexts involved is just deeply ironic.

10 Alex Chaihorsky October 9, 2007 at 1:04 pm

MM: some notes on your points:

1. >> I don't have any religious perspective on this, nor any belief in "holy lands."

Which is fine, really. The problem is that 90% of people who live THERE, do. You may not believe in anything, but not acknowledging the special case of Jerusalem because you happen to be an atheist is denying facts. You do believe in facts, don't you?

2. Arms industries were always the most profitable since the times they invented a club. You know why? Because without arms the biggest guy has no limits. It is the possibility that a little guy would pull the trigger on that tiny black thingy and it will propel 9 grams of lead through the bully's head that stops him. Nothing else.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: From Bellow to Roth to ‘Never Again,’ the Lobby Has Served Jewish Psychic Needs

Next post: Harvard Prof Says Google Cancelled His Talk on Israel Lobby