This AP story bears great news, that a ceasefire might be accepted by Israel and Hamas. Notice that the key figures are Sarkozy and Turkey. While Condi Rice attacks Hamas. Also note the horrifying figures: 670 dead, more than 300 of them civilians. No wonder the curve on this one is sharper than Lebanon '06.
-
-
- South African artists, intellectuals and gov’t ministers take steps to … 2
- Aharon Appelfeld’s rage at the German language (and Arendt’s need … 24
- Feeling the hate in Long Island 55
- The awakening: Missouri paper runs a Jew’s call for equal … 19
- Monumental Dutch exhibit: Zionism built ‘a house, a cage, a … 24
- ‘King Bibi’ is ready for his close up, and ‘Time’ … 17
- A tale of two festivals 2
- Kristol: ‘I don’t see it as a huge problem’ 33
-
- Congressman Joe Pitts: ‘It is incumbent on Ariel Sharon and … 4478
- BDS victory: South Africa strips Ahava’s ‘made in Israel’ label 686
- ‘New York Review of Books’ calls it ‘apartheid’ and prepares … 556
- Neverending Nakba: Israel breaks lull, attacks Gazan farmers 398
- Thousands march across the West Bank in support of the … 316
- Protests on behalf of prisoners sweep the West Bank 284
- Thaer Halahleh, dying, tells the daughter he’s never seen why … 235
- International attention must be paid to the Palestinian nonviolent movement 209
-
- On the sidewalk in Hamburg– ‘Hier wohnte’ 285
- Liberal Zionists are afraid their parents will reject them if … 196
- WaPo’s Walter Pincus says US is ‘going above and beyond … 77
- Walzer says Jews were on the left because the left … 75
- Killing Without Consequence: New campaign challenges Israeli impunity 73
- International attention must be paid to the Palestinian nonviolent movement 69
- More ‘magnet than a mallet’: RAND Corporation warns against striking … 68
- U. of Haifa stops Nakba commemoration, as prof writes hate … 66
-
Recent Comments
click link to see last 100 comments- Monumental Dutch exhibit: Zionism built ‘a house, a cage, a UN shelter… a zoo’ (24)
- Sumud: libra ~ I’m going to fill out your reference for those not so familiar with 20th c. art history: Wiki /...
- Aharon Appelfeld’s rage at the German language (and Arendt’s need for it) (24)
- Feeling the hate in Long Island (55)
- Kristol: ‘I don’t see it as a huge problem’ (33)
- piotr: Gilad Atzmon perhaps never hurt a fly, but he proudly published a lengthy somewhat ignorant diatribe against...
- The awakening: Missouri paper runs a Jew’s call for equal rights for all (19)
- Hostage: The one disciplined force that actually posed a threat to the Zionist takeover was the British-led Arab...
- WaPo’s Walter Pincus says US is ‘going above and beyond for Israel’ (78)
- Hostage: I dismiss it as merely a label of convenience rather than a policy statement. Fred the ICJ has handled cases...
- International attention must be paid to the Palestinian nonviolent movement (70)
- giladg: British Mandated Palestine was controlled by who Talkback? There is a clue to the answer in my question.
- Monumental Dutch exhibit: Zionism built ‘a house, a cage, a UN shelter… a zoo’ (24)
Our Writers
- Philip Weiss
- Adam Horowitz
- Today in Palestine
- Annie Robbins
- Alex Kane
- Kate
- Alice Rothchild
- Ahmed Moor
Blogroll
US & Israel myopia: Israel Rules Rule
link to salon.com
Many have doubts about Sarkozy's neocon tendencies, and still do. But he unquestionably has shown leadership in the Gaza crisis.
By contrast, the mighty but pitiful Anglo-American alliance has its head so far up Israel's ass that it can't see its way out of a paper bag. Tony Blair will have to cut short his feckless tete-a-tetes with the Israeli alliance to accept an award from George Bush next Tuesday.
In other non-news …
Saree Makdisi eloquently discusses the unimaginable heartlessness of Zionism in today's Counterpunch. Many other heart-rending articles appear there and at antiwar.com today.
These are terrible timess, and, yes, Phil's right: we're all being tested.
'Israel’s disregard for Palestinian life in Gaza today is, in short, a direct extension of its disregard for Palestinian life since 1948, and what is happening in Gaza today is the continuation of what happened six decades ago. Eighty percent of the people crammed into Gaza’s hovels and shanties are refugees or the descendants of refugees that armed Zionist gangs, which eventually coalesced into the infant Israeli army, terrorized from their homes elsewhere in southwestern Palestine in 1948. They have been herded, penned, and slaughtered by a remorseless power that clearly regards them as subhuman. If you think I’m stretching the point, I’m not. Listen to the words of Professor Arnon Sofer, the government consultant who did so much to help plan the isolation and imprisonment of Gaza, in a interview with the Jerusalem Post in 2004:
“When 2.5 million people live in a closed-off Gaza, it’s going to be a human catastrophe,” Sofer predicted. “Those people will become EVEN BIGGER ANIMALS THAN THEY ARE TODAY, with the aid of an insane fundamentalist Islam.
The pressure on the border is going to be awful. It’s going to be a terrible war. So, if we want to remain alive, we will have to KILL AND KILL AND KILL. All day, every day.”
Sofer admitted only one worry with all the killing, which will, he says, be the necessary outcome of a policy that he himself helped to invent. “The only thing that concerns me,” he says, “is how to ensure that the boys and men who are going to have to do the killing will be able to return home to their families and be NORMAL human beings.”
[SK'S CAPS]
Meticulously and clinically thought through even before the first rocket from Gaza claimed a life inside Israel, the slaughter in Gaza today has nothing to do with rockets or with Hamas. As Sofer himself explains, it is the purest and most distilled expression of Zionist ideology. “Unilateral separation doesn’t guarantee ‘peace,’” Sofer says in that same interview; “it guarantees a Zionist-Jewish state with an overwhelming majority of Jews.”
And that—taken right from the horse’s mouth—is what the slaughter of innocents in Gaza is fundamentally about: the people being killed today are the ones for whom there is no room in the Zionist vision of the state. They are regarded as an excess population. Not even Malthus thought that a redundant population should just be lined up and shot, or bombed into the ground. But, clearly, times have changed since 1798.
This inhuman madness will end only with the end of the violent ideology that spawned it—when those who are committed to the project of creating and maintaining a religiously and ethnically exclusivist state in what has always been a culturally and religiously heterogeneous land finally relent and accept the inevitable: that they have failed.
Saree Makdisi is a professor of English and comparative literature at UCLA and the author of Palestine Inside Out: An Everyday Occupation.
link to counterpunch.org
Here's another great expose on anti-Palestinian and Pro-Israeli press bias:
The Trauma Vortex: Israel's Monopoly on Psychological Suffering
http://www.counterpunch.org/fernandez01072009.html
And, yes, Anonn, Kamiya's article in Salon today is superb; Anti-war.com calls it "Blinded to Israel's Faults."
Robert Scheer, Why Do So Few Speak Up for Gaza?
1. decries the Western media's acceptance of being barred from Gaza
2. criticizes the US indifference to Palestinian suffering
3.debunks the ridiculously exaggerated existential crises Israel says it always faces
4. exposes the hypocrisy of refusing to negotiate with Hamas, when so many current Israeli politicians Have been terrorists.
5. wonders when we'll again have leaders like Einstein, who refuse to deal with fascists.
link to truthdig.com
Phillipe Sands is now on Terry Gross's NPR Fresh Air discussing the possibility that US leaders face the possibility of war crimes investigations:
the usual Zionists and then the sadists:
Addington, Feith, Wolfowitz, Yoo–less likelihood for Cheney, Sands says.
“Unilateral separation doesn’t guarantee ‘peace,’” Sofer says in that same interview; “it guarantees a Zionist-Jewish state with an overwhelming majority of Jews.”
The Arab peace initiative, which gives Israel an effective veto over the right of return, also guarantees a Zionist-Jewish state with an overwhelming majority of Jews. It also offers regional normalization.
I know it would mean settling for the 1967 borders instead of Eretz Israel, but wouldn't that be a better strategy for preserving a Jewish super-majority than just ghettoizing and killing more and more Arabs and Muslims? Sooner rather than later, whether Israel wills it or not, Iran and its leading Arab regional rivals will be sporting nukes. And then having no policy except ever-escalating violence won't look smart at all.