Could you look at that piece in the ‘Times’ on the soldier who lost all his limbs?

I couldn’t read or look at the story in the NYT yesterday about the soldier who lost his arms and legs in Iraq. Too painful; and too sharp a reminder of the fact that the fools who dreamed this up have no "skin in the game," as they say in Hollywood. If their children were at risk for this sort of future, they wouldn’t be pushing war with Iran. Steve Walt read the piece and lets loose:

I can’t help but wonder what George Bush, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, William Kristol, James Woolsey, and Doug Feith will think when they read about the damage done to Specialist [Brendan] Marrocco’s life and his family? Do they feel a secret shame, which they are too proud or afraid to voice? Do they have any regrets for the pain that they have caused him? Do they still believe they were right, even though so many Iraqi and American lives have been shattered, and Iraq is still a wreck of a country? Or do they simply turn the page without reflecting on the consequences of their actions, and hope that the rest of us will forget the role they played?…

[W]e went to war on March 19, 2003 because a narrow clique of neo-conservatives dreamed up a bizarre scheme to "transform" the Middle East by spreading democracy across the region at the end of a rifle barrel, and eventually managed to sell that idea to a naïve and gullible president. We went to war because the Bush administration and its friends in the media and Congress deceived us about the dangers Iraq posed, and because they misled us about how easy it would be to win a decisive victory and exit Iraq. We went to war because the mainstream media, which is heavily into cultivating favor with influential policymakers, hardly ever asked our leaders hard questions about the case for war.

9 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest