Activists respond to Sodastream’s defense of profiting off the occupation

The following statement was just released by Stop Sodastream – Italy:
 
The Stop Sodastream campaign received a response from Sodastream Italy, via the public relations agency Edelman, to the letter signed by over 1100 individuals and 30 groups calling on retailers and advertisers to terminate relations with the Israeli company due to its violations of international law.
 
sodastream
Soda Stream’s main factory in the Mishor Adumim industrial park,
located in the West Bank. (Photo: Esti Tsal/Who Profits)
We consider the points raised by Sodastream completely irrelevant as they fail to address the central question of violations of human rights and international law and complicity with the Israeli occupation of the occupied Palestinian territories.
 
We would, nonetheless, like to go through, point by point, the statements made by Sodastream to demonstrate the basis for our campaign.
 
1. “SodaStream is headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel, and manufactures its products in 12 production plants distributed in many countries, including factories in China (2), Germany, Sweden, New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, Netherlands, the US and two in Israel, one of which is Mishor Adumim … “
 
Even if there were hundreds of “production facilities” all over the world, it would not change the fact that the factory in Mishor Adumim is built on land stolen from the Palestinians and thus violates human rights and international law.
 
In any event, Sodastream’s annual report clearly demonstrates that the factory in Mishor Adumim is also the company’s main production facilities:
 
  • At 15,256 m2, the plant is four times larger than the headquarters in Tel Aviv, and eight times that of the other Israeli plant at Ashkelon, which produces only flavors for soft drinks.
  • The plant in China produces only “certain components”.
  • The “production facilities” in Germany, Sweden, New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, the Netherlands and the USA are mere sales and marketing offices and refill stations for CO2 cylinders.

Source: Sodastream International Ltd. Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010, “Manufacturing and Production,” p. 37 and “Facilities,” p. 40.

 2. “… where approximately 160 Palestinians receive full social and health services in accordance with, and exceeding, Israeli law, including pension contributions and insurance. Labor law in Israel requires an employer to pay wages and contributions 4 times higher than those required by the Palestinian Authority. If you consider that, on average, each employee is responsible for 10 Palestinian dependents, considering the rate of unemployment in the Palestinian Authority (estimated at 30%), the company provides food and shelter to 1,600 people. In addition, SodaStream also provides benefits that include: daily hot meals, clothing, transportation and overtime pay for up to 200% as required by Israeli law. “
 
The fact that a company such as SodaStream, which profits from the Israeli occupation regime, considers itself a benefactor of the Palestinians is downright bizarre. Even if working conditions for the Palestinians at the Mishor Adumim factory were as described (something that has been proven false in the past by the Israeli organization Kav LaOved), the fact remains that, as subjects an occupation regime, these workers do not enjoy civil rights (including the right of workers to organize) and are under constant threat of having their permits to work in the settlement revoked by the company at any moment.
 
Palestinian workers often have no choice but to work in the settlements, with high unemployment rates that are a direct result of the Israeli occupation. The 2011 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development report explicitly links the decline in Palestinian agricultural and industrial sectors and the dire humanitarian conditions with Israeli government policies, in particular the confiscation of land and natural resources, restrictions on movement of people and goods, and isolation from international markets. Only a colonial mindset could claim to provide jobs to the very same people whose land and freedom have been stolen.
 
Sources:
 
3. “Among the 700 employees at the Mishor Adumim factory are Jews, Palestinians, Christians, Russians, Ethiopians, Bedouins, and Americans. In SodaStream’s view, this is a splendid example of peaceful coexistence that will lead to economic prosperity on which everyone benefits. The company regularly celebrates the holidays of all and has fostered cultural exchange.”
 
To speak of “peaceful coexistence” between people who do not have equal rights and equal social, economic and political opportunities is absurd. Among Sodastream employees, there is a marked difference between the conditions of the occupiers and those who suffer under occupation. For example, just as in Apartheid South Africa the black majority was allowed to enter areas reserved for whites only in order to work, so do the Palestinians depend on the occupying power for work permits.
 
Furthermore, the Jahalin Bedouin, who had already been driven from their lands in the Negev in the 1950s, were then expelled from the very area where the Sodastream has its factory.
 
Sources:
- Human Rights Watch, Separate and Unequal, “Jahalin Bedouin and Ma’ale Adumim”
 
4. “As you know, Sodastream recently decided not to expand the factory at Mishor Adumim, but rather to build one inside the Green Line. The construction is already underway, as decided by the Board of Directors.”
 
Committing to not to expand an illegal activity, which according to the company website, Sodastream has been carrying out since 1996, counts for very little. The fact remains that the main production facilities are located in an illegal Israeli settlement in violation of international law.
 
Source: Sodastream web site, History of the Sodastream Group
 
5. “SodaStream does not currently benefit from low rents and could rent other facilities in the uncontested territories of Israel for much less. The same applies to incentives, the company enjoys the same tax incentives as any other industrial area of Israel, regardless of whether it is located in the disputed territories or not.”
 
Sodastream’s annual report lists among its “risk factors” the possibility, due to negative publicity and boycotts, of having “to transfer a significant portion of manufacturing activities to a location outside of the West Bank” that would “limit certain of the tax benefits for which we are currently eligible”.
 
In fact, according to the web site for the Mishor Adomim Industrial Park, it is designated as “Development Zone ‘A’”, which enjoys the highest tax incentives from the Israeli state.
 
And finally, the Palestinian territories are occupied, not “disputed”, as recognized by the International Court of Justice, the International Committee of the Red Cross and the Conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention, among others.
 
Sources:
- Adumim Industrial Park, Business Benefits
 
6. “With regards to Coop Sweden, yes it is true that on July 19 they decided to suspend sales of these products, however it is also true that, after a brief investigation, they then decided to put them back on the shelves.”
 
Swedish activists inform us that COOP Sweden claims to have the results of an investigation that justify, in their view, the marketing of Sodastream products. COOP Sweden has refused, however, to share the report with the Swedish activists. If Sodastream would like to provide us with the report, we would be happy to comment on it.
 
7. “SodaStream is also under tight control by the Office for Environmental Protection of Israel, leading to surprise inspections, and the company adheres to the highest environmental standards.”
 
It is well known that Israeli and international companies consider Israeli laws on environmental protection inapplicable with regard to factories in the occupied West Bank. According to 2009 report by the Israeli organization B’Tselem, Israel does not enforce environmental laws in the settlements and industrial areas in the occupied West Bank.
 
As for surprise inspections, according to Bloomberg Businessweek and the Corporate Watch website, the Sodastream Factory in Mishor Adumim is “the most heavily protected in the area, with multilevel electric fencing protecting its perimeters and cameras monitoring everything going on outside of them.”
 
Sources:
- Bloomberg Businessweek, “EU Eyes Exports from Israeli Settlements
 
8. “Following the publication of false reports, the company also decided to host visits and inspections, in particular social audits, including the internationally accepted BSCI (Business Social Compliance Initiative) audit, with the conclusion that they no corrective actions are necessary.”
 
Clearly, an auditing organization that certifies a factory located in the occupied Palestinian territories has no credibility whatsoever.
 
The Stop Sodastream campaign will continue to challenge the deceptions of Sodastream, organizing initiatives to reveal the truth that the company wants to hides and promoting a boycott of its products.

About Adam Horowitz

Adam Horowitz is Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.
Posted in Activism, BDS, Israel/Palestine, Occupation

{ 15 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. patm says:

    Thanks for bringing this cogent response of the Italian Stop Sodastream BDS campaign to our attention, Adam.

    In following your links, I learned about “Carmel Agrexco (or in short Agrexco) which, according to wiki, was established in 1956 and is Israel’s largest exporter of agricultural produce, with the European Union one of its major markets. The EU BDS campaign against Agrexco appears to have helped boost it into liquidation.

    link to electronicintifada.net

  2. HarryLaw says:

    Adam, Thanks for this report, the Co-op Sweden claims to have the results of an investigation that justify,in their view, the marketing of soda stream products. Co-op Sweden has refused to share the report with the Swedish activists. This report could be most illuminating, because the Co-op is owned by its members any member can ask for a copy. Hope you can do a follow up on this article Adam since these illegal business enterprises and settlements go to the heart of the problem.

  3. pabelmont says:

    A lot of work to produce such a comprehensive report. Nails them, point by illicit point. Now, one hopes that companies doing business with Sodastream will be concerned, honor the premise of BDS, read the report, and STOP THE TRADE.

  4. patm says:

    I just don’t get it.

    Have you not heard the news, 3e? The Palestinians themselves asked the peoples of the world to launch a BDS campaign.

    • patm says:

      Simple question: Why did you not respond to my answer? i.e. “The Palestinians themselves asked the peoples of the world to launch a BDS campaign.”

      Has it not occurred to you 3e that Palestinians will never give up their struggle for freedom and justice? That to them this struggle means more than anything your zionist oligarchs can provide in the way of jobs?

    • Shmuel says:

      3e,

      Your concern for Sodastream’s Palestinian employees is touching. Unlike you, all of the Palestinian trade unions that have adhered to the BDS campaign obviously have only their own narrow interests at heart.

      I guess the final paragraph of point 2 bears repeating:

      Palestinian workers often have no choice but to work in the settlements, with high unemployment rates that are a direct result of the Israeli occupation. The 2011 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development report explicitly links the decline in Palestinian agricultural and industrial sectors and the dire humanitarian conditions with Israeli government policies, in particular the confiscation of land and natural resources, restrictions on movement of people and goods, and isolation from international markets. Only a colonial mindset could claim to provide jobs to the very same people whose land and freedom have been stolen.

    • Shmuel says:

      And Hagit Ofran of Peace Now:

      I’ve seen discussions prompted by the right wing claiming that boycotting the settlements harms the tens of thousands of Palestinian workers who rely on those factories for work — as if the idea of building settlements was for the benefit of the Palestinians. That is inherently cynical and nasty. The factories that were built in the Occupied Territories were built on a foundation of exploitation and immorality, as part of the Israeli occupation that controls the lands without allowing the Palestinian residents of those lands any civil rights. Palestinian workers are not wronged by boycotts; they are systematically wronged by the reality of occupation.

      link to huffingtonpost.com

    • Cliff says:

      BDS is working. It’s just up against a Behemoth.

      You’re not going to deter these people, eee.

      And why don’t YOU tell us what Palestinian Sodastream workers are saying?

      Considering that BDS is a Palestinian civil society initiative, I doubt there is a widespread anti-BDS movement among Palestinian workers.

      And whatever by-product of boycotting Sodastream there may be, it does not compare to what Israel does to Palestinians.

      You go on and on about how you would DIE for your racist, apartheid, Jewish colony.

      Well Palestinians already are dying for their rights, freedom, etc.

      They don’t need some internet troll lecturing them. You are a nobody. Just another Afrikaaner parading around in Jewish identity politics.

    • patm says:

      Why did the employees take these jobs in the first place if BDS means more to them than the job?

      Shmuel handled that question above, 3e, but I will repeat his answer here:

      “Palestinian workers often have no choice but to work in the settlements, with high unemployment rates that are a direct result of the Israeli occupation. The 2011 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development report explicitly links the decline in Palestinian agricultural and industrial sectors and the dire humanitarian conditions with Israeli government policies, in particular the confiscation of land and natural resources, restrictions on movement of people and goods, and isolation from international markets. Only a colonial mindset could claim to provide jobs to the very same people whose land and freedom have been stolen.”

    • Shmuel says:

      Why don’t you just argue that even though they will be harmed short term, it makes sense because they will benefit long term?

      That’s the basic idea. Think workers’ rights in the early 20th-cent. A lot of workers lost their jobs or worse, but the struggle was worthwhile in the long run. Palestinian trade unions and civil society have asked the international community not to cross their picket line. They are fully aware of the costs, but also recognise the real sources of their oppression.

    • Shmuel says:

      Clearly they are against the BDS because otherwise they would not have taken those jobs. If they are willing to sacrifice short term for the long term benefits of the BDS, why did they take the job in the first place?

      Whether these specific workers were consulted is not a salient question. The insinuation that Israeli industry (or settlement construction) in the OT is somehow beneficial to Palestinians is, as Hagit Ofran put it, “cynical and nasty”.

    • Cliff says:

      If you are willing to DIE for your RACIST, apartheid, colonial-settler State then I am SURE Palestinian workers are willing to suffer economically for a just cause.

      And the question STILL REMAINS – who are these PALESTINIAN Sodastream workers????????

      Do you know them, eee?????

      Do you know what they’re saying? Cite their disapproval.

    • Shmuel says:

      Sweatshops must also be beneficial to their workers, or they wouldn’t have taken those jobs. Likewise services and industries that destroy local economies and all other means of earning a living. Gotta love the company store – or why would you buy there?

      I’ll tell you what. If the Sodastream workers oppose BDS, they can take it up with their union reps. I forgot; they don’t have any. But they must like it that way, or they wouldn’t have taken those jobs.

    • patm says:

      It is irresponsible of you to support this effort unless you have a true plan to alleviate the suffering of the Palestinian employees.

      You apparently will say anything to have the last word, 3e. Your masters at Hasbara Central must be very proud.

      To recap: Palestinians asked the world’s peoples to launch a BDS campaign.
      And yes, mondo readers do have “a true plan to alleviate the suffering of the Palestinian employees”. It is to bring to justice and freedom to all Palestinians.

  5. Linda J says:

    This video forwarded to our boycott list is some slick PR from SodaStream, showing their magnanimity in having Palestinians working right in their illegal settlement factory! Big of them, huh? link to compassionateseattle.org

    This kind of propaganda will certainly sway some people. The list is called Compassionate Seattle. I’m not sure if these videos go to all the members (apparently over 3,000 around the world).

    Some of the Palestinian workers forthrightly admit if they could find other work (with the PA), they would do it.

    The CEO conveniently wants everyone to put their guns down now (bet he doesn’t mean the IDF!)