Artifacts of the early Israel lobby: 1917 map for American consumption

Eretz Israel map from year of Balfour Declaration
Map produced for American Zionists in 1917, 'Eretz Israel'

From Dan Wyman Books in Brooklyn, which specializes in Judaica, a 1917 map from the Federation of American Zionists. Map is $135.

We are pleased to present to you this rare original WW I-era ... Hebrew map of Erez Israel created for the Federation of American Zionists by Israel Belkind in the year of the Balfour Declaration, 1917...

Belkind was born in Logoisk [Russia]. In 1882, while studying at Kharkov University, he was among the students who founded the Bilu movement and went to Erez Israel at the head of its first group... In 1903 he founded an agricultural training school at Shefeyah (near Zikhron Ya'akov) for orphans of the Kishinev pogroms whom he brought to Erez Israel.

...During World War I Belkind was in the U.S., where he published his memoirs in Yiddish, Di Ershte Shrit fun Yishuv Erets Yisroel ("The First Steps of the Jewish Settlement of Palestine," 1918), and created this map. Apart from numerous articles and popular pamphlets, Belkind published a geography of Palestine, Erez Yisrael ba-Zeman ha-Zeh ("The Land of Israel Today," 1928).

About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.
Posted in American Jewish Community, Israel Lobby

{ 33 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. pabelmont says:

    Does it show the villages which were disappeared (after their people were disappeared) in 1948?

    • james1118 says:

      One should look up ERETZ ISRAEL and check the maps……
      Israel has no intentions of peace. Quite the contrary, they want to control all the oil reserves in the Middle East…..

      • AllenBee says:

        I’ve struggled all weekend to wrap my mind around the first chapter of Benzion Netanyahu’s The Origins of the Inquisition in Fifteenth Century Spain.

        The title of the first chapter is “The Jewish Question.” Benzion locates the origin of “Jew hatred” that has “affected the history of mankind,” to an event in Egypt in ~525 BCE — shortly after Cyrus liberated Yehud from Nebuchadnezzar and provided them the first of 200 years’ worth of support to return to Jerusalem, that “zion” for which all Jews so ardently long.

        (All Jews except the majority of Jews who remained in Babylon/Persia, that is.)

        Here’s how Benzion expressed it:

        “The causes of the conflict between Jews and Greeks [from ~300 BCE to 1st century CE] . . .covered the whole gamut of human interests . . .political, social, economic, religious, and intellectual . . . In no other country in the ancient world did such a large array of factors combine to form the background of a lasting conflict between Jews and non-Jews as it did in Egypt and its dependencies. . . .And as if all of this were not enough to inflame the social atmosphere, there was the insistence of the Jews of Alexandria to be recognized as full-fledged citizens–and this in addition to the privileges they were granted in consideration of their religious needs.
        . . .This struggle of the Jews for civil equality was peculiar to the Greek – Jewish confrontation. For what was involved were not claims for rights such as trading facilities or freedom of movement, but for full participation in the country’s life . . . The Greeks, however, balked at the Jews’ demands; and the vigorous fight that the Jews of Alexandria . . .and other Greek cities . . .put up for their full rights as citizens bespoke an irrepressible desire for equality surpassing any similar claim put up by any other minority. . . .the stubborn insistence of the Jewish minority on equality of rights with the country’s upper classes. . . . The demand appeared strange, impudent, and unjust to all majorities among whom the Jews lived; but it did not appear strange to the Jews.”

        Readers should recall that at this time, Jews had their own land in Jerusalem, underwritten politically and financially by Persia.

        Here’s how American stated the situation:

        “if people want to be tribal they can and will be tribal, that’s their freedom to be/ live whatever/however they want as long as it’s not detrimental to others.
        What they have to be told, taught, shown though, however you want to put it, is they have to keep their tribalism to themselves, not demand exorbitant things from others for their tribe, not impose their tribal interest on others, not step on others rights/interest.”

        Pabelmont responded (or has commented in other responses):

        the key factor in making these “neuroses” worse than usual was, as the Zios say in another context, the lack of a country with a single people and a well-defined territory.”

        And in the middle time, in 1919, when the Versailles treaty was being hammered out, with overwhelming Jewish/zionist representation and negotiating power at the table, here’s how Edwin Black summarized the ‘wants’ zionists brought to the table, and succeeded in acquiring:

        Black wrote in “The Transfer Agreement:”

        “[Jewish] Committee leaders were repulsed by Zionism. In their view, a refuge in Palestine would promote Jewish expulsions from countries where Jews lived and enjoyed roots. Anti-Semitic regimes could point to Palestine and claim, ‘You belong there in your own nation.’ However, majority Jewish sentiments won out at Versailles, assuring a Jewish homeland in Palestine, with stipulations preserving Jewish rights in other countries.
        American Jewish Congress leaders returned from Versailles in triumph. They had helped create a Jewish homeland, as well as secure international guarantees for minorities in Europe.”

        When, as Benzion Netanyahu wrote, Jews in Alexandrine Egypt demanded full equality for a minority in Egypt, Jews DID have a homeland in Palestine, underwritten politically and financially by Persia.

        Conversely, by 1919, Jews already had significant settlements in Palestine and by the terms of Versailles gained a legal claim to that territory, and Jews, a minority population, were also the dominant force in Weimar Germany.

        Thus in both eras, Jews had BOTH their own land, and they demanded “equality with the upper classes” as a minority in the lands of others. In both instances, that “irrepressible desire for equality surpassing any similar claim put up by any other minority” devolved into the growth of political anti-Semitism among various organizations and political parties.

        American gets it:

        “they have to keep their tribalism to themselves, not demand exorbitant things from others for their tribe, not impose their tribal interest on others, not step on others rights/interest.”

        My kids Got It by the time they could talk: “I do,” they would say to me; their 3-year old I demanded sovereignty over their own space and fate.

        Netanyahu didn’t get it. He consistently correlated the emergence of “Jew hatred/antisemitism” with the rise in Jewish economic prosperity, ascribing the “hatred” to mere economic envy. My kids didn’t demand money or material boons, they demanded sovereignty over their own lives. So did Greeks and Egyptians 2300 years ago, and Germans in the mid-20th century. So do Palestinians — and Americans — today. We all know how to make our own way materially, thank you very much.

        imo, statements like this one:

        . . .our [American Jew's] vanguard liberal position in American politics and culture coupled with our reactionary stance on Israel and Palestine and the Arab Spring, our cowardice on the one issue for which we have the greatest responsibility, and our inability to grapple with our wealth and influence, even as we are shouting down the Tea Party.”

        suggest that Phil doesn’t Get It either.

        • Avi_G. says:

          Benzion locates the origin of “Jew hatred” that has “affected the history of mankind,” to an event in Egypt in ~525 BCE

          Time sure flies, but I vividly remember the events of that year as though it was yesterday. I was a sandal salesman at the time, but as a Jew, the events of that year left me with deep emotional scars for millennia to come. Never forget.

        • lysias says:

          In 525 B.C., Alexandria did not yet exist, and, while there were some Greeks in Egypt, they were not there in anything like the numbers they achieved after Alexander’s conquests. I wonder how many Jews (perhaps better called Hebrews at that point) were then in Egypt.

        • AllenBee says:

          Netanyahu attached the 525 BC date to the situation in which Jewish (he calls them Jewish) mercenaries guarded Egypt at Jeb (Elephantine).

          After Persia liberated Jews ~536, Persia initiated campaigns of conquest, including incursions into Egypt. Netanyahu argues that “it stands to reason” that the Jewish mercenaries at Jeb would not defend Egypt but would support Persia (Esther & killing of 75,000 Persians notwithstanding). This switch of allegiances would naturally, Benzion asserts, result in enraging Egyptians, producing “seething hatred” of Jews.

          The 525 date is the earliest date he states. He tracks the development of Egyptian/Greek “Jew hatred” forward, step by step, first Alexander’s conquest which involved Greeks merging into Egypt where Jews had gained political and economic posts which “enraged” both Egyptians and Greeks, etc etc etc.

          His arguments are loaded with “may haves” and “perhaps-s” and “stands to reason-s” and plain old speculations based on projections. On the basis of that holey gauze, he sets up the “elements and pattern” of “Jew hatred” that has “affected mankind throughout history.”
          it makes your head explode.

          In a video conversation about the 2006 assault on Lebanon, Norman Finkelstein says “Jews never forgive, Jews never forget; I admire that.” That statement greatly diminished my respect for Finkelstein.

        • marc b. says:

          In 525 B.C., Alexandria did not yet exist, and, while there were some Greeks in Egypt, they were not there in anything like the numbers they achieved after Alexander’s conquests.

          what’s a bit of history, lysias, compared to benzion’s intuition.

          interesting, in louis malle’s ‘au revoir les enfants’, the jewish child being sheltered in a carmelite school in France during the 2nd WW refuses to study greek. now i know why.

        • marc b. says:

          His arguments are loaded with “may haves” and “perhaps-s” and “stands to reason-s” and plain old speculations based on projections.

          so, allenbee, this is history as practiced by freud as well, in ‘moses and monotheism’.

    • Samuel T says:

      The Map is dated as 1917… Back to the Future,
      good movie, but it was Fictional.

  2. seafoid says:

    Looking at the map now what befell the people who lived there in 1917 was worse than the plague. It was worse than anyone’s worst nightmare. And poor old Judaism has been hollowed out by Zionism.

  3. seafoid says:

    BTW didn’t the Jews always live in Israel? why did they need maps of Jewish land? didn’t they know the borders of Jewish land ?

  4. eGuard says:

    Peter Beinart will come to the rescue.

  5. ritzl says:

    AKA, ALL the water[sheds] in the region.

    Old map. Ongoing, though ever so slightly constrained (Jordan), process. Explains almost everything about this conflict, its zero-sum and/or covetous bitterness, its lack of a resolution, and a lot of the comments here in support of the above from the resident hasbarachiks.

  6. Talkback says:

    This were the borders for a “Jewish national home” proposed by the Zionists at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919:
    link to mideastweb.org

  7. Shmuel says:

    Unfortunately, the quality of the image makes a detailed analysis of the map very difficult. I have a friend who has written extensively on the use of maps to convey political and ideological messages (mostly Italian and German maps, although he’s also done a little work on Israeli maps). Maybe I can get him to dip into his research fund and buy a copy :-)

    Just a few points I found interesting (from what I could decipher):
    1. The paranthetical note next to the Hebrew date: “5677 (1848 [years] since the Destruction [of the Temple])”.
    2. The use of Turkish administrative terms in the legend: “vilayet”, “senjak” and another one I presume is Turkish but couldn’t make out .
    3. The designation of other places as either “Arab village” (kefar aravi), “Hebrew colony” (moshavah ivrit) or “German colony” (moshavah germanit).
    4. The sea opposite the southern coast (from Haifa southward) is called the “Philistine Sea”.

    • lysias says:

      Even though Germany was a wartime ally of the Ottoman Empire in 1917, I am surprised that there should have been one or more German colonies in Palestine at that point.

      • Shmuel says:

        I am surprised that there should have been one or more German colonies in Palestine at that point.

        The reference is undoubtedly to the Templer colonies (I think there were about 7 or 8 of them), much admired (and envied) by the Zionists.

        • lysias says:

          Thanks. Here’s a Wikipedia article on the Templers (of whom I do not think I had ever heard) and their colonies: Templers. Also, in German, Tempelgesellschaft.

          Interesting that the last remaining German Templer colonists were expelled from Israel in 1948-50:

          Am 17. April 1948, einen Monat vor der israelischen Unabhängigkeitserklärung, besetzten bewaffnete jüdische Trupps die Siedlung Waldheim. Die dort verbliebenen Internierten werden durch die britischen Behörden in ein Zeltcamp für deutsche Displaced Persons nach Famagusta auf Zypern abtransportiert. Von Zypern aus wanderten viele nach Australien aus; einige kehrten jedoch ab 1949 in die württembergische Heimat ihrer Vorfahren zurück.

          1950 forderten die israelischen Behörden die letzten noch in Palästina verbliebenen Templer zum Verlassen des Landes auf. Am 13. April 1950 verließ der Tempelvorsteher Jerusalem mit Bestimmungsort Bentleigh (Australien). 80 Jahre Wirksamkeit der Templer in Palästina waren damit zu Ende.

        • Sumud says:

          lysias ~ I also knew very little about the Templers.

          Interesting precedent set by Israel in 1962 detailed on that wiki entry, to do with the expulsion of about 1000 Templers by mandate authorities in 1939:

          The number of Germans deported from Palestine was greater than the number of returning Jews.”[15] In 1962 the State of Israel paid 54 million Deutsche Marks in compensation to property owners whose assets were nationalised”

          So what about the 750,000 Palestinians whose property was “nationalised” in 1947/8/9 and the further 2-300,000 in 1967? That’s a whole lot of reparations.