Graham and Rubio are dependent on pro-Israel money in bid for White House

Two jawdropping stories from the Republican presidential race.

First, Sen. Lindsey Graham talked about the challenges of raising money for his presidential race on a Wall Street Journal blog. Lobelog picks it up:

He described “the means” as the biggest hurdle facing his potential campaign, adding:

“If I put together a finance team that will make me financially competitive enough to stay in this thing…  I may have the first all-Jewish cabinet in America because of the pro-Israel funding.  [Chuckles.]  Bottom line is, I’ve got a lot of support from the pro-Israel funding.”

Second, Norman Braman is reported to be Marco Rubio’s biggest financial backer for the Republican nomination for the presidency; Politico describes him as another Sheldon Adelson, willing to spend $25 million, friends say, in order to make Rubio king. He doesn’t like Jeb Bush.

Turns out that a few days after Rubio was elected to the Senate, Nov. 2, 2010, he made his first trip to Israel, a trip he had long talked about with Braman. Rubio and his wife met Braman and his wife and her sister over there. The Miami Herald wrote about the trip in 2010: “Guess who’s meeting Marco Rubio in Israel?”

Braman is 82 and a self-made billionaire– car dealerships, NFL teams– and was once 286 on the Forbes list, though that was before he got snookered by Bernie Madoff.

The Politico article doesn’t say what Lindsey Graham is willing to say, doesn’t mention the fact that Braman is Jewish, though it says he and Rubio share a love of Israel. Here they are at an Israel solidarity rally, declaring their support for Israel.

“A very unsettling time” for Israel, Braman says here. He’s worried about the boycott movement worldwide and the delegitimization of Israel. Young people don’t understand how important the creation of Israel was for Jewish life in the U.S.

I remember all the fields in the United States that were closed to Jews… that there were a limited number of major Jewish law firms… There were very few Jews in banking, very few Jews in investment banking other than Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers and a few others… and the general lack of respect that existed for Jews… Jews in general always being thought– ‘Well Jews are smart, but they don’t fight back.’.. Israel changed all that. I’m convinced Israel changed all that. All the advantages that Jews have today, that gneerations have since the establishment of Israel has been augmented by Israel…

The man Rubio calls a father figure says he’s unhappy about the state of the world:

I worry whether there’s going to be an Israel in the next 50 years from now…

How do you make peace with people who want to destroy you and are dedicated to your destruction?

Rubio is trying to stick language in the Iran deal demanding that Iran recognize Israel’s right to exist. Is he reflecting Braman’s concerns? You bet.

Rubio and Ted Cruz are also hoping for support from Paul Singer, a hedge fund billionaire in New York who loves Israel.A couple of questions: Could this giant support be any part of the reason that James Baker has come out criticizing the Iran deal? Baker is close to the Bush family, is a foreign policy adviser to Jeb Bush, and was slammed by Israel supporters for criticizing the Israeli occupation at J Street’s conference.

Will Braman’s obvious influence, and Adelson’s, and Haim Saban’s weekend announcement for Hillary Clinton, allow the mainstream media, the Stephanopouloses and Matthewses and Zakarias of the world, to talk about the role of the Israel lobby in the presidential race? I know, it’s so obvious. But the media are afraid to touch it because it seems to feed into anti-semitic tropes, Jewish influence. When Lindsey Graham explicitly describes it as Jewish influence, though in his case they’re pushing on an open door.

Possibly this money is generational? It is older Jews who see Israel as a fulfillment of the Never-again vow they made after the Holocaust. So can J Street point to a younger group of Jewish donors who are opposed to the occupation?

And are there any billionaires (of any religion or ethnicity) who are involved in the presidential race who are anti-Zionist, who want Israel to become a state of its citizens, all its citizens, rather than just the Jewish ones?

24 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Lotta dough. Good to see the hard-right-Zionist donation-system so succinctly spelled out. If anyone were to be bravge enough to point it out, it’d make a good story. So clear. So round. So fully packed.

Braman is 82 and a self-made billionaire– car dealerships, NFL teams– and was once 286 on the Forbes list, though that was before he got snookered by Bernie Madoff.

Excuse me while I shed some crocodile tears. So sad.

These people are vanity candidates, they really don’t have a prayer but will waste a lot of good Jewish money. The good news is that while these narcissists think they can win, their Jewish backers think it will give them mileage in getting their pro Israel agenda out. But in today’s world, all that will do is highlight the influence of a foreign power in domestic politics and I think proud Americans will resent that

Could this giant support be any part of the reason that James Baker has come out criticizing the Iran deal? Baker is close to the Bush family, is a foreign policy adviser to Jeb Bush, and was slammed by Israel supporters for criticizing the Israeli occupation at J Street’s conference.

It’s too late for Fredo. He took sides against the family. Holy Mary.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeZ5GpcG4sc

RE: “How do you make peace with people who want to destroy you and are dedicated to your destruction?” ~ Norman Braman

URI AVNERY ON HOW THE ISRAELIS (AND PERHAPS OTHERS) HAVE BEEN “BRAINWASHED”:
“Israel’s Weird Elections”, by Uri Avnery, Counterpunch, 1/04/13:

[EXCERPTS] . . . The Israeli media are already to a large extent neutralized, a creeping process not unsimilar to what the Germans used to call Gleichschaltung. [SEE: Gleichschaltung @- Wikipedia – J.L.D. ]
All three TV channels are more or less bankrupt and dependent on government handouts. Their editors are practically government appointees. The printed press is also teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, except the largest “news” paper, which belongs to Sheldon Adelson and is a Netanyahu propaganda sheet, distributed gratis.
[Naftali] Bennett repeats the ridiculous assertion that almost all journalists are left-wingers (meaning traitors.) He promises to put an end to this intolerable situation. . .
. . . In the coming four years, the official annexation of the West Bank to Israel may become a fact. . .
. . . If the government continues on its present course, this will lead to certain disaster – the entire country between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River will become one unit under Israeli rule. This Greater Israel will contain an Arab majority and a shrinking Jewish minority, turning it inevitably into an apartheid state, plagued by a permanent civil war and shunned by the world.
If pressure from without and within eventually compels the government to grant civil rights to the Arab majority, the country will turn into an Arab state. 134 years of Zionist endeavor will come to naught, a repetition of the Crusaders’ kingdom.
This is so obvious, so inevitable, that one needs an iron will not to think about it. It seems that all major parties in these elections have this will. Speaking about peace, they believe, is poison. Giving back the West Bank and East Jerusalem for peace? God forbid even thinking about it.
The weird fact is that this week two respected polls – independent of each other – came to the same conclusion: the great majority of Israeli voters favors the “two-state solution”
, the creation of a Palestinian state along the 1967 borders and the partition of Jerusalem. This majority includes the majority of Likud voters, and even about half of Bennett’s adherents.
How come? The explanation lies in the next question: How many voters believe that this solution is possible? The answer: almost nobody. Over dozens of years, Israelis have been brainwashed into believing that “the Arabs” don’t want peace. If they say they do, they are lying.
If peace is impossible, why think about it? Why even mention it in the election campaign? Why not go back 44 years to Golda Meir’s days and pretend that the Palestinians don’t exist? (“There is no such thing as a Palestinian people…It is not as though there was a Palestinian people and we came and threw them out and took their country away. They did not exist.” – Golda Meir, June 13, 1969)…

ENTIRE COMMENTARY – http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/01/04/israels-weird-elections/