News

Gen. Dayton says 2-state solution has 2 year sell-by date

Report by Robert Dreyfuss in the Nation, on an appearance at Washington Institute for Near East Policy last week of Lt. Gen. Keith Dayton, who is training Palestinian troops in the West Bank and who said that two-state solution is required, and in a hurry:

Recognizing that by organizing and training thousands of Palestinian
troops, professionally led, he is creating in effect a nationalist
army, Dayton warned the 500 or so WINEP listeners that the troops can
only be strung along for just so long. "With big expectations, come big
risks," said Dayton. "There is perhaps a two-year shelf life on being
told that you're creating a state, when you're not." To my ears, at
least, his subtle warning is that if concrete progress isn't made
toward a Palestinian state, the very troops Dayton is assembling could
rebel.

Dayton was responding to a question from Paul Wolfowitz,
the neoconservative former deputy secretary of defense, who now hangs
his hat at the neocon-dominated American Enterprise Institute. "How
many Palestinians see your people as collaborators?" Wolfowitz asked.
In answering Wolfowitz, the general acknowledged that Hamas and its
sympathizers accuse the Palestinian battalions of being "enforcers of
the Israeli occuption." But he stressed that each one of them believes
that he is fighting for an independent Palestine.

Jeff Blankfort responds:
I don't agree with Dreyfuss's analysis, that the US trained army will turn on Israel if there is not a move towards Palestinian statehood. There is a sad phenomenon one sees throughout the world–El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Burma, and numerous African countries– in which armies composed of a nation's poor have no problems in being convinced, thanks to money and status, to murder their fellow poor. One of the problems that I found with Fatah and its supporters going back to 1970 was that, beyond simple nationalism, with few exceptions, they were totally lacking in political awareness and, as such, Yasser Arafat, was ideal as their leader. When Fatah members started thinking for themselves and raising important questions, they were routinely purged. When the Fatah paper, Al-Fajr,raised questions about PLO corruption in the early 90s, Arafat shut it down. That the PA/Fatah troops suppressed protests in the West Bank during Gaza, that they stand by while Israeli soldiers continue to assassinate other Palestinians and destroy homes of their fellow Palestinians in the West Bank speaks volumes and the sound they make is very ugly. I guess they would have no problem controlling a Palestinian Bantustan which seems, in fact, what they are being trained to do.

2 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments