News

Comparing the spin on Israeli settlements from Al Jazeera America and Al Jazeera English

The announcement that Al Jazeera would be creating a US branch is a hopeful departure from the rest of mainstream coverage of the Middle East. While some initial reports implied Al Jazeera America would rely on its Doha headquarters for 40 percent of its programming, it now seems they will be operating rather independently- hiring their own White House correspondent  etc.  Strategically, they have already hired a number of recognizable figures from US cable media (ABC News’s Lisa Fletcher and Kate O’Brian as well as CNN’s Soledad O’Brien and Joie Chen) to bring familiarity to US audiences.

But already, that familiarity is extending beyond the names of those delivering the news into the content.

Both Al Jazeera English and Al Jazeera America published articles online on August 13 regarding Israel’s announcement of 942 new settlements in Gilo in the midst of yet another round of US mediated peace talks.

The first lines of the articles set different tones —

Al Jazeera America: “Israel has approved 942 new settlement housing units in East Jerusalem, according to a local official”

Al Jazeera English: “Israel’s latest announcement of more than 900 new illegal settlement units in occupied East Jerusalem ‘threatens’ talks with the Palestinians, a senior Palestinian official has said”.

While discussing the legitimacy of such settlements, Al Jazeera America writes “Gilo is an existing Israeli settlement in east Jerusalem, which Palestinians see as part of their future state. The U.N. deems illegal all Israeli settlement on land conquered in the war of June 1967, which includes East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza”

Al Jazeera English explains, “The last talks in 2010 broke down on the issue of settlements, which are illegal under international law.”

While Al Jazeera America seems to be concerned with treading lightly, Al Jazeera English does what it is admired for- delivering facts and connecting the dots between actions and their potential ramifications for future peace negotiations. Why wouldn’t Al Jazeera America call the settlements “illegal settlements”? Why include that Israel “conquered” the land in the war of 1967? Why not mention that the continuation of settlement building in the midst of talks where “all options are on the table” exposes Israel as a partner that is not interested in peace but in PR?

While I have high hopes the Al Jazeera America will introduce a certain degree of integrity into the US media landscape, I am fearful that a familiar US-centered policy towards Palestine and Israel will remain.

21 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Thats not surprising. The whole deal with an americanized Al jazeera is to publish these kind of articles that are not negative on Israel/US.

The key is not only that the America version is already less objective and informative, but that the Al Jazeera English will not be available to Americans; at least that’s what I read online. If so, who decided this new deal? Anybody know? What exactly are the US cable TV powers doing here? The same thing they’ve done in effect with CSPAN’s lop-sided coverage of the I-P issue on Washington Journal?

Helpful comparison, Keren. Thank you.

I suspect AJ America’s editors are tuning their editorial tone to the American ear, and are sensitive to being dismissed out of hand as reliably biased against America and Israel for “the enemy.”

Frankly, it seems daunting to write and report for Al Jazeera, against a tide of Islam-ophobia. Among successful white retirees, the references to “news outlets” at social gatherings is heavily weighted to the Fox/CNN spectrum, and points rightward, except when its academics, where PBS, NPR, occasionally BBC figure in reliably.

I’ve never heard anyone else point me to Mondoweiss or Al Jazeera or even Antiwar.com. Hasbara seems to work to some extent. I think a reference to Al Jazeera would be pretty provocative at these gatherings. It would be interesting to see how many people read Mondoweiss, what its market demographics are, compared to Glenn Beck, for example.

…”which Palestinians see as part of their future state. ” always makes me laugh.

Say your car is stolen. You go to the police. They file a report that says “the car which x sees as hers” .
Only in Israel.

Al Jazeera America is doomed, I fear. Won’t have 20% of Greenwald’s spine or integrity.
————————

Citizen

If so, who decided this new deal? Anybody know?

The usual suspects: Israel-Firster media types or owners.