Activism

Loyola student government president vetoes divestment resolution

538014_10202963632467686_653963018_n

The president of Loyola University Chicago’s student government vetoed a resolution that called for the school to divest from corporations complicit in the Israeli occupation. The veto, which came after two votes in favor of divestment, was applauded by Chicago-area Jewish groups.

Pedro Guerrero, the president of the Loyola United Student Government Association (USA), made the announcement yesterday in a letter, writing that “no matter what viewpoint you hold on the larger issue, this resolution caused harm among the student community.”  Guerrero also wrote that the “diversity of thought on campus was not taken into consideration.”

The Jewish Telegraphic Agency reports that the Metro Chicago Hillel and the Jewish United Fund–a group that met with student senators after the initial divestment vote–praised the move. “By affirming the need for USGA to give due consideration to ‘diversity of thought on campus,’ President Guerrero and other USGA Senators, as well as the administration of Loyola University Chicago, have reaffirmed the values-based and inclusive culture that have always made this Jesuit university a welcoming home for Jews and other minority students,” the groups said in a joint statement.

A two-thirds vote in the student government is needed to overturn the veto.  The first divestment vote passed overwhelmingly, with 26 senators voting in favor. But the second divestment vote on Tuesday evening passed with a much narrower margin–12-10 (with nine abstentions).

The Students For Justice in Palestine (SJP) chapter slammed the veto in a statement.

“Although President Guerrero caved into pressure and vetoed a resolution that passed twice, we still see this as a victory and a step in the right direction. Many members of the USGA stood on the right side despite intense pressure, intimidation, and harassment,” said SJP chapter president and student senator Nashiha Alam. “There has been a shift in discourse on our campus. People are concerned about tuition money being invested in corporations that commit human rights abuses in Palestine. There is an energy from a diverse range of students, faculty and staff who want to take action. We are winning.”

38 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Looks the organized American Jewish community is showing it’s true colors: anti-democracy, racist, White Supremacy, etc.

Pro-Israel students at Chicago’s Loyola University met with the student government president in an effort to overturn a divestment resolution on Israel.
Representatives of the university’s pro-Israel community and the Jewish United Fund’s Israel Education Center met with Pedro Guerrero of the Loyola United Student Government Association on March 19, a day after the Loyola United Student Government Association voted 26-0 with two abstentions on the divestment measure.

http://www.jta.org/2014/03/24/news-opinion/united-states/loyola-u-students-working-to-overturn-divestment-vote#ixzz2xAlZvEPi

So basically Jewish groups met with this guy and talked him into vetoing the resolution.

In spite of the vote, these groups were able to bypass all those pesky opinions of the people who actually go to the school.

Disgusting. Fucking disgusting.

It’s all about Zionist donor dollars. The hispanic leaders have become aware of this.

ah the auld veto, i should have seen that coming.

diversity of thought on campus can be construe as the majority

the Michigan Daily wrote a nice piece in support of SAFE University of Michigan:

An ethical investment https://www.michigandaily.com/opinion/03daily-divestment27

CSG’s refusal to vote on the resolution was a failure in the institution of student representation. Student government has a responsibility to listen to the demands of the student body. The student government is not bound by any requirement to only represent a majority voice on campus. In fact, as the representative body, CSG is obligated to highlight the perspective of minority and underrepresented groups. A blind endorsement of the majority prerogative is to create a dangerously homogenous voice. The University of Michigan is a diverse institution that values all points of view, and the student government should act as such.

a much narrower margin–12-10 (with nine abstentions).

they should challenge the veto. get those nine abstentions to vote and win by 2/3.

Interesting, all these private businesses calling themselves university and such, having “Student Governments” with bylaws, Presidents with veto powers (just in case a nuclear standoff has to be handled on time…), pump, circumstance…
in private businesses where not even the BoR applies! The Sponsors command, the owners enforce and the students indentured for life by over-mortgage-size tuition obey.
These are not appropriate circumstances for the procedure adopted. Clandestine action, disruption, educative guerrilla tactics to expose the Zionist machine come to mind as more efficient.