News

‘NYT’ scrubs ‘analysis’ that Hamas is ‘seen in West as the devil’

Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
Devil
Devil

This is funny, and not.

Yesterday the Times ran a news analysis of the breakdown in the peace talks, in which Jerusalem bureau chief Jodi Rudoren observed that Mahmoud Abbas

finally, made a deal this week with Hamas, the militant Islamic group widely seen in the West as the devil.

Anticipating what was coming, Adam made a screenshot. It’s at the end of the second paragraph:

New York Times story before it got fixed, removing devil.
New York Times story before it got fixed, removing devil.

The Times soon changed the line yesterday afternoon:

[Abbas] made a deal this week with Hamas, the militant Islamic group that is widely reviled in the West.

There was a lot of sport about this on Twitter, as you can imagine. Yousef Munayyer:

Eli Clifton:

Though it’s really not that funny. I can’t imagine an NYT analysis characterizing the Muslim Brotherhood in that way. Only ideologues would call the Brothers the devil. But in the Israel Palestine context, ideologues have sway.

Rania Khalek pointed out another problem with the Times analysis– the “casual racism” of this observation:

“Absent a peace process, the threat of a binational state in which Arabs could soon outnumber Jews grows more potent.”

That’s the kind of fear that keeps folks at the Times up at night. 

Munayyer followed:

That part of the Times story, of course, hasn’t been changed. Though I’d say the outrage over it is a new theme in western media, and even liberal Zionists don’t have an answer to it.

Obama’s friend Eric Yoffie, the former leader of the Reform Jewish community, wrote three years ago that he doesn’t want “too many Arabs” in Israel. Another liberal Zionist, Aaron David Miller, warned about “too many… Palestinians” in Israel in the pages of the New York Times. Munayyer challenged him about this:

Tell us, how many Arabs are too many? How many human souls of an ethnicity inconvenient to your ideology are intolerable for you? Please put a number on it, I demand you do, so that we can better define the extent of your racism.

The “demographic threat” crowd, like the “time is running out” crowd will avoid an answer because doing so refocuses serious and morally grounded observers to the real problem: Zionism and its fundamental incompatibility with democracy, liberalism, pluralism and the twenty-first century.

This is perhaps the greatest difference between the United States and Israel.

Before long it won’t be alright to utter this sort of thing. But I’m not going to hold my breath.

P.S. Rudoren said earlier this year, “I come knowledgeable about the Jewish American or Jewish Israeli side of this beat.” That familiarity is what underlies both problematic statements above.

100 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Thanks Phil and Adam. Munayyer summarizes “I demand you do, so that we can better define the extent of your racism.” And the same congress person who helped lead congress into isolating Palestinians for voting in a free and fair election for Hamas in 2006 will continue trying to isolate Palestinians. http://ros-lehtinen.house.gov/press-release/peace-process-has-stalled-secretary-kerry-must-unambiguously-state-us-will-withhold ““Though the EU may mistakenly hail the Fatah-Hamas unity agreement as a welcome step, this is anything but, and Secretary Kerry must make… Read more »

“Absent a negotiated settlement, the threat of a multicultural state in which non-whites could soon outnumber whites grows more potent.”

We often become so accustomed to the bigotry which is drenched in the reporting on Israel/Palestine that we often forget just how viciously racist the coverage can be.

The New York Times, the preeminent “liberal” newspaper.
And supporter of racial Apartheid for Jews.

I think I’m more interested in the withdrawal rather than the utterance of the phrase. It is after all quite true that Hamas is viewed by some not just as menacing but as embodying some sort of mystical concept of evil well captured in the image used – Tarot card, I think. And it’s quite fair to say that this view is widespread. Rudoren alludes to the idea of a deal with the devil, also… Read more »

And Israel created the Devil. PA is trying to civilize but the effort is not welcomed .

” . . . Hamas, the militant Islamic group that is widely reviled in the West.”

Which “West” is that? Widely reviled in the UK? Italy? Croatia? Scandinavia? Maybe it’s to mean the West Wing? But I doubt it’s even true in the upper West side. Perhaps it’s the West facing windows of the Times building.