Trending Topics:

Why did Brookings Institution hold a secret panel countering BDS?

US Politics
on 12 Comments

Last June, Haim Saban and Sheldon Adelson held a secret summit in Las Vegas to come up with ways of fighting the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign on college campuses. They raised a reported $50 million to do so.

Well now that secret process seems to have moved on to far more influential turf, to Washington, D.C., and a leading liberal thinktank: last week the Brookings Institution held a secret panel on BDS, sponsored by Haim Saban. By all appearances, the intent of the panel was to counter the BDS campaign.

The panel took place during the weekend-long annual Saban Forum, which brings Israeli leaders and US leaders together to talk about “the future for Israelis and Palestinians”–without any Palestinians in attendance. The BDS panel was among many meetings December 4-6 not mentioned on the Saban Forum’s public agenda.

On Saturday night, journalist Jeffrey Goldberg said at a public panel: “This morning at the BDS panel–” But he was promptly hushed.

“Which was off the record,” a woman’s voice says; and my guess is it’s the same voice who just introduced Goldberg, Tamara Cofman Wittes, the leader of the conference.

Goldberg jokingly called the BDS panel the “Dimona” of panels, a reference to Israel’s secret nuclear program, and reported on its dire mood:

“If the BDS panel took place, there would have been a feeling that the Israeli participant in the panel was the object of a lot of yearning and anxiety from some Americans who felt as if Israel was not paying sufficient attention to what’s going on on campuses and beyond.”

Goldberg wasn’t the only journalist at the panel. Chemi Shalev of Haaretz was there and referred elliptically to it in print when he described the mood of the Saban forum as being one of “anxiety and anguish” on the part of Americans.

I asked Shalev why he had agreed to treat a newsworthy panel as off the record, and I said I found it unseemly that Brookings was performing an “AIPAC-like function” in fighting the BDS movement, and doing so in secret. He responded to me:

“The Saban inviters lay down the ground rules for the entire forum and one can either choose to accept and attend or reject and not attend. I chose the former… I don’t agree with characterization of what was going on at Saban, re ‘AIPAC like function’; in fact, I would say the opposite: criticism of Israeli government and deep frustration with its policies overwhelmingly outstripped praise or support, as I myself have written.”

When I asked Shalev whether any supporter of BDS was on the panel, he declined to answer, but said my guess on that score was probably right. That means no one was advocating for BDS.

I wrote to Wittes, director of the Brookings Center for Middle East Policy, and to a Brookings spokesperson to ask who was on the panel and what its title was, and if any advocates for BDS were on the panel. Neither responded to my questions.

Brookings would surely defend the secret panel by saying it’s part of a largely off-the-record conference among Israeli and American leaders. Shalev described the gathering in his article as a meeting of “[Haim] Saban’s American contingent of Brookings scholars, former Democratic administration officials and members of Congress” and an “Israeli delegation of mainstream Israeli politicians, journalists and businessmen.”

Americans should be asking why such a conference is taking place behind closed doors at a leading liberal thinktank– and why it’s tackling BDS, which Israeli leaders have termed an “existential” threat to Israel.

The gathering is a reflection of the power of the Israel lobby in Washington. Saban successfully pressured President Obama to stop putting pressure on Israel over settlements, by coming out for the president in 2012 and giving a Democratic SuperPAC a $1 million donation (as documented here). Both Wittes and Goldberg referred affectionately to Israeli politicians Yitzhak Herzog– who opposed the Iran Deal– and Avigdor Lieberman–who has called for the transfer of Palestinians– by their nicknames, “Boogie” and “Yvet.”

What were they talking about at the BDS panel? In the Saban Forum transcript of Goldberg’s public comments on Saturday night (the audio is a bit more inclusive), Goldberg brought up the BDS panel as evidence of the “pervasive unease on the part of many Americans” about Israel’s conduct: “trying to warn their Israeli friends that a train is coming barreling down the tracks” and they’re just standing there.

Many of those Americans are Jewish Zionists. Shalev reported that the American group at the conference were reassured by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s statement to the conference that he still favored the “two-state solution.” That might be hypocritical, Shalev observed, but it’s how the game works:

Armed with this facade, American Jews can lobby the administration to support Israel, protest against unwarranted bias in Europe and the United Nations, and, most importantly, look themselves in the mirror.

Brookings might defend a secret panel on BDS by pointing out that countless US politicians are opposing BDS. Many Republicans have come out against  BDS. And in her speech to the Saban conference the day after the BDS panel, Hillary Clinton asserted — laughably– that BDS is hurting the American ability to counter terrorism in the Middle East, because it is hurting our closest ally in the fight against extremism. She was surely pandering to Haim Saban. Clinton wrote a letter to Saban last summer that she promptly published, promising to work with Republican politicians to oppose BDS.

I find the whole matter unseemly. BDS is one of the chief threats to Israel, Netanyahu has said. So a leading liberal American thinktank is aligning itself with Israel on that battle? And if it is, why can’t it do so openly? One can fairly ask if Saban’s largesse is dictating the Brookings position, and that of the Democratic Party too.

BDS is clearly coming on strong despite all these efforts. At that event on December 5, Goldberg went on about the BDS panel that dare not speak its name, and related an anecdote from his daughter’s college campus.

Goldberg: Our oldest daughter is a freshman at a liberal arts college in New England, a pretty well-known school. And she reports to us that J Street at that street
represents the Zionist right–”

[Haim Saban seems to break in on Goldberg from the audience.]

“I wish it were funny, Haim. I wish it were funny. I mean, it’s funny, but it’s not funny. It could be both funny and not funny at the same time. Have you ever heard of a tragic comedy? You live in Hollywood. She reports that the largest Jewish organization — 25 percent of this campus is Jewish — the largest Jewish organization is a group called Jewish Voice for Peace, which is an Orwellian name for a group that opposes Israeli’s existence.

MR. HERZOG: We saw a huge write up it in Israel. It’s a huge BDS group.

Goldberg then said that sentiment toward Israel in the American Jewish comunity was “radically shifting,” and asked Lieberman if he cared. Lieberman said, “To speak frankly, I don’t care.” He called for better hasbara and Zionist education.

Later a woman in the audience, evidently Jewish, implored Lieberman to care.

you are also missing something if you think that any amount of education is going to change the fact that the millennials today do not relate to the narrative that you’re expressing. And so my question for you is simple. Do you care if we lose the young Jews in the diaspora?

Jewish Voice for Peace is surely the fastest-growing Jewish group in the country and the largest Jewish peace and justice organization in the US. It has 200,000 supporters. It has no place at Brookings– and it wasn’t invited to the Haaretz New Israel Fund conference last weekend either.

philweiss
About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.

Other posts by .


Posted In:

12 Responses

  1. Krauss
    Krauss
    December 17, 2015, 4:30 pm

    Goldberg then said that sentiment toward Israel in the American Jewish comunity was “radically shifting,” and asked Lieberman if he cared. Lieberman said, “To speak frankly, I don’t care.”

    I’m not really sure why this answer would shock anyone. Israeli Zionist Jews have long seen diaspora Jews as weaklings, look up what galut actually means.

    Lest we also forget that the Zionist leadership, under Ben-Gurion, double-dealed with Nazi Germany in the pre-war years as they passively looked on even as increasing anti-Jewish sentiment became unavoidable to deny.

    The most disturbing thing to me is this whole secrecy business. What is Saban so afraid of? Doesn’t he understand that people in the age of widespread internet are more informed than ever before. If the NYT doesn’t write about it, people will still find out about it. Case in point.

    What was the point of his “secret” BDS panel which leaked right away?
    It’s a joke!

    The entire affair just smells desperation. Also, hasn’t Goldberg been warning about “radically shifting” terms of debate for over five years now? Yet he has fought tooth and nail at every turn to prevent it. Even now, he’s smearing JVP. I remember when he used to laugh them off as a bunch of losers who couldn’t even all fit in a single minyan.

    Now he’s shitting his pants, sweating as his daughter relays one horror story after another of young Jews rejecting his racism.

    The times have changed.

  2. David Doppler
    David Doppler
    December 17, 2015, 4:42 pm

    Great, crucial reporting.

  3. oneangrycomic
    oneangrycomic
    December 18, 2015, 8:40 am

    I thought it was anti-Semitic to claim that exclusive colleges were 25% Jewish! lol… Since anti-ZioTerror organizations on these 25% Jewish campuses are growing, I guess that a lot of our younger Jews are self-loathing? Or maybe blind fanatical support of Apartheid Israel isn’t their cup of tea? Education often prevents hatred and ethnic cleansing from growing!

    BDS, JVP, SJP and other anti-Zionist organizations have the ZioThugs in a frenzied hysteria of fear – GOOD! Like cockroaches, they are holding their little meetings in the dark. Unfortunately for them, human rights/anti-ZioTerrorist organizations are shining a blinding light on their sinister, secret agenda! It’s very gratifying and entertaining to watch these Saban puppet cockroaches scurry for cover! With the help of young, educated Jews, the TRUTH will crush them!

  4. biggerjake
    biggerjake
    December 18, 2015, 12:25 pm

    Hillary’s support for Israel and non-support for BDS are the biggest disappointments for me in this years presidential race.

    “Hillary Clinton asserted —(Israel is our) closest ally in the fight against extremism.”

    What she should have said was that Israel is the United States closest ally in CREATING extremism…

  5. Boo
    Boo
    December 18, 2015, 12:35 pm

    They need to watch carefully how they tread, lest the proceedings of these dark meetings garner the name “Secret Protocols”.

  6. James Canning
    James Canning
    December 18, 2015, 1:36 pm

    To view Brookings Institution as “an arm of the Israel lobby” is entirely reasonable.

    • pabelmont
      pabelmont
      December 21, 2015, 11:41 am

      And, on that point in a manner of speaking, why say “behind closed doors at a leading liberal thinktank” instead of “behind closed doors at a Zionist-funded right-wing thinktank”?

      Or is it another PEP? (whatever “progressive” (or “liberal”) may, nowadays, be generally supposed to mean).

  7. a blah chick
    a blah chick
    December 18, 2015, 5:42 pm

    But remember this is the same BDS movement that is having NO effect on Israel. Think about a bunch of people with no wealth or power or influence have the enormously powerful influential Zionist lobby on the run.

    Keep doing what you’re doing folks, we’re having an impact.

  8. Steve Grover
    Steve Grover
    December 18, 2015, 9:56 pm

    Phil Sez:
    “That means no one was advocating for BDS.

    I wrote to Wittes, director of the Brookings Center for Middle East Policy, and to a Brookings spokesperson to ask who was on the panel and what its title was, and if any advocates for BDS were on the panel. Neither responded to my questions.”

    Exactly how it should be. BDS[..] are rightfully ignored.

  9. traintosiberia
    traintosiberia
    December 19, 2015, 4:38 pm

    Zionist would try to portray the campus activities as another expression of terrorism and hate speech . If they managed to drag the activist in courts and paint them in same brushes of is
    Islamophibia terrorism antisemitism, chances are that they would be able to destroy the careers of a lot of youth .
    This is the reason, a general atmosphere of tension and concerns about Muslim in the country is so desirable to Sheldon Haim Islamohobes gang .
    The rising tide of hatred,fear,and ignorance will keep these people’s nicley packaged profile on the friendly radar of American consciousness . War is the fuel that they know will keep the water flowing to support that tide . May be that’s why the advisors of Clinton,Rubio,and Cruz come from same chamber of horror

    https://theintercept.com/2015/12/18/beacon-global-strategies/

Leave a Reply