The big news is that when the Republican debate last night in Houston at last turned to foreign policy after 90 minutes, the top subject was Israel and for five or ten minutes, Israel was the word you heard repeated again and again on the stage. The good part is that we are at last getting a debate about U.S. foreign policy with Israel at the top of the list. The unfortunate part was that the candidates were trying to out-Israel one another, in particular Senators Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio; and Donald Trump was forced to vow over and over again that he is “totally pro-Israel” and “Nobody on this stage has done more for Israel than I have.”
Nonetheless, Trump also repeated his shocking declaration that he has to be neutral about the conflict because he has the ambition of negotiating a peace deal and:
It serves no purpose to say that you have a good guy and a bad guy. Now, I may not be successful in doing it, it’s probably the toughest negotiation anywhere in the world of any kind. OK, but it doesn’t help if I start saying– I’m very pro-Israel. Very. More than anybody on the stage. But it doesn’t do any good to start demeaning the neighbors because I would love to do something with regard to negotiating peace peace, finally for Israel, and for their neighbors… As a negotiator, I cannot do that as well if I’m taking big, big sides. With that being said, I am totally pro-Israel.
The idea that Trump would refuse to demean the Palestinians upset Marco Rubio.
“The position you’ve taken is an anti-Israel position.. Because you cannot be an honest broker in a dispute between two sides in which one of the sides is constantly acting in bad faith.”
He went on to repeat his talking points. The Palestinians have turned down one great offer after another. Palestinians teach their children at four to hate Jews. And the U.S. has to stand unapologetically with the only free-enterprise democracy in the Middle East.
Music to neoconservative donors’ ears. Bill Kristol, powerbroker:
Trump has made this race about who’s the alpha dog. Tonight it should be Rubio.
And this promotion of regime change by Kristol:
Trump: pro-Saddam and pro-Qaddafi. #MakingAmericaSuckUpToDictatorsAgain
That because Trump said it had been a terrible mistake to invade Iraq. He struck an anti-war and anti-regime change position on stage, citing Iraq and Libya. If Hillary Clinton is preparing for Trump, he is also preparing for her.
Trump’s comments are startling some observers. Former mediator Aaron David Miller:
Trump alone among his rivals is actually rational on the Israeli-Palestinian issue
Miller was responding to Shadi Hamid of Brookings:
Rubio and Cruz are so extreme on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, they made Trump look remarkably sensible.
And Michael Crowley at Politico observes today that Trump defies GOP litmus test on Israel.
Update. I forgot this part: Israel is like America’s child, Ben Carson said.
Ben Carson says Israel is America’s child. It’s true. Israel is largely the product of US-backed settler colonialism, racism and occupation.
— Ali Abunimah (@AliAbunimah) February 26, 2016
Thanks to James North.
It’s time to put Trump’s neutrality to the Democratic candidates and ask Hillary and, yes, even Bernie if they’re neutral on the Israeli/Palestinian issue.
This being said: I hate to envision Trump as a vehicle for peace with his ton of moral issues and really don’t see the honest broker in him.
His words: As a negotiator, I cannot do that as well if I’m taking big, big sides. With that being said, I am totally pro-Israel. Isn’t this an oxymoron? If he’s totally pro-Israel, totally, how is he not taking sides?
Rubio: It is not a real estate deal. The US cannot be an honest broker when dealing with terrorists.
Reality: It is in fact a territorial dispute, a kind of real estate deal, two peoples fighting over one piece of land. Israel uses settlements and elaborate foreign policy gyrations including the global war on terror aka the clash of civilization, and the biblical divine grant, and its modern IDF backed by the US, while the Palestinians use stones and scissors and knives. One side is winning. The other has been losing. For 68 years. Rubio is a pawn in Israel’s continuation of its strategy, a walking excuse for taking the rest of the land. Trump sees it clearly for what it is, wants to bring peace to both sides, and is suffering the slings and arrows of violating Zionist talking points.
This is in fact a crucial moment in the war of ideas in the US about how to deal with the Middle East: how best to settle a dispute over property. I think Trump has a better chance than anyone of making it happen, and he is likely to make liberal use of the international equivalent of eminent domain – taking from one side, and giving to the other – in order to achieve it. The Zionists know that it is game over for their decades-long strategy of taking it all, if it gets treated as a territorial dispute that can be resolved by compromise.
The “cannot-be-an-honest-broker” phrase is the key issue for American foreign policy in the Middle East. Netanyahu is leading the Zionist cause to this ultimate point, and demanding no compromise, no land for Palestine, no negotiation with them because of who they are, and attempting to cast all opposition as denial of Jews right to exist.
Now is the time for America to reject Rubio’s demand that we cannot be an honest broker. Trump can point out that it is Rubio who is indistinguishable from Hillary – both simply recite Israeli talking points. Rubio says he will be more in the face of the Palestinians, while Hillary will play the fake negotiations game for her entire term.
Only Trump has the cajones to say, in the heat of the debate in the run-up to Super Tuesday, that he sees it for what it is, and will do what he can to negotiate it. The Zionists and their fellow travelers are going all in this week. How will it play out on Tuesday?
I see the Drudge Report post-debate poll (right-wing biased) shows Trump the big winner. http://www.salon.com/2016/02/26/sorry_marco_the_drudge_report_stays_loyal_to_trump_the_donald_dominates_yet_another_post_debate_vote/
Does this not reflect the stupidity of the Israel Lobby’s choosing the Republican Party?
Vote Republican, get a Neocon. Vote Democrat get a Neocon. Neocon Kagan endorses Hillary Clinton https://consortiumnews.com/2016/02/25/neocon-kagan-endorses-hillary-clinton
Am I the only one who heard Rubio basically call all Palestinians terrorists and that Trump by being neutral was favoring terrorists?
I am surprised no one else has jumped on the followup statement about terrorists.