Trending Topics:

PEN director acknowledges ‘legitimate concerns’ about Israel sponsorship but won’t give back the money

on 5 Comments

Adalah-NY released the following statement about a meeting that several advocates held yesterday with PEN executive director Suzanne Nossel (a former State Department official who helped quash the Goldstone Report) over the organization’s acceptance of funds from the Israeli government acting as a “champion” of next week’s “World Voices” literary festival in New York, sponsorship that many leading writers have objected to.

A delegation from Adalah-NY, O/R Books and Verso Books held an impromptu meeting with PEN American Center Executive Director Suzanne Nossel on Tuesday regarding the call for PEN to reject Israeli government sponsorship of the World Voices Festival due to the Israeli government’s human rights abuses and suppression of Palestinians’ freedom of expression. The meeting took place in the PEN American Center office in Manhattan after the delegation delivered a letter signed by 12,500 people that called on PEN to reject Israeli government sponsorship for the annual festival, which begins April 25 in New York City. The letter was accompanied by statements from more than 20 literary figures explaining why they signed the letter to PEN.

Delegation from O/R Books, Verso Books and Adalah-NY at PENThough the delegation had not asked for an appointment in advance, Ms. Nossel agreed to meet. While waiting in the reception area, the delegation picked up hard copies of the program for the 2016 World Voices Festival that lists the Israeli Embassy among the “Champions” of the festival supporting writing and free expression.

Delegation from Adalah-NY, O/R books and Verso Books, at PEN yesterday

Delegation from Adalah-NY, O/R books and Verso Books, at PEN yesterday

Ms. Nossel told the visitors that she had read the statements by writers explaining why they believe PEN should reject Israeli government sponsorship. She said the letter and statements raised “legitimate concerns” and that the points were “not lost on her,” and she said there are diverse views on the issue. Ms. Nossel added that being responsive “may take time and space.” When John Oakes from O/R Books suggested that PEN supporters might fundraise to cover the costs of Israeli writers/participants so that PEN could return the money to the Israeli government, Ms. Nossel said PEN cannot consider returning the money, and asserted that there is a strong reaction against the word “boycott.” She did not elaborate on that point.

Allison Brown from Adalah-NY: The New York Campaign for the Boycott of Israel commented, “PEN’s public statements have been misrepresenting our letter, as well as the Palestinian cultural boycott call, as restricting the freedom of expression of Israeli writers. We explained again and in person that we are not calling for a boycott of individuals, but of the Israeli government and complicit institutions. We hope that PEN now has a more accurate understanding of the Palestinian boycott call and will not return again to that same argument.”

John Oakes of O/R Books said, “I’m of course disappointed in the response: it seems to me that if the funds were to be replaced, there’d be no harm to PEN, its audience or the participating authors. In fact, it would mark a wonderful coming-together of people united in asserting a commitment to civil liberties. The question here is really whether PEN will continue to allow its good name to be used as a cover by an aggressive regime that makes a practice of defying international law. It would be great if a public discussion on the cultural boycott of Israel were to take place in the coming weeks.”

Phan Nguyen of Verso Books explained that “PEN cannot claim freedom of expression as a defense, as it granted the Israeli government the status of ‘Champion’ strictly on the basis of financial support for the festival.”

Patrick Connors from Adalah-NY added, “Ms. Nossel acknowledged that we were right to press our case, and we will continue to do so in the hope that PEN will listen to these many members and writers, and will ultimately do the right thing and return the Israeli government funding.”

The letter to PEN has been signed by writer and activist Angela Davis, Pulitzer Prize–winners Junot Díaz, Richard Ford and Alice Walker, and National Book Award–winner Louise Erdrich. Writers who provided statements explaining their support for the letter to PEN include Eileen Myles, Fanny Howe, Geoff Dyer, Tom Sleigh, Randa Jarrar, Susan Abulhawa, Deborah Eisenberg, Laila Lalami, Russell Banks, and past PEN English Board President and Vice-President Gillian Slovo and Kamila Shamsie.

Participants cancelled a World Voices Festival event on The Language of War, saying they “stand in solidarity with this boycott call,” and five World Voices participants have withdrawn from the festival.

PEN American Center, the Festival organizer, is a US branch of the writers’ freedom of expression organization PEN International.In 2015, over 200 writers wrote to PEN American Center criticizing the organization’s decision to give a freedom of expression award to the magazine Charlie Hebdo due to its racist content. Controversy has also arisen in past years over Israeli government sponsorship of PEN’s World Voices Festival.

Mondoweiss Editors
About Mondoweiss Editors

Other posts by .

Posted In:

5 Responses

  1. Marnie
    April 20, 2016, 2:20 pm

    “She said the letter and statements raised “legitimate concerns” and that the points were “not lost on her,” and she said there are diverse views on the issue. Ms. Nossel added that being responsive “may take time and space.”

    More lip service from a zionist shill. I’m confused about “…..and space”. The final frontier? It’s going to take that f#@&*@g long?

  2. Keith
    April 20, 2016, 6:26 pm

    Curious that Mondoweiss would provide so little detail on this former Amnesty International USA Director who touted her Jewish values even as she supported the US in Afghanistan, the Gaza slaughter, and the Pussy Riot provocateurs. She is a member of the US elite birthright nomenklatura. Her position at both Amnesty and PEN indicates the extent to which many (most?) high profile NGOs are, in fact, closely linked to the US government and ruling elites. Yet another example of the massive influence of American Jewish Zionists within the corridors of power. I am providing a link to the Amnesty article on Mondoweiss.

    • annie
      April 20, 2016, 7:16 pm

      really? do you mean curious how mondoweiss would publish a press release instead of doing our own research and writing original coverage? or curious how anyone could forget a name like that from the 2012 article. when something is under the byline “mondoweiss editors” 99 chances out of 100 when MW publishes a press release someone sent in, it’s not altered, just a brief italiced forward. sorry if you find that inadequate.

  3. Nevada Ned
    Nevada Ned
    April 25, 2016, 1:14 am

    I’m not surprised by the actions of Suzanne Nossel. She’s a member of the military-intellectual complex, and is only unusual because she is female. She’s on the way to becoming another Samantha Powers.

    Back in 2013, peace activist John Walsh had an excellent article about Nossel and PEN.

    Click here for link to CounterPunch article by John Wash.

    • Keith
      April 25, 2016, 2:54 pm

      NEVADA NED- “Back in 2013, peace activist John Walsh had an excellent article about Nossel and PEN.”

      Most of these human rights NGOs have always been analogous to missionaries for capitalist imperialism, doing some good at the micro level while simultaneously supporting the framework of Western imperialism at the macro level. Lately, however, they have gotten worse. Perhaps at least somewhat inevitable with the increased concentration of wealth upward to those who fund and benefit from NGO policies and propaganda. Virtually all of the big human rights, environmental and feminist NGOs have been more or less co-opted. Your link is to a good article which also links to a book by John Peck called “Ideal Illusions: How the U.S. Government Co-opted Human Rights.” I ordered the book because the author wrote “Washington’s China,” an insightful analysis of US self-serving projections onto China’s actions. Others may consider doing likewise.

Leave a Reply