Trending Topics:

‘NY Times’ continues to whitewash Israel’s crimes on the Gaza border

Media Analysis
on 6 Comments

Larry Derfner, an American-turned-Israeli, is one of the most experienced and one of the best reporters in Israel. He has been following the terrible events inside the Gaza border, and his preliminary findings contradict the biased New York Times coverage.

The astonishing dishonesty in the Times continues in today’s paper. The headline is “Confrontations at Gaza Fence Leave 15 Dead.” The front-page article does immediately report that Israel killed 15 Palestinians, although it suspiciously waits until the 21st paragraph to add that another 1000 Palestinians were injured. But the Times insinuates right away that the Gazans are to blame for starting the violence: “. . . as some [Palestinians] began hurling stones and rolling burning tires at the fence, the Israelis responded with tear gas and gunfire.”

Larry Derfner is having none of this. He noted yesterday on his Facebook page that no Israeli soldiers stationed along the border with Gaza have been hurt at all:

I’ve checked Haaretz, Yediot Aharonot, Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, NY Times, Guardian and even Israel National News, and I saw no mention of any Israeli soldiers getting injured. Did I miss something? Were there any Israeli soldiers injured while they were killing at least 15 Palestinians and wounding over 1000 others in these ‘confrontations?’

In an email, Derfner, who has decades of experience reporting in Israel and has served in the Israeli military, added:

What the [Israeli Defense Force (IDF) ] was saying before Friday was that they would shoot at anybody who tried to break through the [Gaza border] fence or endangered the lives of soldiers. . .  So the 1000 or so Palestinians who got shot (about 750 of them by live fire) were all breaking through the fence? That doesn’t make sense — the fence would have come down, and it didn’t. So it seems the IDF fired at people who were using slingshots and Molotov cocktails and rolling tires that hit no one, and possibly at people who were simply moving ‘suspiciously’ toward the fence.

Contrast the Times’s bias with a more balanced report in the Washington Post, which stated simply and accurately: “More than 700 [Palestinian] people suffered gunshot wounds after Israeli sharpshooters deployed to the border opened fire with live ammunition.”

The Post also reported clearly that the “Israeli human rights group B’Tselem said Israel’s response to unarmed protesters was ‘illegal.’”

Meanwhile, the British Guardian actually reported from Gaza, quoting a Gazan ministry of health spokesperson: “Most of the dead [Gazans] were aged between 17 and 35 years old. The injuries were on the upper part of the body.”

[Larry Derfner’s compelling memoir of his evolution from liberal Zionist to a sharp critic of Israel, entitled No Country for Jewish Liberals, appeared last year.)

James North

James North is a Mondoweiss Editor-at-Large, and has reported from Africa, Latin America, and Asia for four decades. He lives in New York City.

Other posts by .

Posted In:

6 Responses

  1. John Douglas on March 31, 2018, 3:00 pm

    In a Times’ piece written by Isabel Kershner and Iyad Adabuheweila there is a photo of the Palestinian encampment that serves the massive protest. The caption under the photo,

    “Palestinians are protesting the more than a decade-long economic blockade of Gaza by Israel, and to demand a right of return for Palestinian refugees to the lands that became Israel 70 years ago.”

    Has anyone ever counted the thousands of distinct tactics of lying that the NY Times employs in reporting on Palestine/Israel?

  2. Edward Q on April 1, 2018, 10:57 am

    Maybe a complaint should be lodged with the NYT ombudsman.

  3. on April 1, 2018, 6:31 pm

    We all know the Times is a rag. Their coverage of the plight of the Palestinians is overwhelming biased in favour of Israel. I think it has to do with allowing mostly Zionist Jewish contributors to write/edit anything on Israel/Palestine.

    What is interesting is the coverage coming from the Post these days. I wonder if they are starting to believe there is a greater audience for balanced coverage rather parroting Israeli fed hasbara.

    Time will tell. But if one major publication takes the plunge i bet many will follow. It keeps Zionists up at night. They know it takes but one major influencer to go against them before the whole house of cards falls.

    • Jethro on April 2, 2018, 12:53 am

      ” I think it has to do with allowing mostly Zionist Jewish contributors to write/edit anything on Israel/Palestine.”

      Zionist, Jewish and Israeli, or married to an Israeli, with sons in the IDF (Isabel Kirshner and Ethan Bronner). Facts which are never disclosed in their reporting.

      It’s preposterous.

  4. genesto on April 2, 2018, 12:17 pm

    Hats off to the Washington Post! Now, let’s see if it can withstand the backlash, i.e. the withering attacks from the loyal Zionists sure to come, if they haven’t already.

    • MHughes976 on April 2, 2018, 4:42 pm

      The comments on the Washington Post (including one or two from me – I got 24 likes for one of them! ) are not completely unbalanced in favour of the Zionists. The road is doubtless very long but they will not conquer for ever and they know it.

Leave a Reply