Activism

UC protests test the limits of Zionist fiction

The aftermath of the violence at UCLA illustrates that we live in an upside-down world where we decry property damage on college campuses as we fund the genocide in Gaza, and where we advocate for free speech until it says “stop the genocide.”

On April 30, a mob of Zionist vigilantes descended onto UCLA’s Palestine Solidarity Encampment, besieging it and waging horrific violence against students for hours throughout the night. On May 1, UCLA called in the LAPD to clear the encampment by force, unleashing yet another brutal attack on students before the blood from the previous night had a chance to dry. On May 2, UCLA Chancellor Gene Block hosted a town hall for UCLA alumni during which he glossed over the horrific events that took place on campus under his watch.

During his webinar, to an audience of 1000 alums unable to comment, Chancellor Block described the violence of the first night as a scuffle with some “pushing and shoving.” When asked about clearing the encampment the following night, he went so far as to praise police conduct as “patient” and “professional.” He claimed that police did not cause any “serious injuries” and that they had used techniques to “minimize harm.” He told these lies with a straight face as if his audience did not have access to the internet — as if we haven’t seen countless videos of rabid agitators beating students with metal rods and planks of wood, spraying students in the face with bear mace and launching explosives and other projectiles into the encampment. As if we haven’t seen the images of students bleeding profusely after being shot in the head with rubber bullets by brutal police forces. As if we haven’t heard the screams of terror as students fought for their lives on their own campus.

These outright lies from the Chancellor would have come as more of a shock if they did not perfectly align with the reality that we have all become accustomed to over the last six months: Zionism relies entirely on fiction, and its defenders will lie blatantly and shamelessly to uphold it, even in the face of irrefutable evidence. Without any substantive basis for the position, the best defense of Zionism has always been censorship and intimidation. Zionists are aware that even the tiniest opening for a legitimate conversation on the topic would send their entire argument crashing down.

A recent example of this phenomenon played out when Dean Erwin Chemerinsky of Berkeley Law, one of the most lauded legal minds of our time, was too afraid to let a student speak about Palestine during a school event held at his home. A vocal and staunch champion of free speech, Chemerinksy chose to shout over the speaker and silence her to avoid being confronted with her words — words he would not be able to refute. It is telling that Chemerinsky is able to argue persuasively and confidently before the Supreme Court, but cannot defend his position on Palestine before one of his students. 

The use of censorship and repression to uphold Zionism is not exclusive to university contexts; the incidents at UCLA and UC Berkeley are just two examples of a widespread phenomenon. Here are a few more examples: Israeli leadership continues to argue that civilians killed in Gaza are unfortunate collateral damage, even after it has come to light that the IOF uses AI to target men in their homes when they are with their wives and children. Western leaders proclaim that Israel has the right to use force in “self-defense,” while in reality, Palestinians are the ones who are afforded that right under international law as people living under a belligerent and illegal military occupation. The New York Times — America’s paper of record — peddled an October 7 rape hoax that has been thoroughly discredited by multiple sources, and the paper has failed to pull the story from its site. In fact, the only effort NYT has made to correct the record for their journalistic malpractice has been launching an internal investigation to identify the source of the “leak” revealing the paper’s shoddy investigation. Every Biden administration spokesperson gets up on a podium and proclaims that Israel is working tirelessly to minimize civilian casualties, even as this administration bypasses Congress to send 2000-pound bunker bombs to drop on refugee camps. All these lies are told to manufacture consent for a genocide that killed more children in its first four months than were killed in all other conflicts globally in the last four years.

We live in an upside-down world where facts mean nothing and fantasy dominates. Where we rant and rave about property damage on college campuses as we fund the destruction and decimation of every home, hospital, and school in Gaza. Where university presidents resign for failing to protect students from protest slogans while Chancellor Block allows his students to be beaten to a pulp two nights in a row. Where we advocate for free speech until that speech says, “stop the genocide.” 

This perpetual manipulation and dishonesty is a sign of desperation — a last-ditch effort to salvage an indefensible ideology used to justify ethno-supremacy and apartheid. As these lies grow even more grotesquely convoluted, they accelerate the demise of the system they seek to defend. 

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“These administrators demand, like all who manage corporate systems of power, total obedience. Dissent. Freedom of expression. Critical thought. Moral outrage. These have no place in our corporate-indentured universities.” Chris Hedges

Emory Inc. President Gregory Fenves crashed head-on into student moral outrage and he still denies calling the cops on his own staff and students. @- Emory Inc. protest coverage on Atlanta News First: over 204k views, 5379 comments :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5t5ldOXvwQ

The majority of the 5380 comments SUPPORT beating-up students and professors! The pro-israel hate generated in the local community around Emory University is stunning.
The majority of the comments slammed the professors and students violently beat down and arrested. Emory refuses to drop the charges against its own professors and students. Both Faculty and Students have voted ‘no confidence’ on Pres.Gregory Fenves. Emory has cowardly moved their graduation ceremony to GasSouth Arena, a parking-lot nightmare generic corporate ‘safe place’ in Duluth, GA. Many professors agree that Emory needs a new president with a humanities background; Pres. Fenves and several past presidents were engineer majors.
Atlanta is buried in zionism and jewish supremacy. Emory has $11 billion endowment and is Atlanta’s largest employer with over 35,000+ employees.

No room for legitimate conversation @- Emory Inc.

.”This perpetual manipulation and dishonesty is a sign of desperation — a last-ditch effort to salvage an indefensible ideology used to justify ethno-supremacy and apartheid. As these lies grow even more grotesquely convoluted, they accelerate the demise of the system they seek to defend.”

Although the manipulation and dishonesty have always been part of Israel’s MO. Sustain the myths Same for the U.S although U.S. basically forced to give up their apartheid system during civil war to some degree. Then the systemic racism embedded in the system took hold. Although has and is being broken down via awareness and legislation passed.

The myths created and sold by Israel, the I lobby and a complicit media about what Israel is and once wanted to stand for are crumbling and the walls of silence that protected or fueled those myths are being called out on the carpet. Israeli leaders have a massive choice to make.

Nathan Thrall describes Israel’s choices best.
:
https://www.democracynow.org/2024/5/9/nathan_thrall_west_bank_violence

NATHAN THRALL: You know, these conversations are premised on the notion that Israel eventually has to choose: It has to either give the millions of Palestinians living under its control without basic civil rights — it has to give them either citizenship, with equality, or statehood. And so many people in the diplomatic community would like to have, as they have been having for decades, debates about what a two-state outcome should look like, whether there should be two states or one state or confederation or what have you.

And all of that is an enormous distraction from the reality on the ground, because the fact of the matter is, Israel does not have to choose between two states and one state. It doesn’t have to choose between giving Palestinians sovereignty or citizenship. It has a third option, which is to continue on the path that it’s going down. The path that it’s going down is slow, de facto annexation of the West Bank, an absorption of the West Bank settlements in Area C, a takeover of Palestinian land, and a constriction of Palestinians into small walled-off or fenced-off communities, like the town of Anata, where my book takes place, or like Gaza.

And so, rather than focusing on the reality, which is a movement in the opposite direction of either two states or equality in one state, but rather a deepening of this system of control that leading human rights organizations, like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch and the U.N. Human Rights Council and Al-Haq and B’Tselem, have all described as a system of apartheid — rather than addressing that system, Israel would very much like for everybody to debate what would be the ideal outcome, what is the future utopia that we would all like, and let’s only address this structural inequality, this systematic domination,

Zionist fiction may have limits, but limits are not much on display today in the USA. I ought to know better, but I continue to be surprised by the power of Zionist fiction. I can’t speak for Palestinians, but it seems clear that they want, need, and deserve to live a life of dignity and freedom and citizenship in a state that gives them equal rights. To me, that is what is conveyed by the phrase “from the river to the sea, Palestine must be free.” It does not say, “from the river to the sea, Jews must be killed.” Israel has denied Palestinians property, rights, freedom, even–in many cases–life itself. Some Palestinians have tried to resist, but resistance has been futile. Israelis project their motives and actions on Palestinians (as Tom Friedman explains in From Beirut to Jerusalem.)

Per the LA Times:

Burning Man, home of ‘radical self-expression,’ removes pro-Palestinian sculpture from its website

. . . at the heart of the controversy was the phrase “From the River to the Sea,” according to the petition.

It argues that the phrase “has been condemned as antisemitic and recognized as a call for the destruction of Israel,’’ and that the slogan “perpetuates the falsehood that Jews have no historical connection to the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. However, historical records demonstrate that Jewish civilization has been present in the region for over 3,000 years.”

The petition itself begins:

We, the undersigned, urgently call for the removal of the “From the River to the Sea” art installation at the Burning Man event. This installation features a phrase that has been condemned as antisemitic and recognized as a call for the destruction of Israel. 

As someone who has personally experienced the profound pain caused by antisemitic rhetoric, it is disheartening to see this installation using language that advocates for the annihilation of Israel. The phrase “From the River to the Sea” is more than just words; it is a battle cry that legitimizes violence against Jewish people and promotes a vision that denies the Jewish state’s right to exist. This slogan has haunted our community for generations, reviving memories of persecution and oppression.

Condemnation of the Slogan: The U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a bipartisan resolution condemning the phrase “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” as “outrightly antisemitic.” This resolution recognizes that the slogan denies the right to self-determination and calls for the eradication of Israel​.

It would be nice if our leaders asked, what do Palestinians actually want? What do they deserve?

https://www.juancole.com/2024/05/israel-destroy-palestinians.html

Zionists are aware that even the tiniest opening for a legitimate conversation on the topic would send their entire argument crashing down.
__________________________________________________________

Challenging with words and ideas would be a form of resistance that would be effective and would garner support and respect throughout the West.