Media Analysis

The thrilling Naftali Bennett

Liberal Zionists are secretly exultant over Naftali Bennett unseating Benjamin Netanyahu, hoping it will end the politicization of Israel in U.S. politics. But Apartheid is a hard sell and Bennett will quickly be on a collision course with a lot of people in the United States who think Palestinians should have rights.

The news from Israel is that on Sunday Naftali Bennett, the rightwing former tech entrepreneur, is likely to ring out the Benjamin Netanyahu era by becoming prime minister with a very diverse “change” coalition of 61 seats in the parliament, including a rightwing Palestinian party, Ra’am.

Israel lobby groups such as AIPAC, Israel Policy Forum and Democratic Majority for Israel love the new government because it will be easier to sell Bennett to Democrats than Netanyahu, a despised figure.

Liberal Zionists are secretly exultant over the change for the same reason, they hope it will end the open politicization of Israel among Democrats. “For all those who care about Israeli democracy and still believe that a better future is possible, Netanyahu’s fall from power is a cause for great relief — even as we recognize that the political defeat of one dangerous man will not magically bring about all the change we still yearn for,” J Street declared.

Already you can feel that Bennett is being sanitized for an American audience. A political aide/Israel lobbyist on MSNBC says that Bennett has “evolved” since the days that he taunted a Palestinian politician, “when you were still swinging from trees, we had a Jewish state here.” And when he said, “I’ve killed lots of Arabs in my life and there’s no problem with that.”

On NPR today, the host left out both those quotes when she referred to Bennett as a “gentleman.”

Can you imagine Dwight Eisenhower or Jimmy Carter bragging about all the people they’d killed in the military in order to ascend to the White House? Rashid Khalidi asked last night on an Arab American Institute appearance. Oh, but this is Israel, which excels at delivering racist violence. Another member of the Change coalition is Benny Gantz, a centrist who ran a campaign ad saying he’d bombed Gaza “back to the stone age.” And Bennett himself said three years ago that Israeli troops should have a “shoot to kill” policy for Gaza protesters, including minors.

But let’s look at the main ray of hope that a Bennett government represents for liberal Zionists. Bennett will help restore bipartisan political support for Israel in the U.S., including from Democrats, because: he will lower tensions between Jews and Palestinians, won’t shove settlements/Jerusalem on to Biden’s plate, and because he has made that historic partnership with a Palestinian party.

Certainly Bennett’s deal with Ra’am is historic. Israeli governments have always excluded Palestinians. This one will have some conservative Palestinian membership.

No doubt Mansour Abbas, Bennett’s Palestinian coalition partner, has thrown his political weight around in a jawdropping manner. Under the deal Ra’am cut, Bennett will legalize some Bedouin villages and develop Palestinians areas. “They are talking about a new Arab city. Israel never had a new Arab city built in its history!” Tal Schneider said, gushing over Abbas’s media savvy on an Israel Policy Forum briefing.

But Ra’am’s participation is not redemptive. Israel is now officially an “apartheid” state, according to a long list of experts. Ra’am’s token inclusion really only highlights the degree of Palestinian exclusion in the Jewish state. “This is a democracy?” Rashid Khalidi exclaimed during his discussion with James Zogby last night. Five million Palestinians are “under Israel’s boot for 50 years”– and every important decision regarding their lives is made by a parliament they can’t vote for.

Consider the famous photo of Abbas and Yair Lapid and Naftali Bennett signing the coalition agreement last week. Two of these men will be alternating prime ministers in the new government: Lapid won 17 seats and will become P.M. in two years, after Bennett, whose Yamina (rightward) party won only 7 seats.

Abbas, with 4 seats, was the last guy to sign on, which ought to give him the strongest bargaining position. But of course he isn’t considered as prime minister material.

Let alone Ayman Odeh, the leader of the other three Palestinian parties, which won 6 seats. Odeh is the most appealing/inspiring/leftleaning “change” politician in the country; but his party didn’t sign on to this government.

A handout picture provided by the United Arab List Raam on June 2, 2021, shows head of the Arab Israeli Islamic conservative party Raam Mansour Abbas (R) signing a coalition agreement with Israel's opposition leader Yair Lapid (L) and right-wing nationalist tech millionaire Naftali Bennett in Ramat Gan near the coastal city of Tel Aviv. - Israel's opposition leader Yair Lapid said he had succeeded in forming a coalition to end the rule of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the country's longest serving leader. (Photo: United Arab List Raam/AFP via Getty Images)
A handout picture provided by the United Arab List Raam on June 2, 2021, shows head of the Arab Israeli Islamic conservative party Raam Mansour Abbas (R) signing a coalition agreement with Israel’s opposition leader Yair Lapid (L) and right-wing nationalist tech millionaire Naftali Bennett in Ramat Gan near the coastal city of Tel Aviv. (Photo: United Arab List Raam/AFP via Getty Images)

Of course, it’s a good thing that Abbas is getting some small victories for Palestinians. But the presence of one conservative Palestinians serves to highlight the persecution and nonrepresentation of millions of Palestinians to Abbas’s left.

“This is not about names but policies,” Sami Abou Shehadeh of the Joint List writes. “No matter how the new Israeli government looks like, we’ll continue demanding the same: Equality, respect for Int. Law, ending the occupation. … You cannot continue ignoring us.”

So back to the question. Will Bennett make life easier for Joe Biden inside the Democratic Party, by removing the dead weight of Netanyahu? Will he slow down the delegitimization of Israel around the world and in the United States, where polls show a large chunk of the Democratic Party has more sympathy for Palestinians than Israelis and cares about human rights?

Liberal Zionists are clearly chuffed about this possibility. “[F]or the first time in many years — Israeli leaders and society could have an opportunity to change course,” J Street says. While Gabi Mitchell gave a J Street talk saying it’s time for U.S. and Israeli leaders to have a serious dialogue and agree, “We are in this together,” albeit with different interests.

Let’s acknowledge that a Bennett government will be a signal improvement in one respect: it won’t actively try to stop Biden from reentering the Iran deal.

But when it comes to the core issue here, Israel’s treatment of Palestinians, Bennett is to Netanyahu’s right on issues like annexing portions of the West Bank and will in the end hasten American alienation.

“I think Bennett et al will make the problem worse for Israel here in the US, because its behavior won’t improve even after Netanyahu is gone and it might get worse,” writes a foreign policy friend. “Instead of blaming it all on one obnoxious guy who overstayed his welcome, people will begin to realize the problem is intrinsic to the system as a whole.” 

For instance, the West Bank– which Bennett, a religious Jew, invariably calls “Judea and Samaria.” Biden and Bennett will try to reach an understanding to make the issue go away, Barak Ravid said on an Israel Policy Forum call.

I don’t think anyone with a clear mind thinks there’s any point in relaunching peace talks…. [So] how do we put the two state solution in a box, so we freeze the situation, we don’t take it forward, but we don’t make things worse? I think some deal will have to be worked out about that.

Good luck. Biden and Bennett are just two actors. The global outrage over the evictions in Sheikh Jarrah and the courage/celebrity of Mohammed and Muna El-Kurd shows that Palestinian solidarity is growing rapidly and that movement is demanding actual human rights for Palestinians rather than persecution. Last night Khalidi hailed unprecedented demonstrations in Germany and Lebanon. The recent explosion of the Sheikh Jarrah evictions into an Israeli invasion of the Noble Sanctuary in occupied Jerusalem and a shooting war with Gaza shows how inevitably discriminatory are the policies of the “Nation State of the Jewish people.”

Yair Lapid is a liberal Zionist’s dream. He is a former TV host and is to be Foreign Minister. The government will also have a Palestinian face in Issawi Frej of the left Zionist party Meretz, due to be minister of regional cooperation (Ravid says).

But if these politicians seem enlightened, they are outweighed by rightwing forces. Israeli politics remains overwhelmingly rightwing– about 80 of the 120-member Knesset are far-right to center-right. Gideon Sa’ar and Avigdor Lieberman are settler advocates in the new government, and Naftali Bennett is an ardent advocate of the exclusive right of Jewish self-determination in the land.

Just look at Bennett’s hateful video from 9 years ago that advocates as a solution to the Palestinian issue the annexation of Area C in the West Bank and granting of limited rights to Palestinians in the remaining land. Bennett puts forward a variety of unconscionable goals that I’ve snipped out with the images below: so that Israel can continue to steal half its drinking water from the West Bank, so that it can maintain a Jewish majority in its land and staunch the “demographic” pressures of too many Palestinians, so that it can crush the right of return of Palestinian refugees even to the West Bank, and so that it can mute “apartheid” accusations.

Notice Bennett’s use of blue paperclips for Jews and brown and black and ones for Palestinians. Classy. This is what Bennett’s friend Mark Mellman of the Democratic Majority for Israel will be selling to Democrats!

Screenshot from Bennett video on how to resolve the Palestinian issue in “Judea and Samaria,” the West Bank. 2012.
Screenshot from Bennett video on how to resolve the Palestinian issue in “Judea and Samaria,” the West Bank. 2012.
Screenshot from Bennett video on how to resolve the Palestinian issue in “Judea and Samaria,” the West Bank. 2012.
Screenshot from Bennett video on how to resolve the Palestinian issue in “Judea and Samaria,” the West Bank. 2012.

Bennett’s rhetoric may have evolved but his bottom line remains: “The establishment of a Palestinian state based on the ’67 borders is impossible… because it puts Israel in danger.” As he told the Guardian in 2017, there will never be a Palestinian state on his watch. “It’s just not going to happen. A Palestinian state would be a disaster for the next 200 years.” Or as Sami Abou Shehadeh tells the Guardian, A Bennett administration is “light years away from democratic change” and “supports the settlements and the continuation of the siege on Gaza, and sanctifies the institutionalised mechanisms that perpetuate Jewish superiority and the marginalisation of the Palestinian citizens.”

Apartheid is a hard sell, and Americans are beginning to grasp the reality. Today even the Brookings Institution is questioning how a country can be Jewish and democratic.

And that puts the thrilling Naftali Bennett on a collision course with a lot of people in the United States.

8 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“Bennett puts forward a variety of unconscionable goals that I’ve snipped out with the images below: so that Israel can continue to steal half its drinking water from the West Bank…” Amnesty International has a paper from 2017, “The Occupation of Water”:

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2017/11/the-occupation-of-water/

The legacy of Israel’s 50-year occupation of the Palestinian territories has been systematic human rights violations on a mass scale. One of its most devastating consequences is the impact of Israel’s discriminatory policies on Palestinians’ access to adequate supplies of clean and safe water.

1 of 2
https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-bennett-s-religious-zionist-regime-is-coming-1.9890211
“Bennett’s Religious Zionist Regime Is Coming”
Gideon Levy. Haaretz. June 10, 2021 12:09 AM
“The anticipated investiture of Israel’s first religious-Zionist prime minister could also usher in a new type of national conversation, one of condescending, religious-patriotic schmaltz, saccharine and pathetic. It is not exactly new: This brand of discourse has starred on the hills of the West Bank for half a century, with all the sanctimonious gazing heavenward. From there it spread to the army and the media and all the other junctions of power that the religious Zionists have conquered over the past several years. From now on, it will play a much more central role.
“The Jewish state will become the Yiddishkeit state. In the role of the harbinger is MK Nir Orbach of Yamina. The post he wrote explaining his decision to support Naftali Bennett’s government is an instructive document: a thousand sublime words about nothing. A personal political decision presented as if it had world-shaking importance. A political deal by someone who has switched parties a few times, packaged as a shift in the order of creation.
“Choosing one of two possible right-wing governments, as if it were a matter of ‘principle.’ When Moses came down from Mount Sinai, he sounded less pompous. From now on, any amendment to the laws governing parking will be presented as if it was a divine order. We may as well start getting used to it.
“Good old Hapoel Hamizrachi, whose leaders objected to launching the Six-Day War, was long since replaced by messiahs on their own behalf. Orbach best exemplifies the change: In his own eyes, he is the Messiah’s deputy. What didn’t he throw into the flowery explanation of his decision; they, by the way, are always the only ones who have misgivings. They have exclusivity over values and principles, too.
“Key terms in his post are as follows: eternal values and the eternal people (which is not afraid); theAmoraim and the Tannaim; the Zionist vision and the musician Aviv Geffen; the popular Haredi musician Avraham Fried and 2,000 years of exile; not willingly (with them, nothing is done willingly).
(cont’d)

2 of 2
“The style is the man himself, and that’s fine, but pay attention to the content: the return of the repellent, arrogant, ultranationalist talk of ‘a model society’ & ‘a light unto the nations.’ At a time when Israel has long since stopped being a beacon, a pocket flashlight or even a match of morality to the world, but is rather something of a pariah state – for many good reasons, people in the religious right continue to deceive with their talk of an exemplary society. Even Orbach thinks we no longer are, if only for the past two years & only because we don’t have a stable government. Up until then, & we’ll soon be again – a light unto the nations, thanks to his decision to support Bennett.
“This mindset must be taken seriously. It has seeped deep into Israeli society, far beyond Bennett’s base. Many Israelis, too many, still believe in the preposterous story about the chosen people & our divine right to this land. Seemingly, there’s nothing wrong with it; what’s so bad about a people that is self-satisfied to the point of intoxication? But as in every loss of contact with reality, here too there is a suicidal syndrome that is dangerous to believers & their surroundings.
“What kind of model society is Orbach talking about? The one that deports asylum seekers? That throws people out of their homes because of their national affiliation? The one that imprisons hundreds of people without a trial? That shoots demonstrators? Light unto the nations, seriously? It would be enough for Israel to be like all other nations. In terms of morality, it is inferior to the most mediocre of them. And of which eternal values of religious Zionism does he speak, as a representative of a movement that worships mass dispossession, that believes in the supremacy of one nation over another in this land, that believes that a divine promise equals property registration, that is sure there is no one else besides it & that translates its condescending beliefs into political doctrine?
“They condescend to the non-Jews & to secular Jews. They are principled, with full wagons ranged against all the empty wagons. They are more pioneering & more Zionist than everyone else. They do not deal with trifles, but rather only with the fate of the Jewish people. Orbach is not important, his thought & his style will from now on be more important…

Regarding the primary issue in my eyes facing Israel: the Palestinians, specifically the West Bank, any optimism regarding the future lacks any basis in reality regarding how Bennett perceives the issue. One can only hope that in direct talks as prime minister with people like Blinken, Biden, Pelosi and Schumer that Mister Bennett will get an education and imbibe a dose of realism regarding the long range vicissitudes of the right wing position regarding the West Bank. I think the unstuck nature of ending a Netanyahu prime ministership of over 12 years in its current term (plus 3 other years in his term from 96 to 99) will allow possible innovation and a breath of fresh air, if the Palestinian issue can be ignored at the same time. ( a big and morally evasive “if”). Olmert was an accidental prime minister, Israel has had a few of those, and bennett is an accidental prime minister too, but he’s a young man and there’s no predicting the longevity of his career two days before it is to begin. When Bibi came in in 2009, Olmert’s offers to Abbas were still lingering in the air and were heartily rejected by the Israeli voters. The types of offers he made (and I IMHO do not blame Abbas for rejecting the offers of a man halfway out the door) indeed will not be repeated soon without some radical change right now not visible on the horizon and it is Netanyahu who gets the credit/blame for moving the Israeli discussion away from Olmert and his reasonable offers to Bibi’s public posture of no state no way no how, which is now the position of the vast majority of Jewish Israelis. 12 years of Netanyahu accomplished that. His ego has dominated Israeli politics for such a long stretch it will be interesting to see the post bibi era begin. (By the way, Gaza did not kick bibi out. 4 inconclusive elections and fatigue knocked bibi out. Gaza is something that is deeply troubling but seemingly solvable because of the removal of the settlements. Obviously separating Gaza from the West Bank is seen as a nefarious project by peaceniks and progressives, but just in terms of mechanics, there is no reason that Hamas cannot be disarmed and Gaza can be turned into a functioning economic unit. If there would be a will there could be a way. But the will is certainly lacking on both the part of Israel’s right wing and the Palestinian resistance movement. But the mechanics are much easier than regarding the West Bank.)

 Under the deal Ra’am cut, Bennett will legalize some Bedouin villages and develop Palestinians areas.”
And when Bennett and Lapid don’t keep these promises, what will Mansour Abbas do? Will he bring down the government? Will he even threaten to do it?